Literature DB >> 20148289

A successful implementation of e-epidemiology: the Danish pregnancy planning study 'Snart-Gravid'.

Krista F Huybrechts1, Ellen M Mikkelsen, Tina Christensen, Anders H Riis, Elizabeth E Hatch, Lauren A Wise, Henrik Toft Sørensen, Kenneth J Rothman.   

Abstract

The attraction of being able to use the internet for the recruitment of an epidemiologic cohort stems mainly from cost efficiency and convenience. The pregnancy planning study ('Snart-Gravid')-a prospective cohort study of Danish women planning a pregnancy-was conducted to evaluate the feasibility and cost efficiency of using internet-based recruitment and follow-up. Feasibility was assessed by examining patient accrual data over time, questionnaire-specific response rates and losses to follow-up. The relative cost efficiency was examined by comparing the study costs with those of an alternative non internet-based study approach. The target recruitment of 2,500 participants over 6 months was achieved using advertisements on a health-related website, supported by a coordinated media strategy at study initiation. Questionnaire cycle-specific response rates ranged from 87 to 90% over the 12-month follow-up. At 6 months, 87% of women had a known outcome or were still under follow-up; at 12 months the figure was 82%. The study cost of $400,000 ($160 per enrolled subject) compared favorably with the estimated cost to conduct the same study using a conventional non-internet based approach ($322 per subject). The gain in efficiency with the internet-based approach appeared to be even more substantial with longer follow-up and larger study sizes. The successful conduct of this pilot study suggests that the internet may be a useful tool to recruit and follow subjects in prospective cohort studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20148289      PMCID: PMC2945880          DOI: 10.1007/s10654-010-9431-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0393-2990            Impact factor:   8.082


  23 in total

1.  Epidemiology. When an entire country is a cohort.

Authors:  L Frank
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-03-31       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Regional differences in waiting time to pregnancy: pregnancy-based surveys from Denmark, France, Germany, Italy and Sweden. The European Infertility and Subfecundity Study Group.

Authors:  S Juul; W Karmaus; J Olsen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Does low participation in cohort studies induce bias?

Authors:  Ellen Aagaard Nohr; Morten Frydenberg; Tine Brink Henriksen; Jorn Olsen
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Participation in population studies.

Authors:  Patricia Hartge
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  Data collected on maternal dietary exposures in the Danish National Birth Cohort.

Authors:  Sjúrdur Fródi Olsen; Tina Broby Mikkelsen; Vibeke Kildegaard Knudsen; Ivanka Orozova-Bekkevold; Thórhallur Ingi Halldórsson; Marin Strøm; Marie Louise Osterdal
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.980

6.  A follow-up study of environmental and biologic determinants of fertility among 430 Danish first-pregnancy planners: design and methods.

Authors:  J P Bonde; N H Hjollund; T K Jensen; E Ernst; H Kolstad; T B Henriksen; A Giwercman; N E Skakkebaek; A M Andersson; J Olsen
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.143

7.  Risk perception among women receiving genetic counseling: a population-based follow-up study.

Authors:  Ellen M Mikkelsen; Lone Sunde; Christoffer Johansen; Søren P Johnsen
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  2007

8.  Postmenopausal estrogen therapy and cardiovascular disease. Ten-year follow-up from the nurses' health study.

Authors:  M J Stampfer; G A Colditz; W C Willett; J E Manson; B Rosner; F E Speizer; C H Hennekens
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-09-12       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  New times, new needs; e-epidemiology.

Authors:  Alexandra Ekman; Jan-Eric Litton
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 12.434

10.  Declining trends in conception rates in recent birth cohorts of native Danish women: a possible role of deteriorating male reproductive health.

Authors:  Tina Kold Jensen; Tomás Sobotka; Martin A Hansen; Anette Tønnes Pedersen; Wolfgang Lutz; Niels E Skakkebaek
Journal:  Int J Androl       Date:  2007-11-01
View more
  52 in total

1.  Caffeinated beverage and soda consumption and time to pregnancy.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Hatch; Lauren A Wise; Ellen M Mikkelsen; Tina Christensen; Anders H Riis; Henrik Toft Sørensen; Kenneth J Rothman
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 2.  Identifying Complementary and Alternative Medicine Usage Information from Internet Resources. A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Vivekanand Sharma; John H Holmes; Indra N Sarkar
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 2.176

3.  A prospective cohort study of menstrual characteristics and time to pregnancy.

Authors:  Lauren A Wise; Ellen M Mikkelsen; Kenneth J Rothman; Anders H Riis; Henrik Toft Sørensen; Krista F Huybrechts; Elizabeth E Hatch
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Generating large-scale longitudinal data resources for aging research.

Authors:  John Gallacher; Scott M Hofer
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.077

5.  Next steps for birth defects research and prevention: The birth defects study to evaluate pregnancy exposures (BD-STEPS).

Authors:  Sarah C Tinker; Suzan L Carmichael; Marlene Anderka; Marilyn L Browne; Kristin M Caspers Conway; Robert E Meyer; Wendy N Nembhard; Richard S Olney; Jennita Reefhuis
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2015-04-06

Review 6.  Is human fecundity changing? A discussion of research and data gaps precluding us from having an answer.

Authors:  Melissa M Smarr; Katherine J Sapra; Alison Gemmill; Linda G Kahn; Lauren A Wise; Courtney D Lynch; Pam Factor-Litvak; Sunni L Mumford; Niels E Skakkebaek; Rémy Slama; Danelle T Lobdell; Joseph B Stanford; Tina Kold Jensen; Elizabeth Heger Boyle; Michael L Eisenberg; Paul J Turek; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Marie E Thoma; Germaine M Buck Louis
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  A prospective cohort study of physical activity and time to pregnancy.

Authors:  Lauren A Wise; Kenneth J Rothman; Ellen M Mikkelsen; Henrik Toft Sørensen; Anders H Riis; Elizabeth E Hatch
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Iron Consumption Is Not Consistently Associated with Fecundability among North American and Danish Pregnancy Planners.

Authors:  Kristen A Hahn; Amelia K Wesselink; Lauren A Wise; Ellen M Mikkelsen; Heidi T Cueto; Katherine L Tucker; Marco Vinceti; Kenneth J Rothman; Henrik Toft Sorensen; Elizabeth E Hatch
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 4.798

9.  Evaluation of Selection Bias in an Internet-based Study of Pregnancy Planners.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Hatch; Kristen A Hahn; Lauren A Wise; Ellen M Mikkelsen; Ramya Kumar; Matthew P Fox; Daniel R Brooks; Anders H Riis; Henrik Toft Sorensen; Kenneth J Rothman
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.822

10.  Comparison of web versus interview participants in a case-control study.

Authors:  Mahsa M Yazdy; Martha M Werler
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.797

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.