John Gallacher1, Scott M Hofer. 1. Department of Primary Care & Public Health, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4YS, UK. gallacher@cf.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The need for large studies and the types of large-scale data resources (LSDRs) are discussed along with their general scientific utility, role in aging research, and affordability. The diversification of approaches to large-scale data resourcing is described in order to facilitate their use in aging research. METHODS: The need for LSDRs is discussed in terms of (a) large sample size; (b) longitudinal design; (c) as platforms for additional investigator-initiated research projects; and (d) broad-based access to core genetic, biological, and phenotypic data. DISCUSSION: It is concluded that a "lite-touch, lo-tech, lo-cost" approach to LSDRs is a viable strategy for the development of LSDRs and would enhance the likelihood of LSDRs being established which are dedicated to the wide range of important aging-related issues.
OBJECTIVES: The need for large studies and the types of large-scale data resources (LSDRs) are discussed along with their general scientific utility, role in aging research, and affordability. The diversification of approaches to large-scale data resourcing is described in order to facilitate their use in aging research. METHODS: The need for LSDRs is discussed in terms of (a) large sample size; (b) longitudinal design; (c) as platforms for additional investigator-initiated research projects; and (d) broad-based access to core genetic, biological, and phenotypic data. DISCUSSION: It is concluded that a "lite-touch, lo-tech, lo-cost" approach to LSDRs is a viable strategy for the development of LSDRs and would enhance the likelihood of LSDRs being established which are dedicated to the wide range of important aging-related issues.
Authors: Krista F Huybrechts; Ellen M Mikkelsen; Tina Christensen; Anders H Riis; Elizabeth E Hatch; Lauren A Wise; Henrik Toft Sørensen; Kenneth J Rothman Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2010-02-11 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Parminder S Raina; Christina Wolfson; Susan A Kirkland; Lauren E Griffith; Mark Oremus; Christopher Patterson; Holly Tuokko; Margaret Penning; Cynthia M Balion; David Hogan; Andrew Wister; Hélène Payette; Harry Shannon; Kevin Brazil Journal: Can J Aging Date: 2009-09
Authors: John Gallacher; Anthony Bayer; Mark Fish; Janet Pickering; Sofia Pedro; Frank Dunstan; Shah Ebrahim; Yoav Ben-Shlomo Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2009-06-24 Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Paul R Burton; Anna L Hansell; Isabel Fortier; Teri A Manolio; Muin J Khoury; Julian Little; Paul Elliott Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2008-08-01 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Luisa Zuccolo; Nicola Fitz-Simon; Ron Gray; Susan M Ring; Kapil Sayal; George Davey Smith; Sarah J Lewis Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2009-08-17 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Emily C Duggan; Andrea M Piccinin; Sean Clouston; Andriy V Koval; Annie Robitaille; Andrea R Zammit; Chenkai Wu; Cassandra L Brown; Lewina O Lee; Deborah Finkel; William H Beasley; Jeffrey Kaye; Graciela Muniz Terrera; Mindy Katz; Richard B Lipton; Dorly Deeg; David A Bennett; Marcus Praetorius Björk; Boo Johansson; Avron Spiro; Jennifer Weuve; Scott M Hofer Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2019-10-04 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Isabel Fortier; Parminder Raina; Edwin R Van den Heuvel; Lauren E Griffith; Camille Craig; Matilda Saliba; Dany Doiron; Ronald P Stolk; Bartha M Knoppers; Vincent Ferretti; Peter Granda; Paul Burton Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Nancy Poole; Rose A Schmidt; Alan Bocking; Julie Bergeron; Isabel Fortier Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-06-06 Impact factor: 3.390