Literature DB >> 20096305

Robust movement segmentation by combining multiple sources of information.

Willemijn D Schot1, Eli Brenner, Jeroen B J Smeets.   

Abstract

One of the first steps in analyzing kinematic data is determining the beginning and end of movement segments. This is often done automatically on the basis of one parameter (such as a speed minimum) and subsequently corrections are made if visual inspection of other kinematic parameters suggests that the obtained value was incorrect. We argue that in many cases it is impossible to find a satisfactory endpoint for all possible movement segments within an experiment using a single parameter because the intuition about the end of a segment is based on multiple criteria. Therefore by taking the maximum of an objective function based on multiple sources of information one can find the best possible time point to call the endpoint. We will demonstrate that this Multiple Sources of Information method (MSI-method) for finding endpoints performs better than conventional methods and that it is robust against arbitrary choices made by the researcher. Using it reduces the chance of introducing biases and eliminates the need for subjective corrections. Although we will take goal directed upper limb motion as an example throughout this paper, it should be stressed that the method could be applied to a wide variety of movements. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20096305     DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  31 in total

1.  Grasping in absence of feedback: systematic biases endure extensive training.

Authors:  Chiara Bozzacchi; Robert Volcic; Fulvio Domini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Smooth at one end and rough at the other: influence of object texture on grasping behaviour.

Authors:  Catharina Glowania; L C J van Dam; E Brenner; M A Plaisier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The influence of target object shape on maximum grip aperture in human grasping movements.

Authors:  Rebekka Verheij; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The visibility of contact points influences grasping movements.

Authors:  Robert Volcic; Fulvio Domini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-05-18       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  On-line visual control of grasping movements.

Authors:  Robert Volcic; Fulvio Domini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Complexity of movement preparation and the spatiotemporal coupling of bimanual reach-to-grasp movements.

Authors:  Jarrod Blinch; Jon B Doan; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Grasping and hitting moving objects.

Authors:  Willemijn D Schot; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Similarities between digits' movements in grasping, touching and pushing.

Authors:  Jeroen B J Smeets; Juul Martin; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Nothing magical: pantomimed grasping is controlled by the ventral system.

Authors:  Thijs Rinsma; John van der Kamp; Matt Dicks; Rouwen Cañal-Bruland
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Posture of the arm when grasping spheres to place them elsewhere.

Authors:  Willemijn D Schot; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.