Literature DB >> 26475480

Pharma Success in Product Development—Does Biotechnology Change the Paradigm in Product Development and Attrition.

Ronald P Evens.   

Abstract

The biotechnology segment of the overall biopharma industry has existed for only about 40–45 years, as a driver of new product development. This driving force was initiated with the FDA approval of recombinant human insulin in 1982, originating from the Genentech company. The pharma industry in the early years of 1970s and 1980s engaged with biotechnology companies only to a small extent with their in-licensing of a few recombinant molecules, led by Roche, Eli Lilly, and Johnson and Johnson. However, subsequently and dramatically over the last 25 years, biotechnology has become a primary driver of product and technology innovation and has become a cornerstone in new product development by all biopharma companies. This review demonstrates these evolutionary changes regarding approved products, product pipelines, novelty of the products, FDA approval rates, product sales, financial R&D investments in biotechnology, partnerships, mergers and acquisitions, and patent issues. We now have about 300 biotechnology products approved in USA covering 16 medical disciplines and about 250 indications, with the engagement of 25 pharma companies, along with their biotechnology company innovators and partners. The biotechnology pipeline involves over 1000 molecules in clinical trials, including over 300 molecules associated with the top 10 pharma companies. Product approval rates by the FDA for biotechnology products are over double the rate for drugs. Yes, the R&D paradigm has changed with biotechnology now as one of the major focuses for new product development with novel molecules by the whole biopharma industry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26475480      PMCID: PMC4706289          DOI: 10.1208/s12248-015-9833-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS J        ISSN: 1550-7416            Impact factor:   4.009


  6 in total

Review 1.  Trends in risks associated with new drug development: success rates for investigational drugs.

Authors:  J A DiMasi; L Feldman; A Seckler; A Wilson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  Regulatory watch: Innovation in biologic new molecular entities: 1986-2014.

Authors:  Kathleen L Miller; Michael Lanthier
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 84.694

3.  The evolution of biotechnology and its impact on health care.

Authors:  Ronald Evens; Kenneth Kaitin
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  The biotechnology innovation machine: a source of intelligent biopharmaceuticals for the pharma industry--mapping biotechnology's success.

Authors:  R P Evens; K I Kaitin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 6.875

5.  Clinical development success rates for investigational drugs.

Authors:  Michael Hay; David W Thomas; John L Craighead; Celia Economides; Jesse Rosenthal
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 6.  Combination cancer immunotherapy and new immunomodulatory targets.

Authors:  Kathleen M Mahoney; Paul D Rennert; Gordon J Freeman
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 84.694

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Rational optimization of a monoclonal antibody improves the aggregation propensity and enhances the CMC properties along the entire pharmaceutical process chain.

Authors:  Joschka Bauer; Sven Mathias; Sebastian Kube; Kerstin Otte; Patrick Garidel; Martin Gamer; Michaela Blech; Simon Fischer; Anne R Karow-Zwick
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 5.857

2.  A computational model for GPCR-ligand interaction prediction.

Authors:  Shiva Karimi; Maryam Ahmadi; Farjam Goudarzi; Reza Ferdousi
Journal:  J Integr Bioinform       Date:  2020-12-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.