Literature DB >> 22447421

[Biometry of the anterior eye segment for implantation of phakic anterior chamber lenses. A comparison of current measurement devices].

L Kiraly1, G Duncker.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Implantation of phakic intraocular lenses (pIOL) is gaining in importance. Exact measurement of the anterior chamber is important to assure safe and effective pIOL implantation. In this study six currently available diagnostic devices were tested in order to compare accuracy of measurements (anterior chamber depth and diameter) and ease of handling. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this study 100 eyes from 50 healthy patients were enrolled. All measurements were done by the same operator (L. K.) on the same day and under the same lighting conditions. The following devices were used to measure anterior chamber depth and diameter: IOLMaster 500, Visante OCT, UBM Vumax II, Galilei, Pentacam Classic und Orbscan IIz. Correlations between each method were assessed using Pearson's correlation. Bland Altman plots were composed to evaluate the range of agreement between two methods.
RESULTS: The mean epithelial anterior chamber depth was 3.45 ± 0.38 mm with IOLMaster 500, 3.69 ± 0.33 mm with Visante OCT, 3.59 ± 0.35 mm with Pentacam, 3.67 ± 0,36 mm with Galilei, 3.48 ± 0.38 mm with Orbscan IIz and 3.52 ± 0.34 mm with UBM VumaxII. The mean white-to-white measurements were 11.98 ± 0.37 mm with IOLMaster 500 and 11.71 ± 0.36 mm with Orbscan IIz. The mean angle-to-angle distances were 11.83 ± 0. 43 mm with Visante OCT, 10.73 ± 0.38 mm with Pentacam, 12.30 ± 0.45 mm with Galilei, and 11.15 ± 0.52 mm with UBM Vumax II. In the Bland Altman plots the range of agreement was 0.5 mm between Visante OCT and IOLMaster 500, regarding anterior chamber depth as well as anterior chamber diameter.
CONCLUSION: The IOLMaster 500 provides exact measurement of the anterior chamber depth and diameter and is easy to handle in the daily clinical routine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22447421     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-011-2520-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  29 in total

Review 1.  Optical coherence biometry.

Authors:  Wolfgang Haigis
Journal:  Dev Ophthalmol       Date:  2002

2.  Assessment of anterior chamber depth using Visante optical coherence tomography, slitlamp optical coherence tomography, IOL Master, Pentacam and Orbscan IIz.

Authors:  Umut Asli Dinc; Ebru Gorgun; Banu Oncel; Melda Nursal Yenerel; Levent Alimgil
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 3.250

3.  Comparison of internal anterior chamber diameter imaging modalities: 35-MHz ultrasound biomicroscopy, Visante optical coherence tomography, and Pentacam.

Authors:  Sang-Kyoon Kim; Hyo-Myung Kim; Jong-Suk Song
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement of central anterior chamber depth measurements in pseudophakic and phakic eyes: optical coherence tomography versus ultrasound biomicroscopy.

Authors:  Qi Zhang; Wanqing Jin; Qinmei Wang
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  Anterior segment imaging for glaucoma: OCT or UBM?

Authors:  Hiroshi Ishikawa
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Myopic angle-supported intraocular lenses: two-year follow-up.

Authors:  N Allemann; W Chamon; H M Tanaka; E S Mori; M Campos; P Schor; G Baïkoff
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Assessment and comparison of anterior chamber dimensions using various imaging techniques.

Authors:  Umut Asli Dinc; Banu Oncel; Ebru Gorgun; Melda Nursal Yenerel; Levent Alimgil
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb

8.  [Comparison of different optical techniques for determination of the dimensions of anterior ocular segment].

Authors:  S Lange; W Haigis; H-J Grein; J Schütze
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 0.700

9.  Metaanalysis of cataract development after phakic intraocular lens surgery.

Authors:  Li-Ju Chen; Yun-Jau Chang; Jonathan C Kuo; Rama Rajagopal; Dimitri T Azar
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.351

10.  Comparison of central corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth measurements using three imaging technologies in normal eyes and after phakic intraocular lens implantation.

Authors:  Muriël Doors; Lars P J Cruysberg; Tos T J M Berendschot; John de Brabander; Frenne Verbakel; Carroll A B Webers; Rudy M M A Nuijts
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.