Literature DB >> 20129597

The impact of Relative Prevalence on dual-target search for threat items from airport X-ray screening.

Hayward J Godwin1, Tamaryn Menneer, Kyle R Cave, Shaun Helman, Rachael L Way, Nick Donnelly.   

Abstract

The probability of target presentation in visual search tasks influences target detection performance: this is known as the prevalence effect (Wolfe et al., 2005). Additionally, searching for several targets simultaneously reduces search performance: this is known as the dual-target cost (DTC: Menneer et al., 2007). The interaction between the DTC and prevalence effect was investigated in a single study by presenting one target in dual-target search at a higher level of prevalence than the other target (Target A: 45% Prevalence; Target B: 5% Prevalence). An overall DTC was found for both RTs and response accuracy. Furthermore, there was an effect of target prevalence in dual-target search, suggesting that, when one target is presented at a higher level of prevalence than the other, both the dual-target cost and the prevalence effect contribute to decrements in performance. The implications for airport X-ray screening are discussed. Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20129597     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.12.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  15 in total

1.  When do I quit? The search termination problem in visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Nebr Symp Motiv       Date:  2012

2.  The effects of increasing target prevalence on information processing during visual search.

Authors:  Hayward J Godwin; Tamaryn Menneer; Kyle R Cave; Michael Thaibsyah; Nick Donnelly
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-04

3.  Failures of perception in the low-prevalence effect: Evidence from active and passive visual search.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Stephen C Walenchok; Stephen D Goldinger; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 4.  Using multidimensional scaling to quantify similarity in visual search and beyond.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Hayward J Godwin; Gemma Fitzsimmons; Arryn Robbins; Tamaryn Menneer; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 5.  Avoiding potential pitfalls in visual search and eye-movement experiments: A tutorial review.

Authors:  Hayward J Godwin; Michael C Hout; Katrín J Alexdóttir; Stephen C Walenchok; Anthony S Barnhart
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Influence of being videotaped on the prevalence effect during visual search.

Authors:  Yuki Miyazaki
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-06

7.  Attentional control via parallel target-templates in dual-target search.

Authors:  Doug J K Barrett; Oliver Zobay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Appraising the role of visual threat in speeded detection and classification tasks.

Authors:  Yue Yue; Philip T Quinlan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-16

9.  Comparing Breast Screening Protocols: Inserting Catch Trials Does Not Improve Sensitivity over Double Screening.

Authors:  Weijia Chen; Piers D L Howe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Understanding the contribution of target repetition and target expectation to the emergence of the prevalence effect in visual search.

Authors:  Hayward J Godwin; Tamaryn Menneer; Charlotte A Riggs; Dominic Taunton; Kyle R Cave; Nick Donnel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.