Giovanni Marchegiani1, Valentina Todaro1, Enrico Boninsegna2, Riccardo Negrelli2, Binit Sureka3, Debora Bonamini1, Roberto Salvia1, Riccardo Manfredi4, Roberto Pozzi Mucelli2, Claudio Bassi5. 1. Department of General Surgery, Verona University Hospital, Policlinico G. B. Rossi, P.le Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy. 2. Department of Radiology, Verona University Hospital, Policlinico G. B. Rossi, P.le Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy. 3. Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences of New Delhi, New Delhi, India. 4. Department of Radiology of the Policlinico Gemelli, Catholic University of Rome, Rome, Italy. 5. Department of General Surgery, Verona University Hospital, Policlinico G. B. Rossi, P.le Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy. claudio.bassi@univr.it.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess factors associated with radical resection (R0) of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) after induction treatment with FOLFIRINOX. METHODS: Patients with either locally advanced (LA) and borderline resectable (BR) PDAC undergoing surgical exploration after FOLFIRINOX were retrospectively enrolled. Two pancreatic radiologists reviewed the CT blinded to the final outcome and assessed chemotherapy response and resectability. Patients were then divided into R0 resected (group A) and not resected/R1 resected (group B), which were compared. RESULTS: Of 59 patients included, 19 were defined as unresectable (32%), 33 borderline resectable (56%) and 7 resectable (12%) during the blind radiological evaluation after FOLFIRINOX. Once in a surgical setting, 27% were non-resectable, whereas 73% received surgical resection with a 70% R0 rate. Consequent sensitivity and specificity were 86% and 29%. At imaging review, significant decreases in longest tumour dimension were observed in both groups: from 32 mm (95% CI 15-55) to 21 (10-44) in group A and from 34 (18-70) to 26 (7-60) in group B, p < 0.05. However, a significant increase in tumour attenuation in all phases was only observed for R0 resected, from 52 HU (26-75) to 65 (35-92) in arterial phase (p < 0.001) and from 62 (36-96) to 78 (40-120) in the venous (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: After neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX, CT predicted resectability with acceptable sensitivity but low specificity. The observation of increased tumour attenuation at CT scan after FOLFIRINOX treatment might represent a reliable predictor of R0 resection. KEY POINTS: • CT drives the assessment of PDAC resectability after FOLFIRINOX • CT predicts resectability with acceptable sensitivity but low specificity • Significant increase in tumour attenuation was only observed for R0 resected PDAC • Tumour attenuation after FOLFIRINOX represents a reliable predictor of R0 resection.
OBJECTIVES: To assess factors associated with radical resection (R0) of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) after induction treatment with FOLFIRINOX. METHODS:Patients with either locally advanced (LA) and borderline resectable (BR) PDAC undergoing surgical exploration after FOLFIRINOX were retrospectively enrolled. Two pancreatic radiologists reviewed the CT blinded to the final outcome and assessed chemotherapy response and resectability. Patients were then divided into R0 resected (group A) and not resected/R1 resected (group B), which were compared. RESULTS: Of 59 patients included, 19 were defined as unresectable (32%), 33 borderline resectable (56%) and 7 resectable (12%) during the blind radiological evaluation after FOLFIRINOX. Once in a surgical setting, 27% were non-resectable, whereas 73% received surgical resection with a 70% R0 rate. Consequent sensitivity and specificity were 86% and 29%. At imaging review, significant decreases in longest tumour dimension were observed in both groups: from 32 mm (95% CI 15-55) to 21 (10-44) in group A and from 34 (18-70) to 26 (7-60) in group B, p < 0.05. However, a significant increase in tumour attenuation in all phases was only observed for R0 resected, from 52 HU (26-75) to 65 (35-92) in arterial phase (p < 0.001) and from 62 (36-96) to 78 (40-120) in the venous (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: After neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX, CT predicted resectability with acceptable sensitivity but low specificity. The observation of increased tumour attenuation at CT scan after FOLFIRINOX treatment might represent a reliable predictor of R0 resection. KEY POINTS: • CT drives the assessment of PDAC resectability after FOLFIRINOX • CT predicts resectability with acceptable sensitivity but low specificity • Significant increase in tumour attenuation was only observed for R0 resected PDAC • Tumour attenuation after FOLFIRINOX represents a reliable predictor of R0 resection.
Authors: Thierry Conroy; Françoise Desseigne; Marc Ychou; Olivier Bouché; Rosine Guimbaud; Yves Bécouarn; Antoine Adenis; Jean-Luc Raoul; Sophie Gourgou-Bourgade; Christelle de la Fouchardière; Jaafar Bennouna; Jean-Baptiste Bachet; Faiza Khemissa-Akouz; Denis Péré-Vergé; Catherine Delbaldo; Eric Assenat; Bruno Chauffert; Pierre Michel; Christine Montoto-Grillot; Michel Ducreux Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-05-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Matthew H G Katz; Robert Marsh; Joseph M Herman; Qian Shi; Eric Collison; Alan P Venook; Hedy L Kindler; Steven R Alberts; Philip Philip; Andrew M Lowy; Peter W T Pisters; Mitchell C Posner; Jordan D Berlin; Syed A Ahmad Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2013-02-23 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Jerome Landry; Paul J Catalano; Charles Staley; Wayne Harris; John Hoffman; Mark Talamonti; Natalie Xu; Harry Cooper; Al B Benson Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2010-06-01 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: R R White; H I Hurwitz; M A Morse; C Lee; M S Anscher; E K Paulson; M R Gottfried; J Baillie; M S Branch; P S Jowell; K M McGrath; B M Clary; T N Pappas; D S Tyler Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Ioannis T Konstantinidis; Andrew L Warshaw; Jill N Allen; Lawrence S Blaszkowsky; Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo; Vikram Deshpande; Theodore S Hong; Eunice L Kwak; Gregory Y Lauwers; David P Ryan; Jennifer A Wargo; Keith D Lillemoe; Cristina R Ferrone Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Darren D D Brennan; Giulia A Zamboni; Vassilios D Raptopoulos; Jonathan B Kruskal Journal: Radiographics Date: 2007 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: Hae Young Kim; Yoon Jin Lee; Won Chang; Jungheum Cho; Ji Hoon Park; Jong-Chan Lee; Jaihwan Kim; Jin-Hyeok Hwang; Young Hoon Kim Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2022-01-15 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Georgios Gemenetzis; Alex B Blair; Minako Nagai; William R Burns; Christopher L Wolfgang; Jin He; Vincent P Groot; Ding Ding; Ammar A Javed; Richard A Burkhart; Elliot K Fishman; Ralph H Hruban; Matthew J Weiss; John L Cameron; Amol Narang; Daniel Laheru; Kelly Lafaro; Joseph M Herman; Lei Zheng Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2021-08-27 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Thomas F Stoop; Eran van Veldhuisen; L Bengt van Rijssen; Remy Klaassen; Oliver J Gurney-Champion; Ignace H de Hingh; Olivier R Busch; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Krijn P van Lienden; Jaap Stoker; Johanna W Wilmink; C Yung Nio; Aart J Nederveen; Marc R W Engelbrecht; Marc G Besselink Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2022-10-15 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: Giampaolo Perri; Laura Prakash; Huamin Wang; Priya Bhosale; Gauri R Varadhachary; Robert Wolff; David Fogelman; Michael Overman; Shubham Pant; Milind Javle; Eugene Koay; Joseph Herman; Michael Kim; Naruhiko Ikoma; Ching-Wei Tzeng; Jeffrey E Lee; Matthew H G Katz Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2021-04-01 Impact factor: 13.787