Literature DB >> 12072451

Overlapping roles of the spindle assembly and DNA damage checkpoints in the cell-cycle response to altered chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Peter M Garber1, Jasper Rine.   

Abstract

The MAD2-dependent spindle checkpoint blocks anaphase until all chromosomes have achieved successful bipolar attachment to the mitotic spindle. The DNA damage and DNA replication checkpoints block anaphase in response to DNA lesions that may include single-stranded DNA and stalled replication forks. Many of the same conditions that activate the DNA damage and DNA replication checkpoints also activated the spindle checkpoint. The mad2Delta mutation partially relieved the arrest responses of cells to mutations affecting the replication proteins Mcm3p and Pol1p. Thus a previously unrecognized aspect of spindle checkpoint function may be to protect cells from defects in DNA replication. Furthermore, in cells lacking either the DNA damage or the DNA replication checkpoints, the spindle checkpoint contributed to the arrest responses of cells to the DNA-damaging agent methyl methanesulfonate, the replication inhibitor hydroxyurea, and mutations affecting Mcm2p and Orc2p. Thus the spindle checkpoint was sensitive to a wider range of chromosomal perturbations than previously recognized. Finally, the DNA replication checkpoint did not contribute to the arrests of cells in response to mutations affecting ORC, Mcm proteins, or DNA polymerase delta. Thus the specificity of this checkpoint may be more limited than previously recognized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12072451      PMCID: PMC1462146     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  32 in total

Review 1.  Sensing and responding to DNA damage.

Authors:  N F Lowndes; J R Murguia
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.578

2.  Lesions in many different spindle components activate the spindle checkpoint in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  K G Hardwick; R Li; C Mistrot; R H Chen; P Dann; A Rudner; A W Murray
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  DNA damage checkpoints and DNA replication controls in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  M Foiani; A Pellicioli; M Lopes; C Lucca; M Ferrari; G Liberi; M Muzi Falconi; P Plevani1
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2000-06-30       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  Identification of RFC(Ctf18p, Ctf8p, Dcc1p): an alternative RFC complex required for sister chromatid cohesion in S. cerevisiae.

Authors:  M L Mayer; S P Gygi; R Aebersold; P Hieter
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae CTF18 and CTF4 are required for sister chromatid cohesion.

Authors:  J S Hanna; E S Kroll; V Lundblad; F A Spencer
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Ctf7p is essential for sister chromatid cohesion and links mitotic chromosome structure to the DNA replication machinery.

Authors:  R V Skibbens; L B Corson; D Koshland; P Hieter
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1999-02-01       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  Saccharomyces Ku70, mre11/rad50 and RPA proteins regulate adaptation to G2/M arrest after DNA damage.

Authors:  S E Lee; J K Moore; A Holmes; K Umezu; R D Kolodner; J E Haber
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1998-08-07       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Recovery from DNA replicational stress is the essential function of the S-phase checkpoint pathway.

Authors:  B A Desany; A A Alcasabas; J B Bachant; S J Elledge
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1998-09-15       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  Orc mutants arrest in metaphase with abnormally condensed chromosomes.

Authors:  M F Pflumm; M R Botchan
Journal:  Development       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 10.  A new view of the spindle checkpoint.

Authors:  M A Hoyt
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2001-09-03       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  39 in total

1.  Chromosome rearrangements and aneuploidy in yeast strains lacking both Tel1p and Mec1p reflect deficiencies in two different mechanisms.

Authors:  Jennifer L McCulley; Thomas D Petes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The kinetochore protein Bub1 participates in the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Chunying Yang; Haibo Wang; Yiran Xu; Kathryn L Brinkman; Hiromichi Ishiyama; Stephen T C Wong; Bo Xu
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2011-11-09

3.  Diverse functions of spindle assembly checkpoint genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Jewel A Daniel; Brice E Keyes; Yvonne P Y Ng; C Onyi Freeman; Daniel J Burke
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-09-12       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The F-box protein Dia2 overcomes replication impedance to promote genome stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Deborah Blake; Brian Luke; Pamela Kanellis; Paul Jorgensen; Theo Goh; Sonya Penfold; Bobby-Joe Breitkreutz; Daniel Durocher; Matthias Peter; Mike Tyers
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-06-04       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The spindle assembly checkpoint regulates the phosphorylation state of a subset of DNA checkpoint proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Céline Clémenson; Marie-Claude Marsolier-Kergoat
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-10-23       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  The S-phase checkpoint is required to respond to R-loops accumulated in THO mutants.

Authors:  Belén Gómez-González; Irene Felipe-Abrio; Andrés Aguilera
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Mutants defective in Rad1-Rad10-Slx4 exhibit a unique pattern of viability during mating-type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Amy M Lyndaker; Tamara Goldfarb; Eric Alani
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  The spindle assembly checkpoint: More than just keeping track of the spindle.

Authors:  Katherine S Lawrence; JoAnne Engebrecht
Journal:  Trends Cell Mol Biol       Date:  2015

9.  Regulation of mitosis in response to damaged or incompletely replicated DNA require different levels of Grapes (Drosophila Chk1).

Authors:  Amanda Purdy; Lyle Uyetake; Melissa Garner Cordeiro; Tin Tin Su
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 5.285

10.  Actin cytoskeleton is required for nuclear accumulation of Gln3 in response to nitrogen limitation but not rapamycin treatment in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Kathleen H Cox; Jennifer J Tate; Terrance G Cooper
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-02-16       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.