Literature DB >> 18087959

Cambridge University versus Hebrew University: the impact of letter transposition on reading English and Hebrew.

Hadas Velan1, Ram Frost.   

Abstract

Is reading similarly affected by letter transposition in all alphabetic orthographies? "The Cambridge University effect", demonstrating that jumbled letters have little effect on reading, was examined using rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) in English and in Hebrew. Hebrew-English bilinguals were presented sentences in both languages containing words with transposed letters. Sentences were presented rapidly on the screen word by word, and participants had to reproduce the sequence of words perceived. We found a marked difference in the effect of transpositions in the two languages. In English, transpositions had little effect on performance, whereas in Hebrew, performance deteriorated dramatically for words with transposed letters. The differential effects of transposition are accounted for by the difference in lexical organization in Hebrew and in English, suggesting that models of reading in alphabetic orthographies may be language specific.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18087959     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  12 in total

Review 1.  DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud.

Authors:  M Coltheart; K Rastle; C Perry; R Langdon; J Ziegler
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 2.  How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: the SERIOL model and selective literature review.

Authors:  C Whitney
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-06

3.  Does the huamn mnid raed wrods as a wlohe?

Authors:  Jonathan Grainger; Carol Whitney
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Orthographic structure versus morphological structure: principles of lexical organization in a given language.

Authors:  Ram Frost; Tamar Kugler; Avital Deutsch; Kenneth I Forster
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Letter transpositions within and across morphemes.

Authors:  Kiel Christianson; Rebecca L Johnson; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Verbs and nouns are organized and accessed differently in the mental lexicon: evidence from Hebrew.

Authors:  A Deutsch; R Frost; K I Forster
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Repetition blindness: levels of processing.

Authors:  N G Kanwisher; M C Potter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked-priming investigation of morphological representation.

Authors:  R Frost; K I Forster; A Deutsch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Phonological computation and missing vowels: mapping lexical involvement in reading.

Authors:  R Frost
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Letter position dyslexia.

Authors:  N Friedmann; A Gvion
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  29 in total

1.  Are all Semitic languages immune to letter transpositions? The case of Maltese.

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Albert Gatt; Carmen Moret-Tatay; Ray Fabri
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

2.  The search for an input-coding scheme: transposed-letter priming in Arabic.

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Reem Abu Mallouh; Manuel Carreiras
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-06

3.  Subsyllabic structure reflected in letter confusability effects in Korean word recognition.

Authors:  Chang H Lee; Marcus Taft
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-02

4.  Syllable transposition effects in korean word recognition.

Authors:  Chang H Lee; Youan Kwon; Kyungil Kim; Kathleen Rastle
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2015-06

5.  Connectionism and the Role of Morphology in Visual Word Recognition.

Authors:  Jay G Rueckl
Journal:  Ment Lex       Date:  2010-01-01

6.  The Separability of Morphological Processes from Semantic Meaning and Syntactic Class in Production of Single Words: Evidence from the Hebrew Root Morpheme.

Authors:  Avital Deutsch
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2016-02

7.  On the Interaction of Letter Transpositions and Morphemic Boundaries.

Authors:  Jay G Rueckl; Anurag Rimzhim
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2010-08-12

8.  What can we learn from learning models about sensitivity to letter-order in visual word recognition?

Authors:  Itamar Lerner; Blair C Armstrong; Ram Frost
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 3.059

9.  Words with and without internal structure: what determines the nature of orthographic and morphological processing?

Authors:  Hadas Velan; Ram Frost
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-12-15

10.  Towards a universal model of reading.

Authors:  Ram Frost
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 12.579

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.