| Literature DB >> 20110894 |
Lenka Tůmová1, Jirí Tůma, Klara Megusar, Martin Dolezal.
Abstract
Substituted pyrazinecarboxamides markedly influenced production of flavonolignans in Silybum marianum callus and suspension cultures. In this study the effect of two compounds, N-(3-iodo-4-methylphenyl)pyrazine-2-carboxamide (1) and N-(3-iodo-4-methylphenyl)-5-tert-butyl-pyrazine-2-carboxamide (2), as abiotic elicitors on flavono-lignan production in callus culture of S. marianum was investigated. Silymarin complex compounds have hepatoprotective, anticancer and also hypocholesterolemic activity. In vitro flavonolignan concentration in cells is very low and the elicitation is one of the methods to increase production. Elicitors were tested at three concentrations and at different culture times. In the case of elicitation with 1, the greatest increase of flavonolignan and taxifoline production was observed at concentration c(1a) after 6-hours of elicitation and after 24 and 72-hours at concentration c(1b). However, increased production of silychristin, one of the compounds in the silymarin complex, was achieved after only 6-hours elicitation with c(1a) (2.95 x 10(-4) mol/L). The content of silychristin was 2-times higher compared to the control sample. An increased production of silychristin was reached with compound 2 at the concentration c(2) (2.53 x 10(-3) mol/L) after 72 h of elicitation. The production of silychristin in this case was increased 12-times compared to control.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20110894 PMCID: PMC6256978 DOI: 10.3390/molecules15010331
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Structures of compounds 1 and 2.
Flavonolignans and taxifolin content (%) in callus culture S. marianum after elicitation with compound 1.
| Elicitor concentration (mg/100 mL) | Exposure time (hours) | Content of flavonolignans and taxifolin (%) | SD | Statistic value - |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 0.006 | 0.005 | 0.00 | |
|
| 12 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 1.63 |
| 24 | 0.006 | 0.005 | 0.00 | |
|
|
| 0.005 | - | |
| 48 | 0.003 | 0.005 | 0.577 | |
| 72 | 0.012 | 0.005 | 1.16 | |
| 168 | 0.012 | 0.005 | 1.16 | |
|
|
| 0.005 | - | |
| 6 | 0.080 | 0.005 | 12.7 | |
|
| 12 | 0.009 | 0.009 | 0.408 |
| 24 | 0,012 | 0.005 | 0,00 | |
|
|
| 0.005 | - | |
| 48 | 0.015 | 0.005 | 0.577 | |
| 72 | 0.012 | 0.005 | 0.00 | |
| 168 | 0.012 | 0.005 | 0.00 | |
|
|
| 0.005 | - | |
| 6 | 0.006 | 0.005 | 0.00 | |
|
| 12 | 0.003 | 0.005 | 0.577 |
| 24 | 0.080 | 0.005 | 13.9 | |
|
|
| 0.005 | - | |
| 48 | 0.012 | 0.005 | 1.16 | |
| 72 | 0.058 | 0.005 | 9.82 | |
| 168 | 0.012 | 0.005 | 231 | |
|
|
| 0.005 | - |
K-control (without elicitor treatment).
Figure 2Dependence of the content of flavonolignans and taxifolin in callus culture Silybum marianum related to the elicitor exposure times compared between treatments with three different concentrations of compound 1 and between controls.
Flavonolignans and taxifolin content (%) in callus culture S. marianum L. after elicitation with compound 2.
| Elicitor concentration (mg/100 mL) | Exposure time (hours) | Content of flavonolignans and taxifolin (%) | SD | Statistical value - |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 0.003 | 0.005 | 1.63 | |
|
| 12 | 0.000 | 0.000 | - |
| 24 | 0.006 | 0.005 | 0.816 | |
|
|
| 0.000 | - | |
| 48 | 0.003 | 0.005 | 1.63 | |
| 72 | 0.107 | 0.005 | 26.1 | |
| 168 | 0.015 | 0.005 | 0.408 | |
|
|
| 0.009 | - | |
| 6 | 0.080 | 0.005 | 13.9 | |
|
| 12 | 0.003 | 0.005 | 0.577 |
| 24 | 0.012 | 0.005 | 1.16 | |
|
|
| 0.005 | - | |
| 48 | 0.006 | 0.005 | 0.00 | |
| 72 | 0.009 | 0.009 | 0.408 | |
| 168 | 0.003 | 0.005 | 0.577 | |
|
|
| 0.005 | - | |
| 6 | 0.021 | 0.005 | 2.89 | |
|
| 12 | 0.003 | 0.005 | 0.577 |
| 24 | 0,000 | 0.000 | 1.63 | |
|
|
| 0.005 | - | |
| 48 | 0.003 | 0.005 | 0.577 | |
| 72 | 0.003 | 0.005 | 0.577 | |
| 168 | 0.003 | 0.005 | 0.577 | |
|
|
| 0.005 | - |
K-control (without elicitor treatment).
Figure 3Dependence of the of flavonolignans and taxifolin content in callus culture Silybum marianum related to the elicitor exposure compared between treatments with three different concentrations of compound 2 and between controls. All experimental analyses were carried out in a minimum of three independent samples for each elicitation period and each concentration of elicitor.