Literature DB >> 20567809

Posture of the arm when grasping spheres to place them elsewhere.

Willemijn D Schot1, Eli Brenner, Jeroen B J Smeets.   

Abstract

Despite the infinitely many ways to grasp a spherical object, regularities have been observed in the posture of the arm and the grasp orientation. In the present study, we set out to determine the factors that predict the grasp orientation and the final joint angles of reach-to-grasp movements. Subjects made reach-to-grasp movements toward a sphere to pick it up and place it at an indicated location. We varied the position of the sphere and the starting and placing positions. Multiple regression analysis showed that the sphere's azimuth from the subject was the best predictor of grasp orientation, although there were also smaller but reliable contributions of distance, starting position, and perhaps even placing position. The sphere's initial distance from the subject was the best predictor of the final elbow angle and shoulder elevation. A combination of the sphere's azimuth and distance from the subject was required to predict shoulder angle, trunk-head rotation, and lateral head position. The starting position best predicted the final wrist angle and sagittal head position. We conclude that the final posture of the arm when grasping a sphere to place it elsewhere is determined to a larger extend by the initial position of the object than by effects of starting and placing position.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20567809      PMCID: PMC2892064          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2261-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  19 in total

1.  Hand orientation for grasping depends on the direction of the reaching movement.

Authors:  A Roby-Brami; N Bennis; M Mokhtari; P Baraduc
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2000-06-30       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Three-dimensional kinematic analysis of influence of hand orientation and joint limits on the control of arm postures and movements.

Authors:  X Wang
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.086

3.  Finding final postures.

Authors:  J Vaughan; D A Rosenbaum; C J Harp; L D Loukopoulos; S Engelbrecht
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.328

4.  Multi-joint limbs permit a flexible response to unpredictable events.

Authors:  E M Robertson; R C Miall
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Influence of object position and size on human prehension movements.

Authors:  Y Paulignan; V G Frak; I Toni; M Jeannerod
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Arm position constraints during pointing and reaching in 3-D space.

Authors:  C C Gielen; E J Vrijenhoek; T Flash; S F Neggers
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Hand orientation for grasping and arm joint rotation patterns in healthy subjects and hemiparetic stroke patients.

Authors:  Agnès Roby-Brami; Stéphane Jacobs; Nezha Bennis; Mindy F Levin
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-18       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Task dependence of primate arm postures.

Authors:  S I Tillery; T J Ebner; J F Soechting
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  Planning reaches by evaluating stored postures.

Authors:  D A Rosenbaum; L D Loukopoulos; R G Meulenbroek; J Vaughan; S E Engelbrecht
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Moving effortlessly in three dimensions: does Donders' law apply to arm movement?

Authors:  J F Soechting; C A Buneo; U Herrmann; M Flanders
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  9 in total

1.  Contact points during multidigit grasping of geometric objects.

Authors:  René Gilster; Constanze Hesse; Heiner Deubel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Manual matching of perceived surface orientation is affected by arm posture: evidence of calibration between proprioception and visual experience in near space.

Authors:  Zhi Li; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The influence of obstacles on grasp planning.

Authors:  Isabelle T Garzorz; Alexander G Knorr; Rene Gilster; Heiner Deubel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Brief assessment of motor function: content validity and reliability of the upper extremity gross motor scale.

Authors:  Holly Lea Cintas; Rebecca Parks; Sarah Don; Lynn Gerber
Journal:  Phys Occup Ther Pediatr       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 2.360

5.  Grasp: combined contribution of object properties and task constraints on hand and finger posture.

Authors:  François Touvet; Agnès Roby-Brami; Marc A Maier; Selim Eskiizmirliler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Humans Can Visually Judge Grasp Quality and Refine Their Judgments Through Visual and Haptic Feedback.

Authors:  Guido Maiello; Marcel Schepko; Lina K Klein; Vivian C Paulun; Roland W Fleming
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Having several options does not increase the time it takes to make a movement to an adequate end point.

Authors:  Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 2.064

8.  A Donders' Like Law for Arm Movements: The Signal not the Noise.

Authors:  Steven Ewart; Stephanie M Hynes; Warren G Darling; Charles Capaday
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Fixation Biases towards the Index Finger in Almost-Natural Grasping.

Authors:  Dimitris Voudouris; Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.