Fanny Schierenbeck1, Anders Franco-Cereceda, Jan Liska. 1. Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Section of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Anaesthesiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. fanny.schierenbeck@ki.se
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Glycemic control in critically ill patients has been shown to be beneficial. In this prospective study, we evaluated the accuracy and technical feasibility of a continuous glucose monitoring system using intravascular microdialysis. METHOD: Fifty patients undergoing cardiac surgery were monitored using a 4 Fr intravenous microdialysis catheter (Eirus SLC™, Dipylon Medical AB, Solna, Sweden) percutaneously placed with the tip of the catheter positioned in the superior vena cava. The catheter was connected to the Eirus™ monitoring system, and the patients were monitored for up to 48 h postoperatively in the intensive care unit (ICU). As reference, arterial blood samples were taken every hour and analyzed in a blood gas analyzer. RESULTS: Data were available from 48 patients. A total of 994 paired (arterial blood gas microdialysis) samples were obtained. Glucose correlation coefficient (R2) was 0.85. Using Clarke error grid analysis, 100% of the paired samples were in region AB, and 99% were in region A. Mean glucose level was 8.3 mmol/liter (149 mg/dl), mean relative difference was 0.2%, and mean absolute relative difference was 5%. A total of 99.2% of the paired samples were correct according to International Organization for Standardization (ISO) criteria. Bland-Altman analysis showed that bias ± limits of agreement were 0.02 ± 1.1 mmol/liter (0.36 ± 20 mg/dl). CONCLUSIONS: Central venous microdialysis using the Eirus monitoring system is a highly accurate and reliable method for continuous blood glucose monitoring up to 48 h in ICU patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The system may thus be useful in critically ill ICU patients.
BACKGROUND: Glycemic control in critically illpatients has been shown to be beneficial. In this prospective study, we evaluated the accuracy and technical feasibility of a continuous glucose monitoring system using intravascular microdialysis. METHOD: Fifty patients undergoing cardiac surgery were monitored using a 4 Fr intravenous microdialysis catheter (Eirus SLC™, Dipylon Medical AB, Solna, Sweden) percutaneously placed with the tip of the catheter positioned in the superior vena cava. The catheter was connected to the Eirus™ monitoring system, and the patients were monitored for up to 48 h postoperatively in the intensive care unit (ICU). As reference, arterial blood samples were taken every hour and analyzed in a blood gas analyzer. RESULTS: Data were available from 48 patients. A total of 994 paired (arterial blood gas microdialysis) samples were obtained. Glucose correlation coefficient (R2) was 0.85. Using Clarke error grid analysis, 100% of the paired samples were in region AB, and 99% were in region A. Mean glucose level was 8.3 mmol/liter (149 mg/dl), mean relative difference was 0.2%, and mean absolute relative difference was 5%. A total of 99.2% of the paired samples were correct according to International Organization for Standardization (ISO) criteria. Bland-Altman analysis showed that bias ± limits of agreement were 0.02 ± 1.1 mmol/liter (0.36 ± 20 mg/dl). CONCLUSIONS: Central venous microdialysis using the Eirus monitoring system is a highly accurate and reliable method for continuous blood glucose monitoring up to 48 h in ICU patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The system may thus be useful in critically ill ICUpatients.
Authors: G van den Berghe; P Wouters; F Weekers; C Verwaest; F Bruyninckx; M Schetz; D Vlasselaers; P Ferdinande; P Lauwers; R Bouillon Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-11-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Greet Van den Berghe; Alexander Wilmer; Greet Hermans; Wouter Meersseman; Pieter J Wouters; Ilse Milants; Eric Van Wijngaerden; Herman Bobbaers; Roger Bouillon Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-02-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Gunjan Y Gandhi; Gregory A Nuttall; Martin D Abel; Charles J Mullany; Hartzell V Schaff; Brent A Williams; Lisa M Schrader; Robert A Rizza; M Molly McMahon Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Anthony P Furnary; Guangqiang Gao; Gary L Grunkemeier; YingXing Wu; Kathryn J Zerr; Stephen O Bookin; H Storm Floten; Albert Starr Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Nam K Tran; Zachary R Godwin; Amanda N Steele; Steven E Wolf; Tina L Palmieri Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 3.624