Literature DB >> 20163077

Central corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth, and pupil diameter measurements using Visante OCT, Orbscan, and Pentacam.

Ahmet Taylan Yazici1, Ercument Bozkurt, Cengiz Alagoz, Nese Alagoz, Gokhan Pekel, Vedat Kaya, Omer Faruk Yilmaz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the agreement among three different optical methods in measuring anterior chamber depth (ACD), central corneal thickness (CCT), and pupil diameter.
METHODS: One hundred eyes of 50 healthy patients (25 men, 25 women) were enrolled in the study. Mean patient age was 25 years (range: 21 to 32 years). Exclusion criteria were history of any intraocular or corneal surgery, contact lens wear, corneal anomalies, and spherical refraction >5.00 diopters (D) or cylindrical refraction >2.00 D. All measurements were done by the same operator under mesopic light conditions and repeated using three different optical methods: Visante optical coherence tomography (OCT) (Carl Zeiss Meditec), Orbscan (Bausch & Lomb), and Pentacam (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH).
RESULTS: Mean CCT as measured by Visante OCT, Orbscan, and Pentacam was 529+/-30.5 microm, 554+/-32.7 microm, and 552+/-29.3 microm, respectively. Mean ACD values were 2.94+/-0.34 mm, 2.84+/-0.33 mm, and 2.98+/-0.33 mm, respectively. Mean pupil diameter measurements were 4.87+/-1.09 mm, 4.0+/-0.67 mm, and 3.05+/-0.59 mm, respectively. The Visante OCT measured CCT thinner and Orbscan measured ACD shallower than the other two methods. All three methods measured pupil diameters significantly different.
CONCLUSIONS: This study found some statistically significant but clinically insignificant differences among the optical methods assessed. The differences are small and do not influence decisions for refractive surgery in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20163077     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20100121-08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  23 in total

1.  Comparison of the anterior ocular segment measurements using swept-source optical coherent tomography and a scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyzer.

Authors:  Toshie Furuya; Fumihiko Mabuchi; Tatsuya Chiba; Satoshi Kogure; Shigeo Tsukahara; Kenji Kashiwagi
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Lens thickness assessment: anterior segment optical coherence tomography versus A-scan ultrasonography.

Authors:  Nikoo Hamzeh; Sasan Moghimi; Golshan Latifi; Massood Mohammadi; Nassim Khatibi; Shan C Lin
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Anterior chamber depth in normal subjects by rotating scheimpflug imaging.

Authors:  Matthew T Feng; Michael W Belin; Renato Ambrósio; Satinder P S Grewal; Wang Yan; Mohamed S Shaheen; Charles McGhee; Naoyuki Maeda; Tobias H Neuhann; H Burkhard Dick; Saleh A Alageel; Andreas Steinmueller
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-04-30

4.  Repeatability and agreement of central corneal thickness measurement with non-contact methods: a comparative study.

Authors:  Tarannum Mansoori; Nagalla Balakrishna
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 2.031

5.  [Biometry of the anterior eye segment for implantation of phakic anterior chamber lenses. A comparison of current measurement devices].

Authors:  L Kiraly; G Duncker
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 6.  Device interchangeability on anterior chamber depth and white-to-white measurements: a thorough literature review.

Authors:  Alberto Domínguez-Vicent; Cari Pérez-Vives; Teresa Ferrer-Blasco; Santiago García-Lázaro; Robert Montés-Micó
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 1.779

7.  Repeatability assessment of anterior segment biometric measurements under accommodative and nonaccommodative conditions using an anterior segment OCT.

Authors:  Noelia Martínez-Albert; Jose J Esteve-Taboada; Robert Montés-Micó
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  In vivo thickness measurement of the lipid layer and the overall tear film by interferometry.

Authors:  Yuqiang Bai; Jason J Nichols
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 3.776

9.  A Fair Assessment of Evaluation Tools for the Murine Microbead Occlusion Model of Glaucoma.

Authors:  Marie Claes; Joana R F Santos; Luca Masin; Lien Cools; Benjamin M Davis; Lutgarde Arckens; Karl Farrow; Lies De Groef; Lieve Moons
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Comparison of anterior segment optical tomography parameters measured using a semi-automatic software to standard clinical instruments.

Authors:  Marcus Ang; Wesley Chong; Huiqi Huang; Wan Ting Tay; Tien Yin Wong; Ming-Guang He; Tin Aung; Jodhbir S Mehta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.