Literature DB >> 20156571

Effects of low-field magnetic stimulation on brain glucose metabolism.

Nora D Volkow1, Dardo Tomasi, Gene-Jack Wang, Joanna S Fowler, Frank Telang, Ruiliang Wang, Dave Alexoff, Jean Logan, Christopher Wong, Kith Pradhan, Elisabeth C Caparelli, Yeming Ma, Millard Jayne.   

Abstract

Echo planar imaging (EPI), the gold standard technique for functional MRI (fMRI), is based on fast magnetic field gradient switching. These time-varying magnetic fields induce electric (E) fields in the brain that could influence neuronal activity; but this has not been tested. Here we assessed the effects of EPI on brain glucose metabolism (marker of brain function) using PET and 18F 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ((18)FDG). Fifteen healthy subjects were in a 4 T magnet during the (18)FDG uptake period twice: with (ON) and without (OFF) EPI gradients pulses along the z-axis (G(z): 23 mT/m; 250 mus rise-time; 920 Hz). The E-field from these EPI pulses is non-homogeneous, increasing linearly from the gradient's isocenter (radial and z directions), which allowed us to assess the correlation between local strength of the E-field and the regional metabolic differences between ON and OFF sessions. Metabolic images were normalized to metabolic activity in the plane positioned at the gradient's isocenter where E=0 for both ON and OFF conditions. Statistical parametric analyses used to identify regions that differed between ON versus OFF (p<0.05, corrected) showed that the relative metabolism was lower in areas at the poles of the brain (inferior occipital and frontal and superior parietal cortices) for ON than for OFF, which was also documented with individual region of interest analysis. Moreover the magnitude of the metabolic decrements was significantly correlated with the estimated strength of E (r=0.68, p<0.0001); the stronger the E-field the larger the decreases. However, we did not detect differences between ON versus OFF conditions on mood ratings nor on absolute whole brain metabolism. This data provides preliminary evidence that EPI sequences may affect neuronal activity and merits further investigation. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20156571      PMCID: PMC2862488          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  43 in total

1.  Simple linear formulation for magnetostimulation specific to MRI gradient coils.

Authors:  B A Chronik; B K Rutt
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Stream function optimization for gradient coil design.

Authors:  D Tomasi
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Resting brain metabolic activity in a 4 tesla magnetic field.

Authors:  N D Volkow; G J Wang; J S Fowler; W D Rooney; C A Felder; J H Lee; D Franceschi; L Maynard; D J Schlyer; J W Pan; S J Gatley; C S Springer
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 4.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the human brain.

Authors:  M Hallett
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-07-13       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of depression.

Authors:  Ari A Gershon; Pinhas N Dannon; Leon Grunhaus
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 18.112

6.  Asymmetrical gradient coil for head imaging.

Authors:  D Tomasi; R F Xavier; B Foerster; H Panepucci; A Tannús; E L Vidoto
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Opposite effects of high and low frequency rTMS on regional brain activity in depressed patients.

Authors:  A M Speer; T A Kimbrell; E M Wassermann; J D Repella; M W Willis; P Herscovitch; R M Post
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 13.382

8.  50 Hz magnetic field exposure influence on human performance and psychophysiological parameters: two double-blind experimental studies.

Authors:  M Crasson; J J Legros; P Scarpa; W Legros
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.010

9.  Low-intensity repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation decreases motor cortical excitability in humans.

Authors:  Gabrielle Todd; Stanley C Flavel; Michael C Ridding
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2006-05-04

10.  Low-field magnetic stimulation in bipolar depression using an MRI-based stimulator.

Authors:  Michael Rohan; Aimee Parow; Andrew L Stoll; Christina Demopulos; Seth Friedman; Stephen Dager; John Hennen; Bruce M Cohen; Perry F Renshaw
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 18.112

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Somatic treatments for mood disorders.

Authors:  Moacyr A Rosa; Sarah H Lisanby
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 2.  Fundamentals of transcranial electric and magnetic stimulation dose: definition, selection, and reporting practices.

Authors:  Angel V Peterchev; Timothy A Wagner; Pedro C Miranda; Michael A Nitsche; Walter Paulus; Sarah H Lisanby; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  Coil design considerations for deep transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Zhi-De Deng; Sarah H Lisanby; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Effects of cell phone radiofrequency signal exposure on brain glucose metabolism.

Authors:  Nora D Volkow; Dardo Tomasi; Gene-Jack Wang; Paul Vaska; Joanna S Fowler; Frank Telang; Dave Alexoff; Jean Logan; Christopher Wong
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Double-blind, proof-of-concept (POC) trial of Low-Field Magnetic Stimulation (LFMS) augmentation of antidepressant therapy in treatment-resistant depression (TRD).

Authors:  Maurizio Fava; Marlene P Freeman; Martina Flynn; Bettina B Hoeppner; Richard Shelton; Dan V Iosifescu; James W Murrough; David Mischoulon; Cristina Cusin; Mark Rapaport; Boadie W Dunlop; Madhukar H Trivedi; Manish Jha; Gerard Sanacora; Gretchen Hermes; George I Papakostas
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 8.955

6.  Electric field depth-focality tradeoff in transcranial magnetic stimulation: simulation comparison of 50 coil designs.

Authors:  Zhi-De Deng; Sarah H Lisanby; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 8.955

7.  A double-blind pilot dosing study of low field magnetic stimulation (LFMS) for treatment-resistant depression (TRD).

Authors:  Marc J Dubin; Irena P Ilieva; Zhi-De Deng; Jeena Thomas; Ashly Cochran; Kamilla Kravets; Benjamin D Brody; Paul J Christos; James H Kocsis; Conor Liston; Faith M Gunning
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 4.839

8.  Effect of MRI acoustic noise on cerebral fludeoxyglucose uptake in simultaneous MR-PET imaging.

Authors:  Daniel B Chonde; Nasreddin Abolmaali; Grae Arabasz; Alexander R Guimaraes; Ciprian Catana
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 6.016

9.  Electric field measurement of two commercial active/sham coils for transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  J Evan Smith; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 10.  Neuromodulation for mood and memory: from the engineering bench to the patient bedside.

Authors:  Zhi-De Deng; Shawn M McClintock; Nicodemus E Oey; Bruce Luber; Sarah H Lisanby
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 6.627

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.