Literature DB >> 26261722

Imaging preoperatively for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Jason Alan Pietryga1, Desiree E Morgan1.   

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer is a highly lethal malignancy which is increasing in incidence and mortality. The fourth leading cause of cancer death in the U.S., pancreatic cancer is projected to become the second leading cause of cancer death by 2020. Patients with pancreatic cancer have an abysmal 5-year survival of 6%, and 90% of these patients eventually die from the disease. This is in large part due to the commonly advanced stage of disease at the time of diagnosis. Currently, the only potentially curative therapy for pancreatic carcinoma is complete surgical resection. Patients who undergo incomplete resection with residual disease have similar survival rates to those patients with metastatic disease and should be spared this relatively morbid surgery. Thus, the key to impacting prognosis is the detection of smaller and earlier stage lesions, and the key to optimal management is accurately determining which patients have potentially resectable surgery and which patients would not benefit from surgery. Cross-sectional imaging plays an essential role in both the diagnosis and appropriate staging of pancreatic carcinoma. The diagnosis and staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma is performed with cross-sectional imaging. Multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) is the most commonly used, best-validated imaging modality for the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer. Modern contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been demonstrated to be equivalent to MDCT in detection and staging of pancreatic cancer. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is very sensitive for detecting pancreatic masses; however, due to limitations in adequate overall abdominal staging, it is generally used in addition to or after MDCT. Transabdominal ultrasound and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) have limited roles in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer. Preoperative imaging is used to characterize patients as having resectable disease, borderline resectable disease, locally advanced disease (unresectable) and metastatic disease (unresectable). As the definitions of borderline resectable and unresectable may vary from institution to institution and within institutions, it is essential to accurately assess and describe the factors relevant to staging including: local extent of tumor, vascular involvement, lymph node involvement and distant metastatic disease. To facilitate this, standardized reporting templates for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma have been created and published. Structured reporting for pancreatic cancer has been reported to provide superior evaluation of pancreatic cancer, facilitate surgical planning, and increase surgeons' confidence about tumor resectability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pancreatic cancer; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT); staging

Year:  2015        PMID: 26261722      PMCID: PMC4502157          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2015.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol        ISSN: 2078-6891


  78 in total

1.  Improving communication of diagnostic radiology findings through structured reporting.

Authors:  Lawrence H Schwartz; David M Panicek; Alexandra R Berk; Yuelin Li; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Diagnostic evaluation of solid pancreatic masses.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Tokar; Rohit Walia
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2013-10

3.  Pathways of extrapancreatic perineural invasion by pancreatic adenocarcinoma: evaluation with 3D volume-rendered MDCT imaging.

Authors:  Swati D Deshmukh; Jürgen K Willmann; R Brooke Jeffrey
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Teardrop superior mesenteric vein: CT sign for unresectable carcinoma of the pancreas.

Authors:  T J Hough; V Raptopoulos; B Siewert; J B Matthews
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 5.  Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound and computed tomography for the preoperative evaluation of pancreatic cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  John Dewitt; Benedict M Devereaux; Glen A Lehman; Stuart Sherman; Thomas F Imperiale
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 11.382

6.  Pancreatic malignancy: value of arterial, pancreatic, and hepatic phase imaging with multi-detector row CT.

Authors:  Joel G Fletcher; Maurits J Wiersema; Michael A Farrell; Jeff L Fidler; Lawrence J Burgart; Takashi Koyama; C Daniel Johnson; David H Stephens; Ellen M Ward; W Scott Harmsen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Lower frequency of peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients with pancreatic cancer diagnosed by EUS-guided FNA vs. percutaneous FNA.

Authors:  Carlos Micames; Paul S Jowell; Rebekah White; Erik Paulson; Rendon Nelson; Michael Morse; Herbert Hurwitz; Theodore Pappas; Douglas Tyler; Kevin McGrath
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Single-source dual-energy spectral multidetector CT of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: optimization of energy level viewing significantly increases lesion contrast.

