OBJECTIVE: Establish the time required to perform cochlear implantation (CI) in academic settings. STUDY DESIGN: Historical cohort study. SETTING: German and American academic centers. PATIENTS: A total of 2639 patients underwent CI (1997-2007). We excluded patients receiving an experimental device or technique and those with abnormal cochlear anatomy or incomplete charts, leaving 2253 for analysis. INTERVENTION: Unilateral, bilateral, and revision CI with devices approved in the U.S. and Europe. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean surgical time (ST) and total operating room time (TORT). RESULTS: Mixed model analysis was used; estimated marginal means were calculated in minutes after adjusting for random effect of individual surgeon. There were no differences between unilateral (ST = 171, TORT = 245) and revision CI (ST = 160, TORT = 232), but bilateral procedures were longer (ST = 295, TORT = 377, P < 0.001). In unilateral surgeries, Cochlear Limited (CL) devices were implanted faster (ST = 165, TORT = 225) than Advanced Bionics (ABC) (ST = 183, P = 0.001; TORT = 240, P = 0.023) or MedEl (ST = 193, P < 0.001; TORT = 253, P = 0.002) devices. There were no differences for unilateral CI between ABC and MedEl devices. For revision CI, ABC devices (ST = 141, TORT = 219) were implanted faster than CL devices (ST = 181, P = 0.001; TORT = 266, P < 0.001). There were no differences by age group or between Germany and the U.S. ST and TORT were shorter for 575 CIs performed in the final two years of the study (unilateral CI: ST = 145, TORT = 209; bilateral CI: ST = 259, TORT = 330; revision CI: ST = 138, TORT = 205). For unilateral CI, ST and TORT decreased yearly (linear regression, P < 0.001) and inversely correlated with surgeon experience (linear regression, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We report the time required to perform CI in academic settings-data that are vital for cost-benefit analyses and assessing new CI techniques. Copyright 2010 American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVE: Establish the time required to perform cochlear implantation (CI) in academic settings. STUDY DESIGN: Historical cohort study. SETTING: German and American academic centers. PATIENTS: A total of 2639 patients underwent CI (1997-2007). We excluded patients receiving an experimental device or technique and those with abnormal cochlear anatomy or incomplete charts, leaving 2253 for analysis. INTERVENTION: Unilateral, bilateral, and revision CI with devices approved in the U.S. and Europe. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean surgical time (ST) and total operating room time (TORT). RESULTS: Mixed model analysis was used; estimated marginal means were calculated in minutes after adjusting for random effect of individual surgeon. There were no differences between unilateral (ST = 171, TORT = 245) and revision CI (ST = 160, TORT = 232), but bilateral procedures were longer (ST = 295, TORT = 377, P < 0.001). In unilateral surgeries, Cochlear Limited (CL) devices were implanted faster (ST = 165, TORT = 225) than Advanced Bionics (ABC) (ST = 183, P = 0.001; TORT = 240, P = 0.023) or MedEl (ST = 193, P < 0.001; TORT = 253, P = 0.002) devices. There were no differences for unilateral CI between ABC and MedEl devices. For revision CI, ABC devices (ST = 141, TORT = 219) were implanted faster than CL devices (ST = 181, P = 0.001; TORT = 266, P < 0.001). There were no differences by age group or between Germany and the U.S. ST and TORT were shorter for 575 CIs performed in the final two years of the study (unilateral CI: ST = 145, TORT = 209; bilateral CI: ST = 259, TORT = 330; revision CI: ST = 138, TORT = 205). For unilateral CI, ST and TORT decreased yearly (linear regression, P < 0.001) and inversely correlated with surgeon experience (linear regression, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We report the time required to perform CI in academic settings-data that are vital for cost-benefit analyses and assessing new CI techniques. Copyright 2010 American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Elias D Stratigouleas; Brian P Perry; Susan Marenda King; Charles A Syms Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Ramya Balachandran; Jason E Mitchell; Grégoire Blachon; Jack H Noble; Benoit M Dawant; J Michael Fitzpatrick; Robert F Labadie Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Sidharth V Puram; Elliott D Kozin; Rosh Kv Sethi; Ariel E Hight; Mark G Shrime; Stacey T Gray; Michael S Cohen; Daniel J Lee Journal: Cochlear Implants Int Date: 2014-11-11
Authors: Louis B Kratchman; Grégoire S Blachon; Thomas J Withrow; Ramya Balachandran; Robert F Labadie; Robert J Webster Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2011-07-22 Impact factor: 4.538