Literature DB >> 23432827

Developmental trends in auditory processing can provide early predictions of language acquisition in young infants.

Weerasak Chonchaiya1,2, Twila Tardif1,3, Xiaoqin Mai1,4, Lin Xu5, Mingyan Li5, Niko Kaciroti1, Paul R Kileny1,6, Jie Shao5, Betsy Lozoff1,7.   

Abstract

Auditory processing capabilities at the subcortical level have been hypothesized to impact an individual's development of both language and reading abilities. The present study examined whether auditory processing capabilities relate to language development in healthy 9-month-old infants. Participants were 71 infants (31 boys and 40 girls) with both Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) and language assessments. At 6 weeks and/or 9 months of age, the infants underwent ABR testing using both a standard hearing screening protocol with 30 dB clicks and a second protocol using click pairs separated by 8, 16, and 64-ms intervals presented at 80 dB. We evaluated the effects of interval duration on ABR latency and amplitude elicited by the second click. At 9 months, language development was assessed via parent report on the Chinese Communicative Development Inventory - Putonghua version (CCDI-P). Wave V latency z-scores of the 64-ms condition at 6 weeks showed strong direct relationships with Wave V latency in the same condition at 9 months. More importantly, shorter Wave V latencies at 9 months showed strong relationships with the CCDI-P composite consisting of phrases understood, gestures, and words produced. Likewise, infants who had greater decreases in Wave V latencies from 6 weeks to 9 months had higher CCDI-P composite scores. Females had higher language development scores and shorter Wave V latencies at both ages than males. Interestingly, when the ABR Wave V latencies at both ages were taken into account, the direct effects of gender on language disappeared. In conclusion, these results support the importance of low-level auditory processing capabilities for early language acquisition in a population of typically developing young infants. Moreover, the auditory brainstem response in this paradigm shows promise as an electrophysiological marker to predict individual differences in language development in young children.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23432827      PMCID: PMC3582039          DOI: 10.1111/desc.12012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Sci        ISSN: 1363-755X


  47 in total

1.  Development of auditory event-related potentials in young children and relations to word-level reading abilities at age 8 years.

Authors:  Kimberly Andrews Espy; Dennis L Molfese; Victoria J Molfese; Arlene Modglin
Journal:  Ann Dyslexia       Date:  2004-06

2.  Sensory processing of backward-masking signals in children with language-learning impairment as assessed with the auditory brainstem response.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Marler; Craig A Champlin
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 3.  The human auditory system: a timeline of development.

Authors:  Jean K Moore; Fred H Linthicum
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 4.  Neural coding strategies in auditory cortex.

Authors:  Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Brain potentials to native and non-native speech contrasts in 7- and 11-month-old American infants.

Authors:  Maritza Rivera-Gaxiola; Juan Silva-Pereyra; Patricia K Kuhl
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2005-03

6.  Brainstem timing: implications for cortical processing and literacy.

Authors:  Karen Banai; Trent Nicol; Steven G Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  ABR hearing screening for high-risk infants.

Authors:  L A Van Riper; P R Kileny
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1999-07

8.  Prevalence of specific language impairment in kindergarten children.

Authors:  J B Tomblin; N L Records; P Buckwalter; X Zhang; E Smith; M O'Brien
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Infant information processing and family history of specific language impairment: converging evidence for RAP deficits from two paradigms.

Authors:  Naseem Choudhury; Paavo H T Leppanen; Hilary J Leevers; April A Benasich
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2007-03

10.  Phonetic learning as a pathway to language: new data and native language magnet theory expanded (NLM-e).

Authors:  Patricia K Kuhl; Barbara T Conboy; Sharon Coffey-Corina; Denise Padden; Maritza Rivera-Gaxiola; Tobey Nelson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

View more
  10 in total

1.  Prenatal organophosphate insecticide exposure and infant sensory function.

Authors:  Monica K Silver; Jie Shao; Chai Ji; Binquan Zhu; Lin Xu; Mingyan Li; Minjian Chen; Yankai Xia; Niko Kaciroti; Betsy Lozoff; John D Meeker
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 5.840

2.  Prenatal exposure to multiple pesticides is associated with auditory brainstem response at 9months in a cohort study of Chinese infants.

Authors:  Julie Sturza; Monica K Silver; Lin Xu; Mingyan Li; Xiaoqin Mai; Yankai Xia; Jie Shao; Betsy Lozoff; John Meeker
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2016-05-08       Impact factor: 9.621

3.  Click-evoked auditory brainstem responses and autism spectrum disorder: A meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Nicole M Talge; Brooke M Tudor; Paul R Kileny
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 5.216

4.  Prenatal exposure to the herbicide 2,4-D is associated with deficits in auditory processing during infancy.

Authors:  Monica K Silver; Jie Shao; Mingyan Li; Chai Ji; Minjian Chen; Yankai Xia; Betsy Lozoff; John D Meeker
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 6.498

5.  Auditory Processing Differences in Toddlers With Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Maranda K Jones; Nina Kraus; Silvia Bonacina; Trent Nicol; Sebastian Otto-Meyer; Megan Y Roberts
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Plasma metabolic profile delineates roles for neurodegeneration, pro-inflammatory damage and mitochondrial dysfunction in the FMR1 premutation.

Authors:  Cecilia Giulivi; Eleonora Napoli; Flora Tassone; Julian Halmai; Randi Hagerman
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.857

7.  Temporal processing in the auditory brainstem response by full-term 6-week- and 9-month-old infants.

Authors:  Xiaoqin Mai; Twila Tardif; Lin Xu; Mingyan Li; Paul R Kileny; Jie Shao; Betsy Lozoff
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Low-level prenatal lead exposure and infant sensory function.

Authors:  Monica K Silver; Xiaoqing Li; Yuhe Liu; Ming Li; Xiaoqin Mai; Niko Kaciroti; Paul Kileny; Twila Tardif; John D Meeker; Betsy Lozoff
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 5.984

9.  Plasma Biomarkers for Monitoring Brain Pathophysiology in FMR1 Premutation Carriers.

Authors:  Cecilia Giulivi; Eleonora Napoli; Flora Tassone; Julian Halmai; Randi Hagerman
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 5.639

10.  Premutation in the Fragile X Mental Retardation 1 (FMR1) Gene Affects Maternal Zn-milk and Perinatal Brain Bioenergetics and Scaffolding.

Authors:  Eleonora Napoli; Catherine Ross-Inta; Gyu Song; Sarah Wong; Randi Hagerman; Louise W Gane; Jennifer T Smilowitz; Flora Tassone; Cecilia Giulivi
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 5.152

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.