Literature DB >> 20127909

Two different sides of 'chemobrain': determinants and nondeterminants of self-perceived cognitive dysfunction in a prospective, randomized, multicenter study.

Kerstin Hermelink1, Helmut Küchenhoff, Michael Untch, Ingo Bauerfeind, Michael Patrick Lux, Markus Bühner, Juliane Manitz, Veronika Fensterer, Karin Münzel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Complaints of cognitive dysfunction are frequent among cancer patients. Many studies have identified neuropsychological compromise associated with cancer and cancer therapy; however, the neuropsychological compromise was not related to self-reported cognitive dysfunction. In this prospective study, the authors examined if confounding factors masked an underlying association of self-perceived cognitive function with actual cognitive performance. Determinants of self-perceived cognitive dysfunction were investigated.
METHODS: Self-perceived cognitive function and cognitive performance were assessed before treatment, at the end of treatment, and 1 year after baseline in 101 breast cancer patients randomized to standard versus intensified chemotherapy. Linear mixed-effects models were applied to test the relationships of performance on neuropsychological tests, patient characteristics, and treatment variables to self-reported cognitive function. Change of cognitive performance was tested as a predictor of change in self-reports.
RESULTS: Self-perceived cognitive function deteriorated during chemotherapy and had partially recovered 1 year after diagnosis. The personality trait negative affectivity, current depression, and chemotherapy regimen were consistently related to cognitive self-reports. No significant associations with performance in any of the 12 cognitive tests emerged. Change of cognitive performance was not reflected in self-reports of cognitive function.
CONCLUSIONS: Neuropsychological compromise and self-perceived cognitive dysfunction are independent phenomena in cancer patients. Generally, cancer-associated neuropsychological compromise is not noticed by affected patients, but negative affectivity and treatment burden induce pessimistic self-appraisals of cognitive functioning regardless of the presence of neuropsychological compromise. Clinicians should consider this when determining adequate therapy for patients who complain of 'chemobrain'.
Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20127909     DOI: 10.1002/pon.1695

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  34 in total

Review 1.  Psychosocial care in cancer.

Authors:  Samantha B Artherholt; Jesse R Fann
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.285

2.  Is chemotherapy associated with cognitive impairment?

Authors:  Robert Zachariae; Mimi Yung Mehlsen
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Chemobrain: a critical review and causal hypothesis of link between cytokines and epigenetic reprogramming associated with chemotherapy.

Authors:  Xiao-Min Wang; Brian Walitt; Leorey Saligan; Agnes F Y Tiwari; Chi Wai Cheung; Zhang-Jin Zhang
Journal:  Cytokine       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 3.861

4.  Pupillary response: cognitive effort for breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Jamie S Myers; Melike Kahya; Melissa Mitchell; Junqiang Dai; Jianghua He; Sanghee Moon; Kevin Hamilton; Mary Valla; Anne O'Dea; Jennifer Klemp; Monica Kurylo; Abiodun Akinwuntan; Hannes Devos
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Pilot Feasibility Study Examining Pupillary Response During Driving Simulation as a Measure of Cognitive Load in Breast Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Jamie S Myers; Nesreen Alissa; Melissa Mitchell; Junqiang Dai; Jianghua He; Sanghee Moon; Anne O'Dea; Jennifer Klemp; Monica Kurylo; Abiodun Akinwuntan; Hannes Devos
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 6.  Cognitive Impairment Associated with Cancer: A Brief Review.

Authors:  J Cara Pendergrass; Steven D Targum; John E Harrison
Journal:  Innov Clin Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-01

7.  Long-Term Cognitive Functioning in Testicular Germ-Cell Tumor Survivors.

Authors:  Michal Chovanec; Lucia Vasilkova; Lucia Setteyova; Jana Obertova; Patrik Palacka; Katarina Rejlekova; Zuzana Sycova-Mila; Katarina Kalavska; Daniela Svetlovska; Silvia Cingelova; Beata Mladosievicova; Jozef Mardiak; Michal Mego
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-01-19

8.  Systematic review of self-reported cognitive function in cancer patients following chemotherapy treatment.

Authors:  Victoria J Bray; Haryana M Dhillon; Janette L Vardy
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 9.  Cognitive impairment in gynecologic cancers: a systematic review of current approaches to diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Christine D Craig; Bradley J Monk; John H Farley; Dana M Chase
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-11-10       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  The utility of parent report in the assessment of working memory among childhood brain tumor survivors.

Authors:  Robyn A Howarth; Jason M Ashford; Thomas E Merchant; Robert J Ogg; Victor Santana; Shengjie Wu; Xiaoping Xiong; Heather M Conklin
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 2.892

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.