Literature DB >> 20169476

Phantom evaluation of a cardiac SPECT/VCT system that uses a common set of solid-state detectors for both emission and transmission scans.

Chuanyong Bai1, Richard Conwell, Joel Kindem, Hetal Babla, Mike Gurley, Romer De Los Santos, Rex Old, Randy Weatherhead, Samia Arram, Jamshid Maddahi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We developed a cardiac SPECT system (X-ACT) with low dose volume CT transmission-based attenuation correction (AC). Three solid-state detectors are configured to form a triple-head system for emission scans and reconfigured to form a 69-cm field-of-view detector arc for transmission scans. A near mono-energetic transmission line source is produced from the collimated fluorescence x-ray emitted from a lead target when the target is illuminated by a narrow polychromatic x-ray beam from an x-ray tube. Transmission scans can be completed in 1 min with insignificant patient dose (deep dose equivalent <5 muSv).
METHODS: We used phantom studies to evaluate (1) the accuracy of the reconstructed attenuation maps, (2) the effect of AC on image uniformity, and (3) the effect of AC on defect contrast (DC). The phantoms we used included an ACR phantom, an anthropomorphic phantom with a uniform cardiac insert, and an anthropomorphic phantom with two defects in the cardiac insert.
RESULTS: The reconstructed attenuation coefficient of water at 140 keV was .150 +/- .003/cm in the uniform region of the ACR phantom, .151 +/- .003/cm and .151 +/- .002/cm in the liver and cardiac regions of the anthropomorphic phantom. The ACR phantom images with AC showed correction of the bowing effect due to attenuation in the images without AC (NC). The 17-segment scores of the images of the uniform cardiac insert were 78.3 +/- 6.5 before and 87.9 +/- 3.3 after AC (average +/- standard deviation). The inferior-to-anterior wall ratio and the septal-to-lateral wall ratio were .99 and 1.16 before and 1.02 and 1.00 after AC. The DC of the two defects was .528 and .156 before and .628 and .173 after AC.
CONCLUSION: The X-ACT system generated accurate attenuation maps with 1-minute transmission scans. AC improved image quality and uniformity over NC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20169476      PMCID: PMC2866957          DOI: 10.1007/s12350-010-9204-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  10 in total

1.  Is it time for SPECT attenuation correction?

Authors:  Denny D Watson
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Problems created in attenuation-corrected SPECT images by artifacts in attenuation maps: a simulation study.

Authors:  Anna Celler; Katherine L Dixon; Zheng Chang; Stephan Blinder; John Powe; Ronald Harrop
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Transmission scan truncation with small-field-of-view dedicated cardiac SPECT systems: impact and automated quality control.

Authors:  Ji Chen; James R Galt; James A Case; Jinghan Ye; S James Cullom; Mary K Durbin; Ling Shao; Ernest V Garcia
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Attenuation correction in cardiac SPECT: the boy who cried wolf?

Authors:  Guido Germano; Piotr J Slomka; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Prevalence of misregistration between SPECT and CT for attenuation-corrected myocardial perfusion SPECT.

Authors:  Sibyll Goetze; Richard L Wahl
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 6.  Myocardial perfusion and function: single photon emission computed tomography.

Authors:  Christopher L Hansen; Richard A Goldstein; Olakunle O Akinboboye; Daniel S Berman; Elias H Botvinick; Keith B Churchwell; C David Cooke; James R Corbett; S James Cullom; Seth T Dahlberg; Regina S Druz; Edward P Ficaro; James R Galt; Ravi K Garg; Guido Germano; Gary V Heller; Milena J Henzlova; Mark C Hyun; Lynne L Johnson; April Mann; Benjamin D McCallister; Robert A Quaife; Terrence D Ruddy; Senthil N Sundaram; Raymond Taillefer; R Parker Ward; John J Mahmarian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 7.  SPECT/CT physical principles and attenuation correction.

Authors:  James A Patton; Timothy G Turkington
Journal:  J Nucl Med Technol       Date:  2008-02-20

8.  Prospective multicenter evaluation of rapid, gated SPECT myocardial perfusion upright imaging.

Authors:  Jamshid Maddahi; Ricardo Mendez; John J Mahmarian; Gregory Thomas; Hetal Babla; Chuanyong Bai; Samia Arram; Peter Maffetone; Richard Conwell
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Low event rate for stress-only perfusion imaging in patients evaluated for chest pain.

Authors:  Peter B Gibson; Diane Demus; Richard Noto; William Hudson; Lynne L Johnson
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-03-20       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Attenuation artifact, attenuation correction, and the future of myocardial perfusion SPECT.

Authors:  Bhupinder Singh; Timothy M Bateman; James A Case; Gary Heller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.872

  10 in total
  12 in total

1.  Advances in SPECT camera software and hardware: currently available and new on the horizon.

Authors:  E Gordon DePuey
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  New SPECT technology: potential and challenges.

Authors:  Brian F Hutton
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  Solid-state SPECT technology: fast and furious.

Authors:  Tali Sharir; Piotr J Slomka; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Recent advances in cardiac SPECT instrumentation and system design.

Authors:  Mark F Smith
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 5.  The origins of SPECT and SPECT/CT.

Authors:  Brian F Hutton
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  Quantitative Clinical Nuclear Cardiology, Part 1: Established Applications.

Authors:  Ernest V Garcia; Piotr Slomka; Jonathan B Moody; Guido Germano; Edward P Ficaro
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 7.  Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Guidelines: Instrumentation, Acquisition, Processing, and Interpretation.

Authors:  Sharmila Dorbala; Karthik Ananthasubramaniam; Ian S Armstrong; Panithaya Chareonthaitawee; E Gordon DePuey; Andrew J Einstein; Robert J Gropler; Thomas A Holly; John J Mahmarian; Mi-Ae Park; Donna M Polk; Raymond Russell; Piotr J Slomka; Randall C Thompson; R Glenn Wells
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Contemporary Cardiac SPECT Imaging-Innovations and Best Practices: An Information Statement from the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

Authors:  Brian G Abbott; James A Case; Sharmila Dorbala; Andrew J Einstein; James R Galt; Robert Pagnanelli; Renée P Bullock-Palmer; Prem Soman; R Glenn Wells
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Differences in polar-map patterns using the novel technologies for myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Orazio Zoccarato; Claudio Marcassa; Domenico Lizio; Lucia Leva; Giovanni Lucignani; Annarita Savi; Camilla Scabbio; Roberta Matheoud; Michela Lecchi; Marco Brambilla
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Novel SPECT Technologies and Approaches in Cardiac Imaging.

Authors:  Piotr Slomka; Guang-Uei Hung; Guido Germano; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  Cardiovasc Innov Appl       Date:  2016-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.