Literature DB >> 20140620

Subcutaneous Redon drains do not reduce the incidence of surgical site infections after laparotomy. A randomized controlled trial on 200 patients.

Peter K Baier1, Nadine C Glück, Ulrich Baumgartner, Ulrich Adam, Andreas Fischer, Ulrich T Hopt.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Surgical site infections (SSI) cause excess morbidity and mortality in modern surgery. Several different approaches to reduce the incidence of SSI have been investigated with variable results.
METHOD: This is to our knowledge the first systematic randomized evaluation in patients undergoing laparotomy in visceral surgery to clarify whether widely used subcutaneous drains (Redon) affect wound infection as the primary outcome measure.
RESULTS: In 200 patients, we were unable to show a statistically significant impact on the postoperative healing process in patients with the full variety of abdominal surgical interventions. Overall, we observed surgical site infection in 9.5% of all patients (n = 19), of these n = 9 (47.4%) were in the control group without a drain, and 10 (52.6%) were in the experimental group with a Redon drain (not significant).
CONCLUSION: As this study could not demonstrate a reduction of SSI by the use of Redon drains, there is no indication for prophylactic subcutaneous suction drains after laparotomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20140620     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-010-0884-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  11 in total

1.  Subcutaneous stitch closure versus subcutaneous drain to prevent wound disruption after cesarean delivery: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Everett F Magann; Suneet P Chauhan; Sheryl Rodts-Palenik; Laura Bufkin; James N Martin; John C Morrison
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  [Closure under reduced atmospheric pressure of extensive wounds].

Authors:  H REDON
Journal:  Mem Acad Chir (Paris)       Date:  1954 Mar 24-Apr 7

3.  Laparoscope use and surgical site infections in digestive surgery.

Authors:  Sébastien Romy; Marie-Christine Eisenring; Vincent Bettschart; Christiane Petignat; Patrick Francioli; Nicolas Troillet
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  [Complications and risks of suction drainage].

Authors:  H P Werner
Journal:  Z Gesamte Hyg       Date:  1990-02

5.  [Value of subcutaneous drainage in repair of primary inguinal hernia. A prospective randomized study of 100 cases].

Authors:  C Peiper; J Conze; N Ponschek; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  Randomized clinical trial of diathermy versus scalpel incision in elective midline laparotomy.

Authors:  S R Kearns; E M Connolly; S McNally; D A McNamara; J Deasy
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee.

Authors:  A J Mangram; T C Horan; M L Pearson; L C Silver; W R Jarvis
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.918

8.  [Muscular changes caused by suction drainage. Scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, light microscopy and morphometric studies of dorsal muscles of the rat (Rattus rattus) using drainage].

Authors:  J Graf; E Stofft; K Tittel
Journal:  Unfallchirurgie       Date:  1983-08

9.  Subcutaneous drainage versus no drainage after minilaparotomy in gynecologic benign conditions: a randomized study.

Authors:  Pierluigi Benedetti Panici; Marzio Angelo Zullo; Beniamino Casalino; Roberto Angioli; Ludovico Muzii
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  A bacteriologic study comparing closed suction and simple conduit drainage.

Authors:  J J Raves; M Slifkin; D L Diamond
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  20 in total

1.  Effects of minimizing access trauma in laparoscopic colectomy in patients with IBD.

Authors:  Claudia Seifarth; Joerg-Peter Ritz; Anton Kroesen; Heinz J Buhr; Joern Groene
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Ring drape do not protect against surgical site infections in colorectal surgery: a randomised controlled study.

Authors:  Peter Baier; Marina Kiesel; Carolin Kayser; Andreas Fischer; Ulrich T Hopt; Stefan Utzolino
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  A multi-disciplinary review of the potential association between closed-suction drains and surgical site infection.

Authors:  Alyssa J Reiffel; Philip S Barie; Jason A Spector
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 2.150

4.  Subcutaneous suction drains do not prevent surgical site infections in clean-contaminated abdominal surgery-results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Diego Coletta; Celeste Del Basso; Giuseppe Giuliani; Francesco Guerra
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Efficacy of subcutaneous penrose drains for surgical site infections in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Shinya Imada; Shingo Noura; Masayuki Ohue; Tatsushi Shingai; Toshinori Sueda; Kentaro Kishi; Terumasa Yamada; Hiroaki Ohigashi; Masahiko Yano; Osamu Ishikawa
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-04-27

6.  Letter to the Editor regarding "Prophylactic subcutaneous drainage reduces post-operative incisional infections in colorectal surgeries: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials".

Authors:  Diego Coletta; Celeste Del Basso; Giuseppe Giuliani; Francesco Guerra
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  A prospective randomized controlled trial of subcutaneous passive drainage for the prevention of superficial surgical site infections in open and laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Masakatsu Numata; Teni Godai; Junya Shirai; Kazuteru Watanabe; Daisuke Inagaki; Shinichi Hasegawa; Tsutomu Sato; Takashi Oshima; Shoichi Fujii; Chikara Kunisaki; Norio Yukawa; Yasushi Rino; Masataka Taguri; Satoshi Morita; Munetaka Masuda
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Effects of subcutaneous drain for the prevention of incisional SSI in high-risk patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Takaaki Fujii; Yuichi Tabe; Reina Yajima; Satoru Yamaguchi; Soichi Tsutsumi; Takayuki Asao; Hiroyuki Kuwano
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Subcutaneous vacuum drains reduce surgical site infection after primary closure of defunctioning ileostomy.

Authors:  Hong-Da Pan; Lin Wang; Yi-Fan Peng; Ming Li; Yun-Feng Yao; Jun Zhao; Tian-Cheng Zhan; Chang-Zheng Du; Jin Gu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Necessity of subcutaneous suction drains in ileostomy reversal (DRASTAR)-a randomized, controlled bi-centered trial.

Authors:  J C Lauscher; V Schneider; L D Lee; A Stroux; H J Buhr; M E Kreis; J P Ritz
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 3.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.