Literature DB >> 24816032

Tracking the pharmaceutical pipeline: clinical trials and global disease burden.

Marci D Cottingham1, Corey A Kalbaugh, Jill A Fisher.   

Abstract

Aggregate data about pharmaceutical research and development (R&D) tend to examine Phase III trials. Hence, there are few published data about investigational drugs in earlier phases of clinical development that might fail. It is also unclear how well R&D corresponds to disease burden. We track the pharmaceutical pipeline using data from industry publications that provide otherwise unreported information about industry-sponsored clinical trials. The sample includes 2,477 unique drug entities in 4,182 clinical trials. The majority of drugs targeted neoplasms (26.20%), neurological diseases/diseases of the sense organs (13.48%), infectious and parasitic diseases (10.5%), and endocrine, metabolic, nutrition, and immunity disorders (9.45%). Less than 6% of drugs targeted diseases of the circulatory system, which represent the most prevalent causes of global mortality. Detailing the pharmaceutical pipeline, our findings suggest that pharmaceutical development does not adequately address global disease burden. Future research on the under-reported details of Phase I and II clinical trials is needed to understand how the industry operates and how its resource-allocation matches global health concerns.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical trials; phase I; phase II

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24816032      PMCID: PMC4134709          DOI: 10.1111/cts.12163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transl Sci        ISSN: 1752-8054            Impact factor:   4.689


  8 in total

Review 1.  Drug development for neglected diseases: a deficient market and a public-health policy failure.

Authors:  Patrice Trouiller; Piero Olliaro; Els Torreele; James Orbinski; Richard Laing; Nathan Ford
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-06-22       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  The medicine cabinet: what's in it, why, and can we change the contents?

Authors:  Thomas W Croghan; Patricia M Pittman
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Clinical trial website struggles to serve as research data hub.

Authors:  Monica Heger
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 53.440

4.  How many "me-too" drugs is too many?

Authors:  Joshua J Gagne; Niteesh K Choudhry
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Trends in risks associated with new drug development: success rates for investigational drugs.

Authors:  J A DiMasi; L Feldman; A Seckler; A Wilson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 6.  Relation between burden of disease and randomised evidence in sub-Saharan Africa: survey of research.

Authors:  Petros Isaakidis; George H Swingler; Elizabeth Pienaar; Jimmy Volmink; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-23

7.  Financing of U.S. biomedical research and new drug approvals across therapeutic areas.

Authors:  E Ray Dorsey; Joel P Thompson; Melisa Carrasco; Jason de Roulet; Philip Vitticore; Sean Nicholson; S Claiborne Johnston; Robert G Holloway; Hamilton Moses
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Relation between the global burden of disease and randomized clinical trials conducted in Latin America published in the five leading medical journals.

Authors:  Pablo Perel; J Jaime Miranda; Zulma Ortiz; Juan Pablo Casas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Five insights from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 202.731

2.  Automatic classification of registered clinical trials towards the Global Burden of Diseases taxonomy of diseases and injuries.

Authors:  Ignacio Atal; Jean-David Zeitoun; Aurélie Névéol; Philippe Ravaud; Raphaël Porcher; Ludovic Trinquart
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Likelihood of Null Effects of Large NHLBI Clinical Trials Has Increased over Time.

Authors:  Robert M Kaplan; Veronica L Irvin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 202.731

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.