Literature DB >> 20149974

Pegged versus keeled glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty.

Thomas W Throckmorton1, Peter C Zarkadas, John W Sperling, Robert H Cofield.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: Loosening of the glenoid component is a common complication in shoulder arthroplasty. We proposed to radiographically and clinically investigate the outcomes of keeled and pegged glenoid components to test the hypothesis that these implants would have equivalent performance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred patients undergoing primary shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis were reviewed. Fifty patients had pegged glenoid components, and fifty had keeled components. Standardized radiographs were taken. Preoperative films classified the severity of degenerative change. The postoperative films were analyzed for radiolucent lines and shift in component position-at-risk signs for loosening.
RESULTS: Mean radiographic follow-up was 51.3 months (range, 24-90 months) for the keeled group and 45.7 months (range, 27-98 months) for the pegged group. There were no differences in the degree of preoperative arthritic change between groups. Both groups had significant improvement in motion and pain (P < .001) postoperatively, with no differences in clinical outcome between cohorts (P > or = .20). Initial radiographs showed no radiolucencies around the pegs in 46 implants or around the keel in 49 components. At final follow-up, 10 glenoid implants were found to be at risk for loosening, 6 (12%) in the pegged group and 4 (8%) in the keeled group (P = .74).
CONCLUSIONS: Initial postoperative radiographs with pegged and keeled components show a low rate of radiolucent lines. These radiolucencies develop over time. However, there is no difference in clinical or radiographic outcomes between pegged and keeled components at intermediate-term follow-up. 2010 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20149974     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.10.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  20 in total

1.  Arthroscopic Removal of a Polyethylene Glenoid Component in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Arne J Venjakob; Frank Reichwein; Wolfgang Nebelung
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2015-04-06

2.  Management of complications after revision shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hithem Rahmi; Andrew Jawa
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-03

3.  Evaluation of thirty eight cemented pegged glenoid components with variable backside curvature: two-year minimum follow-up.

Authors:  Florence Dauzère; Marine Arboucalot; Julie Lebon; Fanny Elia; Nicolas Bonnevialle; Pierre Mansat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Multi-patient finite element simulation of keeled versus pegged glenoid implant designs in shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Werner Pomwenger; Karl Entacher; Herbert Resch; Peter Schuller-Götzburg
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 5.  Glenoid or not glenoid component in primary osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Kany Jean
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2012-11-30

6.  No differences in early results of a hybrid glenoid compared with a pegged implant.

Authors:  Lawrence V Gulotta; K Lauchlan Chambers; Russell F Warren; David M Dines; Edward V Craig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Radiostereometric analysis of keeled versus pegged glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty: a randomized feasibility study.

Authors:  Trevor C Gascoyne; Sheila M B McRae; Sara L Parashin; Jeff R S Leiter; Martin J Petrak; Eric R Bohm; Peter B MacDonald
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Radiologic midterm results of cemented and uncemented glenoid components in primary osteoarthritis of the shoulder: a matched pair analysis.

Authors:  Petra Magosch; Peter Habermeyer; Philipp Vetter
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  Number of pegs influence focal stress distributions and micromotion in glenoid implants: a finite element study.

Authors:  Abdul Hadi Abdul Wahab; Mohammed Rafiq Abdul Kadir; Muhammad Noor Harun; Tunku Kamarul; Ardiyansyah Syahrom
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  Computed tomography quantification of bone density adjacent to cemented pegged polyethylene glenoid components in shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Giovanni Merolla; Barbara Amore; Paolo Paladini; Enrico Cavagna; Giuseppe Porcellini
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-11-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.