Literature DB >> 20096585

Mad2 prolongs DNA damage checkpoint arrest caused by a double-strand break via a centromere-dependent mechanism.

Farokh Dotiwala1, Jacob C Harrison, Suvi Jain, Neal Sugawara, James E Haber.   

Abstract

Eukaryotic cells employ a suite of replication and mitotic checkpoints to ensure the accurate transmission of their DNA. In budding yeast, both the DNA damage checkpoint and the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) block cells prior to anaphase. The presence of a single unrepaired double-strand break (DSB) activates ATR and ATM protein kinase homologs Mec1 and Tel1, which then activate downstream effectors to trigger G2/M arrest and also phosphorylate histone H2A (creating gamma-H2AX) in chromatin surrounding the DSB. The SAC monitors proper attachment of spindle microtubules to the kinetochore formed at each centromere and the biorientation of sister centromeres toward opposite spindle pole bodies. Although these two checkpoints sense quite different perturbations, recent evidence has demonstrated both synergistic interactions and cross-talk between them. Here we report that Mad2 and other SAC proteins play an unexpected role in prolonging G2/M arrest after induction of a single DSB. This function of the SAC depends not only on Mec1 and other components of the DNA damage checkpoint but also on the presence of the centromere located > or = 90 kb from the DNA damage. DNA damage induces epigenetic changes at the centromere, including the gamma-H2AX modification, that appear to alter kinetochore function, thus triggering the canonical SAC. Thus, a single DSB triggers a response by both checkpoints to prevent the segregation of a damaged chromosome. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20096585      PMCID: PMC2811853          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.12.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  26 in total

Review 1.  The spindle assembly and spindle position checkpoints.

Authors:  Daniel J Lew; Daniel J Burke
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 16.830

2.  CDC5 and CKII control adaptation to the yeast DNA damage checkpoint.

Authors:  D P Toczyski; D J Galgoczy; L H Hartwell
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1997-09-19       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  Cell cycle checkpoints: preventing an identity crisis.

Authors:  S J Elledge
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-12-06       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  DNA length dependence of the single-strand annealing pathway and the role of Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD59 in double-strand break repair.

Authors:  N Sugawara; G Ira; J E Haber
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Saccharomyces Ku70, mre11/rad50 and RPA proteins regulate adaptation to G2/M arrest after DNA damage.

Authors:  S E Lee; J K Moore; A Holmes; K Umezu; R D Kolodner; J E Haber
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1998-08-07       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Distribution and dynamics of chromatin modification induced by a defined DNA double-strand break.

Authors:  Robert Shroff; Ayelet Arbel-Eden; Duane Pilch; Grzegorz Ira; William M Bonner; John H Petrini; James E Haber; Michael Lichten
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-10-05       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Overlapping roles of the spindle assembly and DNA damage checkpoints in the cell-cycle response to altered chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Peter M Garber; Jasper Rine
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Recovery from checkpoint-mediated arrest after repair of a double-strand break requires Srs2 helicase.

Authors:  Moreshwar B Vaze; Achille Pellicioli; Sang Eun Lee; Grzegorz Ira; Giordano Liberi; Ayelet Arbel-Eden; Marco Foiani; James E Haber
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 17.970

9.  Recruitment of functionally distinct membrane proteins to chromatin mediates nuclear envelope formation in vivo.

Authors:  Daniel J Anderson; Jesse D Vargas; Joshua P Hsiao; Martin W Hetzer
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDK1.

Authors:  Grzegorz Ira; Achille Pellicioli; Alitukiriza Balijja; Xuan Wang; Simona Fiorani; Walter Carotenuto; Giordano Liberi; Debra Bressan; Lihong Wan; Nancy M Hollingsworth; James E Haber; Marco Foiani
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-10-21       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  55 in total

Review 1.  Mitosis in vertebrates: the G2/M and M/A transitions and their associated checkpoints.

Authors:  Conly L Rieder
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Chromosome position determines the success of double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Cheng-Sheng Lee; Ruoxi W Wang; Hsiao-Han Chang; Daniel Capurso; Mark R Segal; James E Haber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  DNA damage signalling targets the kinetochore to promote chromatin mobility.

Authors:  Jonathan Strecker; Gagan D Gupta; Wei Zhang; Mikhail Bashkurov; Marie-Claude Landry; Laurence Pelletier; Daniel Durocher
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 28.824

4.  A genetic screen for high copy number suppressors of the synthetic lethality between elg1Δ and srs2Δ in yeast.

Authors:  Inbal Gazy; Batia Liefshitz; Alex Bronstein; Oren Parnas; Nir Atias; Roded Sharan; Martin Kupiec
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 3.154

5.  Merotelic attachments and non-homologous end joining are the basis of chromosomal instability.

Authors:  Astrid Alonso Guerrero; Carlos Martínez-A; Karel Hm van Wely
Journal:  Cell Div       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 5.130

6.  Inhibition of activated pericentromeric SINE/Alu repeat transcription in senescent human adult stem cells reinstates self-renewal.

Authors:  Jianrong Wang; Glenn J Geesman; Sirkka Liisa Hostikka; Michelle Atallah; Benjamin Blackwell; Elbert Lee; Peter J Cook; Bogdan Pasaniuc; Goli Shariat; Eran Halperin; Marek Dobke; Michael G Rosenfeld; I King Jordan; Victoria V Lunyak
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 4.534

7.  DNA damage to a single chromosome end delays anaphase onset.

Authors:  Bárbara Alcaraz Silva; Jessica R Stambaugh; Kyoko Yokomori; Jagesh V Shah; Michael W Berns
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  The spindle assembly checkpoint: More than just keeping track of the spindle.

Authors:  Katherine S Lawrence; JoAnne Engebrecht
Journal:  Trends Cell Mol Biol       Date:  2015

9.  Overcoming cisplatin resistance in non-small cell lung cancer with Mad2 silencing siRNA delivered systemically using EGFR-targeted chitosan nanoparticles.

Authors:  Ana Vanessa Nascimento; Amit Singh; Hassan Bousbaa; Domingos Ferreira; Bruno Sarmento; Mansoor M Amiji
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 8.947

10.  Reduced kinase activity of polo kinase Cdc5 affects chromosome stability and DNA damage response in S. cerevisiae.

Authors:  Chetan C Rawal; Sara Riccardo; Chiara Pesenti; Matteo Ferrari; Federica Marini; Achille Pellicioli
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 4.534

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.