Literature DB >> 16393048

Orthographic structure versus morphological structure: principles of lexical organization in a given language.

Ram Frost1, Tamar Kugler, Avital Deutsch, Kenneth I Forster.   

Abstract

Most models of visual word recognition in alphabetic orthographies assume that words are lexically organized according to orthographic similarity. Support for this is provided by form-priming experiments that demonstrate robust facilitation when primes and targets share similar sequences of letters. The authors examined form-orthographic priming effects in Hebrew, Arabic, and English. Hebrew and Arabic have an alphabetic writing system but a Semitic morphological structure. Hebrew morphemic units are composed of noncontiguous phonemic (and letter) sequences in a given word. Results demonstrate that form-priming effects in Hebrew or Arabic are unreliable, whereas morphological priming effects with minimal letter overlap are robust. Hebrew bilingual subjects, by contrast, showed robust form-priming effects with English material, suggesting that Semitic words are lexically organized by morphological rather than orthographic principles. The authors conclude that morphology can constrain lexical organization even in alphabetic orthographies and that visual processing of words is first determined by morphological characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16393048     DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  35 in total

1.  Are all Semitic languages immune to letter transpositions? The case of Maltese.

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Albert Gatt; Carmen Moret-Tatay; Ray Fabri
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

2.  The search for an input-coding scheme: transposed-letter priming in Arabic.

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Reem Abu Mallouh; Manuel Carreiras
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-06

3.  Cambridge University versus Hebrew University: the impact of letter transposition on reading English and Hebrew.

Authors:  Hadas Velan; Ram Frost
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10

4.  The role of the frequency of constituents in compound words: evidence from Basque and Spanish.

Authors:  Jon Andoni Duñabeitia; Manuel Perea; Manuel Carreiras
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-12

5.  L2 Word Recognition: Influence of L1 Orthography on Multi-syllabic Word Recognition.

Authors:  Megumi Hamada
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2017-10

6.  Connectionism and the Role of Morphology in Visual Word Recognition.

Authors:  Jay G Rueckl
Journal:  Ment Lex       Date:  2010-01-01

7.  Does a focus on universals represent a new trend in word recognition?

Authors:  Laurie Beth Feldman; Fermín Moscoso Del Prado Martín
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 12.579

8.  The Separability of Morphological Processes from Semantic Meaning and Syntactic Class in Production of Single Words: Evidence from the Hebrew Root Morpheme.

Authors:  Avital Deutsch
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2016-02

9.  Neurobiological signatures of L2 proficiency: Evidence from a bi-directional cross-linguistic study.

Authors:  Henry Brice; William Einar Mencl; Stephen J Frost; Atira Sara Bick; Jay G Rueckl; Kenneth R Pugh; Ram Frost
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 1.710

10.  Morphological Decomposition in L2 Arabic: A Masked Priming Study.

Authors:  Rebecca Foote; Mousa Qasem; Emma Trentman
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2020-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.