Literature DB >> 20149908

Effects of trabecular type and orientation on microdamage susceptibility in trabecular bone.

Xiutao Shi1, X Sherry Liu, Xiang Wang, X Edward Guo, Glen L Niebur.   

Abstract

Trabecular architecture becomes more rod-like and anisotropic in osteoporotic and aging trabecular bone. In order to address the effects of trabecular type and orientation on trabecular bone damage mechanics, microstructural finite element modeling was used to identify the yielded tissue in ten bovine tibial trabecular bone samples compressed to 1.2% on-axis apparent strain. The yielded tissue was mapped onto individual trabeculae identified by an Individual Trabeculae Segmentation (ITS) technique, and the distribution of the predicted yielding among trabecular types and orientations was compared to the experimentally measured microdamage. Although most of the predicted yielded tissue was found in longitudinal plates (73+/-11%), the measured microcrack density was positively correlated with the proportion of the yielded tissue in longitudinal rods (R(2)=0.52, p=0.02), but not in rods of other directions or plates. The overall fraction of rods and the fractions of rods along the longitudinal and transverse axes were also correlated with the measured microcrack density. In contrast, diffuse damage area did not correlate with any of these quantities. These results agree with the findings that both in vitro and in vivo microcrack densities are correlated with Structure Model Index (SMI), and are also consistent with decreased energy to failure in more rod-like trabecular bone. Together the results suggest that bending or buckling deformations of rod-like trabeculae may make trabecular structures more susceptible to microdamage formation. Moreover, while simple strain-based tissue yield criteria may account for macroscopic yielding, they may not be suitable for identifying damage. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20149908      PMCID: PMC2854282          DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2010.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  53 in total

1.  Influence of nonenzymatic glycation on biomechanical properties of cortical bone.

Authors:  D Vashishth; G J Gibson; J I Khoury; M B Schaffler; J Kimura; D P Fyhrie
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue.

Authors:  Harun H Bayraktar; Elise F Morgan; Glen L Niebur; Grayson E Morris; Eric K Wong; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  The effect of bone loss on rod-like and plate-like trabeculae in the cancellous bone of the mandibular condyle.

Authors:  L J van Ruijven; E B W Giesen; L Mulder; M Farella; T M G J van Eijden
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Effects of non-enzymatic glycation on cancellous bone fragility.

Authors:  S Y Tang; U Zeenath; D Vashishth
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Complete volumetric decomposition of individual trabecular plates and rods and its morphological correlations with anisotropic elastic moduli in human trabecular bone.

Authors:  X Sherry Liu; Paul Sajda; Punam K Saha; Felix W Wehrli; Grant Bevill; Tony M Keaveny; X Edward Guo
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  A new method to determine trabecular bone elastic properties and loading using micromechanical finite-element models.

Authors:  B van Rietbergen; H Weinans; R Huiskes; A Odgaard
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Influence of bone volume fraction and architecture on computed large-deformation failure mechanisms in human trabecular bone.

Authors:  Grant Bevill; Senthil K Eswaran; Atul Gupta; Panayiotis Papadopoulos; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Damage in trabecular bone at small strains.

Authors:  Elise F Morgan; Oscar C Yeh; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  Eur J Morphol       Date:  2005 Feb-Apr

9.  Density and architecture have greater effects on the toughness of trabecular bone than damage.

Authors:  Jacqueline G Garrison; Constance L Slaboch; Glen L Niebur
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Age-related differences between thinning of horizontal and vertical trabeculae in human lumbar bone as assessed by a new computerized method.

Authors:  J S Thomsen; E N Ebbesen; L I Mosekilde
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  32 in total

Review 1.  New advances in imaging osteoporosis and its complications.

Authors:  James F Griffith; Harry K Genant
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.633

2.  Cylinders or walls? A new computational model to estimate the MR transverse relaxation rate dependence on trabecular bone architecture.

Authors:  Bernd Müller-Bierl; Olivia Louis; Yves Fierens; Nico Buls; Robert Luypaert; Johan de Mey
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Age-related differences in the morphology of microdamage propagation in trabecular bone.

Authors:  Jessica O Green; Jason Wang; Tamim Diab; Brani Vidakovic; Robert E Guldberg
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Methodological approach for the detection of both microdamage and fluorochrome labels in ewe bone and human trabecular bone.

Authors:  Brigitte Burt-Pichat; Hélène Follet; Gwendoline Toulemonde; Monique Arlot; Pierre Delmas; Roland Chapurlat
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Morphology analysis of vertebral trabecular bone under dynamic loading based on multi-scale theory.

Authors:  Khairul Salleh Basaruddin; Naoki Takano; Yuto Yoshiwara; Takayoshi Nakano
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Shear strength and toughness of trabecular bone are more sensitive to density than damage.

Authors:  Jacqueline G Garrison; Joshua A Gargac; Glen L Niebur
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Vertebral fragility and structural redundancy.

Authors:  Aaron J Fields; Shashank Nawathe; Senthil K Eswaran; Michael G Jekir; Mark F Adams; Panayiotis Papadopoulos; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  In vivo microdamage is an indicator of susceptibility to initiation and propagation of microdamage in human femoral trabecular bone.

Authors:  Ziheng Wu; Anthony J Laneve; Glen L Niebur
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  A closer look at the immediate trabecula response to combined parathyroid hormone and alendronate treatment.

Authors:  Allison R Altman; Wei-Ju Tseng; Chantal M J de Bakker; Beom Kang Huh; Abhishek Chandra; Ling Qin; X Sherry Liu
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Shear strength behavior of human trabecular bone.

Authors:  Arnav Sanyal; Atul Gupta; Harun H Bayraktar; Ronald Y Kwon; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.