Authors:  B N Patel; J V Thomas; M E Lockhart; L L Berland; D E Morgan
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 2.350

9.  A prospective diagnostic accuracy study of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography, multidetector row computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in primary diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Saila P Kauhanen; Gaber Komar; Marko P Seppänen; Kirsti I Dean; Heikki R Minn; Sami A Kajander; Irina Rinta-Kiikka; Kalle Alanen; Ronald J Borra; Pauli A Puolakkainen; Pirjo Nuutila; Jari T Ovaska
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  Imaging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: update on staging/resectability.

Authors:  Eric P Tamm; Aparna Balachandran; Priya R Bhosale; Matthew H Katz; Jason B Fleming; Jeffrey H Lee; Gauri R Varadhachary
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 2.303

View more
  34 in total

Review 1.  Adjuvant treatment for pancreatic ductal carcinoma.

Authors:  T Macarulla; T Fernández; M E Gallardo; O Hernando; A M López; M Hidalgo
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 2.  Imaging in pancreatic disease.

Authors:  Julien Dimastromatteo; Teresa Brentnall; Kimberly A Kelly
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 46.802

3.  CT in the prediction of margin-negative resection in pancreatic cancer following neoadjuvant treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sohee Park; Jong Keon Jang; Jae Ho Byun; Jin Hee Kim; Seung Soo Lee; Hyoung Jung Kim; Seung Baek Hong; Seong Ho Park
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Absence of a Periampullary Mass on Cross-sectional Imaging Delays Diagnosis and Time to Pancreatoduodenectomy But Does Not Impair Outcome.

Authors:  Hideo Takahashi; Maitham A Moslim; Naftali Presser; Colin O'Rourke; Jane Wey; Sricharan Chalikonda; Matthew R Walsh; Gareth Morris-Stiff
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Comparison of DWIBS/T2 image fusion and PET/CT for the diagnosis of cancer in the abdominal cavity.

Authors:  Minoru Tomizawa; Fuminobu Shinozaki; Yoshitaka Uchida; Katsuhiro Uchiyama; Satomi Tanaka; Takafumi Sunaoshi; Daisuke Kano; Eriko Sugiyama; Misaki Shite; Ryouta Haga; Yoshiya Fukamizu; Toshiyuki Fujita; Satoshi Kagayama; Rumiko Hasegawa; Yoshinori Shirai; Yasufumi Motoyoshi; Takao Sugiyama; Shigenori Yamamoto; Naoki Ishige
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 6.  Hereditary and Sporadic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Current Update on Genetics and Imaging.

Authors:  Ajaykumar C Morani; Abdelrahman K Hanafy; Nisha S Ramani; Venkata S Katabathina; Sireesha Yedururi; Anil K Dasyam; Srinivasa R Prasad
Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer       Date:  2020-03-13

Review 7.  Opportunities for new CT contrast agents to maximize the diagnostic potential of emerging spectral CT technologies.

Authors:  Benjamin M Yeh; Paul F FitzGerald; Peter M Edic; Jack W Lambert; Robert E Colborn; Michael E Marino; Paul M Evans; Jeannette C Roberts; Zhen J Wang; Margaret J Wong; Peter J Bonitatibus
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 8.  Current and Emerging Clinical Applications of Multispectral Optoacoustic Tomography (MSOT) in Oncology.

Authors:  Lacey R McNally; Megan Mezera; Desiree E Morgan; Peter J Frederick; Eddy S Yang; Isam-Eldin Eltoum; William E Grizzle
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 9.  [Ductal adenocarcinoma and unusual differential diagnosis].

Authors:  P Haage; C A Schwartz; C Scharwächter
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 10.  Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: conceptual evolution and current approach to image-based classification.

Authors:  J W Gilbert; B Wolpin; T Clancy; J Wang; H Mamon; A B Shinagare; J Jagannathan; M Rosenthal
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 32.976

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.