Literature DB >> 17245073

The learning curve in stapes surgery and its implication for training.

M W Yung1, J Oates.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify the 'stapedotomy' learning curve of 2 UK otolaryngologists. STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective review of the outcome of the first 100 stapedotomy operations by each surgeon. Included in the study was a postal survey of the incidence of stapes surgery by UK otolaryngologists.
SETTING: Two tertiary referral centres. PATIENTS: All ears in which primary stapedotomy was performed for otosclerosis. Non-otosclerotic cases and malleus stapedotomy cases were excluded. INTERVENTION: One surgeon used the technique of small fenestra stapedotomy with either a Teflon wire or titanium piston, but without vein graft interposition, whilst the second employed the technique of stapedotomy with vein graft interposition, and a Teflon piston. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The first 100 stapes operations performed by each surgeon were subdivided into consecutive groups of 10. Using a postoperative air-bone gap of 20 dB or better as a definition of 'success', the 'success rates' of each group were plotted on graphs - the learning curves. The end point of the learning curve was defined as the point 'where the curve reaches its plateau'.
RESULTS: The learning curves of both surgeons included 70-80 operations. Both surgeons had one 'dead ear' in their first 15 cases. The postal survey showed that some trainers only perform a small number of stapes surgeries, whereas some otolaryngologists who regularly perform stapedotomies were not trainers.
CONCLUSIONS: This is a mismatch of trainers and trainees in stapes surgery. If the current trend of decline in stapes surgery continues, it will take many years for some otolaryngologists to complete their learning curves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17245073     DOI: 10.1159/000098861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0065-3071


  5 in total

1.  Learning curve estimation in medical devices and procedures: hierarchical modeling.

Authors:  Usha S Govindarajulu; Marco Stillo; David Goldfarb; Michael E Matheny; Frederic S Resnic
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Time of cochlear implant surgery in academic settings.

Authors:  Omid Majdani; Theodore A Schuman; David S Haynes; Mary S Dietrich; Martin Leinung; Thomas Lenarz; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.497

3.  Long-term hearing results of stapedotomy: analysis of factors affecting outcome.

Authors:  Ingeborg Dhooge; Stéphanie Desmedt; Thomas Maly; David Loose; Helen Van Hoecke
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Stapes surgery in Sweden: evaluation of a national-based register.

Authors:  Karin Strömbäck; Lars Lundman; Andreas Bjorsne; Joakim Grendin; Anna Stjernquist-Desatnik; Ylva Dahlin-Redfors
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-03-11       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Preferences in stapes surgery among American otological society otologists.

Authors:  Yuan F Liu; Avigeet Gupta; Shaun A Nguyen; Paul R Lambert; Timothy T Jung
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-02-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.