Peggy Magarian1, Bernhard Sterling. 1. OptiScan Biomedical Corporation, Hayward, California 94545, USA. pmagarian@optiscancorp.com
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Four randomized controlled trials have compared mortality and morbidity of tight glycemic control versus conventional glucose for intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Two trials showed a positive outcome. However, one single-center trial and a large multicenter trial had negative results. The positive trials used accurate portable lab analyzers. The negative trial allowed the use of meters. The portable analyzer measures in filtered plasma, minimizing the interference effects. OptiScan Biomedical Corporation is developing a continuous glucose monitor using centrifuged plasma and mid-infrared spectroscopy for use in ICU medicine. The OptiScanner draws approximately 0.1 ml of blood every 15 min and creates a centrifuged plasma sample. Internal quality control minimizes sample preparation error. Interference adjustment using this technique has been presented at the Society of Critical Care Medicine in separate studies since 2006. METHOD: A good laboratory practice study was conducted on three Yorkshire pigs using a central venous catheter over 6 h while performing a glucose challenge. Matching Yellow Springs Instrument glucose readings were obtained. RESULTS: Some 95.7% of the predicted values were in the Clarke Error Grid A zone and 4.3% in the B zone. Of those in the B zone, all were within 3.3% of the A zone boundaries. The coefficient of determination (R(2)) was 0.993. The coefficient of variance was 5.02%. Animal necropsy and blood panels demonstrated safety. CONCLUSION: The OptiScanner investigational device performed safely and accurately in an animal model. Human studies using the device will begin soon.
INTRODUCTION: Four randomized controlled trials have compared mortality and morbidity of tight glycemic control versus conventional glucose for intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Two trials showed a positive outcome. However, one single-center trial and a large multicenter trial had negative results. The positive trials used accurate portable lab analyzers. The negative trial allowed the use of meters. The portable analyzer measures in filtered plasma, minimizing the interference effects. OptiScan Biomedical Corporation is developing a continuous glucose monitor using centrifuged plasma and mid-infrared spectroscopy for use in ICU medicine. The OptiScanner draws approximately 0.1 ml of blood every 15 min and creates a centrifuged plasma sample. Internal quality control minimizes sample preparation error. Interference adjustment using this technique has been presented at the Society of Critical Care Medicine in separate studies since 2006. METHOD: A good laboratory practice study was conducted on three Yorkshire pigs using a central venous catheter over 6 h while performing a glucose challenge. Matching Yellow Springs Instrument glucose readings were obtained. RESULTS: Some 95.7% of the predicted values were in the Clarke Error Grid A zone and 4.3% in the B zone. Of those in the B zone, all were within 3.3% of the A zone boundaries. The coefficient of determination (R(2)) was 0.993. The coefficient of variance was 5.02%. Animal necropsy and blood panels demonstrated safety. CONCLUSION: The OptiScanner investigational device performed safely and accurately in an animal model. Human studies using the device will begin soon.
Authors: G van den Berghe; P Wouters; F Weekers; C Verwaest; F Bruyninckx; M Schetz; D Vlasselaers; P Ferdinande; P Lauwers; R Bouillon Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-11-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Simon Finfer; Dean R Chittock; Steve Yu-Shuo Su; Deborah Blair; Denise Foster; Vinay Dhingra; Rinaldo Bellomo; Deborah Cook; Peter Dodek; William R Henderson; Paul C Hébert; Stephane Heritier; Daren K Heyland; Colin McArthur; Ellen McDonald; Imogen Mitchell; John A Myburgh; Robyn Norton; Julie Potter; Bruce G Robinson; Juan J Ronco Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-03-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Dirk Vlasselaers; Ilse Milants; Lars Desmet; Pieter J Wouters; Ilse Vanhorebeek; Ingeborg van den Heuvel; Dieter Mesotten; Michael P Casaer; Geert Meyfroidt; Catherine Ingels; Jan Muller; Sophie Van Cromphaut; Miet Schetz; Greet Van den Berghe Journal: Lancet Date: 2009-01-26 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Elizabeth A Mann; Heather F Pidcoke; Jose Salinas; John B Holcomb; Steven E Wolf; Charles E Wade Journal: J Burn Care Res Date: 2008 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 1.845
Authors: Anthony P Furnary; Guangqiang Gao; Gary L Grunkemeier; YingXing Wu; Kathryn J Zerr; Stephen O Bookin; H Storm Floten; Albert Starr Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Franz Feichtner; Julia K Mader; Roland Schaller; Lukas Schaupp; Martin Ellmerer; Stefan Korsatko; Venkata R Kondepati; H Michael Heise; Malgorzata E Wilinska; Roman Hovorka; Thomas R Pieber Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2011-07-01
Authors: Roosmarijn Tm van Hooijdonk; Tineke Winters; Johan C Fischer; Edmée C van Dongen-Lases; James S Krinsley; Jean-Charles Preiser; Marcus J Schultz Journal: Ann Intensive Care Date: 2014-03-06 Impact factor: 6.925