Literature DB >> 20161545

Impact on Image Noise of Incorporating Detector Blurring into Image Reconstruction for a Small Animal PET Scanner.

Kisung Lee, Robert S Miyaoka, Tom K Lewellen, Adam M Alessio, Paul E Kinahan.   

Abstract

We study the noise characteristics of an image reconstruction algorithm that incorporates a model of the non-stationary detector blurring (DB) for a mouse-imaging positron emission tomography (PET) scanner. The algorithm uses ordered subsets expectation maximization (OSEM) image reconstruction, which is used to suppress statistical noise. Including the non-stationary detector blurring in the reconstruction process (OSEM(DB)) has been shown to increase contrast in images reconstructed from measured data acquired on the fully-3D MiCES PET scanner developed at the University of Washington. As an extension, this study uses simulation studies with a fully-3D acquisition mode and our proposed FORE+OSEM(DB) reconstruction process to evaluate the volumetric contrast versus noise trade-offs of this approach. Multiple realizations were simulated to estimate the true noise properties of the algorithm. The results show that incorporation of detector blurring (FORE+OSEM(DB)) into the reconstruction process improves the contrast/noise trade-offs compared to FORE+OSEM in a radially dependent manner. Adding post reconstruction 3D Gaussian smoothing to FORE+OSEM and FORE+OSEM(DB) reduces the contrast versus noise advantages of FORE+OSEM(DB).

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20161545      PMCID: PMC2805005          DOI: 10.1109/tns.2009.2021610

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci        ISSN: 0018-9499            Impact factor:   1.679


  10 in total

1.  Comparison of 3-D maximum a posteriori and filtered backprojection algorithms for high-resolution animal imaging with microPET.

Authors:  A Chatziioannou; J Qi; A Moore; A Annala; K Nguyen; R Leahy; S R Cherry
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Resolution and noise properties of MAP reconstruction for fully 3-D PET.

Authors:  J Qi; R M Leahy
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Quantitative comparison of FBP, EM, and Bayesian reconstruction algorithms for the IndyPET scanner.

Authors:  Thomas Frese; Ned C Rouze; Charles A Bouman; Ken Sauer; Gary D Hutchins
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Noise properties of the EM algorithm: I. Theory.

Authors:  H H Barrett; D W Wilson; B M Tsui
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Pragmatic fully 3D image reconstruction for the MiCES mouse imaging PET scanner.

Authors:  Kisung Lee; Paul E Kinahan; Jeffrey A Fessler; Robert S Miyaoka; Marie Janes; Tom K Lewellen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Noise and edge artifacts in maximum-likelihood reconstructions for emission tomography.

Authors:  D L Snyder; M I Miller; L J Thomas; D G Politte
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Detector response restoration in image reconstruction of high resolution positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Z Liang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Noise analysis of MAP-EM algorithms for emission tomography.

Authors:  W Wang; G Gindi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  High-resolution 3D Bayesian image reconstruction using the microPET small-animal scanner.

Authors:  J Qi; R M Leahy; S R Cherry; A Chatziioannou; T H Farquhar
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Modeling and incorporation of system response functions in 3-D whole body PET.

Authors:  Adam M Alessio; Paul E Kinahan; Thomas K Lewellen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 10.048

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Improved quantification in multiple-pinhole SPECT by anatomy-based reconstruction using microCT information.

Authors:  Christian Vanhove; Michel Defrise; Axel Bossuyt; Tony Lahoutte
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Intra-individual comparison of PET/CT with different body weight-adapted FDG dosage regimens.

Authors:  Jan H Geismar; Paul Stolzmann; Bert-Ram Sah; Irene A Burger; Burkhardt Seifert; Gaspar Delso; Gustav K von Schulthess; Patrick Veit-Haibach; Lars Husmann
Journal:  Acta Radiol Open       Date:  2015-01-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.