Literature DB >> 9160938

A meta-analysis of the efficacy of non-operative treatments for idiopathic scoliosis.

D E Rowe1, S M Bernstein, M F Riddick, F Adler, J B Emans, D Gardner-Bonneau.   

Abstract

With use of data culled from twenty studies, members of the Prevalence and Natural History Committee of the Scoliosis Research Society conducted a meta-analysis of 1910 patients who had been managed with bracing (1459 patients), lateral electrical surface stimulation (322 patients), or observation (129 patients) because of idiopathic scoliosis. Three variables - the type of treatment, the level of maturity, and the criterion for failure - were analyzed to determine which had the greatest impact on the outcome. We also examined the effect of the type of brace that was used and the duration of bracing on the success of treatment. The number of failures of treatment in each study was determined by calculating the total number of patients who had unacceptable progression of the curve (as defined in the study), who could not comply with or tolerate treatment, or who had an operation. The percentage of patients who completed a given course of treatment without failure, adjusted for the sample sizes of the studies in which that treatment was used, yielded the weighted mean proportion of success for that treatment. The weighted mean proportion of success was 0.39 for lateral electrical surface stimulation, 0.49 for observation only, 0.60 for bracing for eight hours per day, 0.62 for bracing for sixteen hours per day, and 0.93 for bracing for twenty-three hours per day. The twenty-three-hour regimens were significantly more successful than any other treatment (p < 0.0001). The difference between the eight and sixteen-hour regimens was not significant, with the numbers available. Although lateral electrical surface stimulation was associated with a lower weighted mean proportion of success than observation only, the difference was not significant, with the numbers available. This meta-analysis demonstrates the effectiveness of bracing for the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. The weighted mean proportion of success for the six types of braces included in this review was 0.92, with the highest proportion (0.99) achieved with the Milwaukee brace. We found that use of the Milwaukee brace or another thoracolumbosacral orthosis for twenty-three hours per day effectively halted progression of the curve. Bracing for eight or sixteen hours per day was found to be significantly less effective than bracing for twenty-three hours per day (p < 0.0001).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9160938     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199705000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  85 in total

1.  Design of the Bracing in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Trial (BrAIST).

Authors:  Stuart L Weinstein; Lori A Dolan; James G Wright; Matthew B Dobbs
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Effectiveness of the Providence nighttime bracing in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparative study of 36 female patients.

Authors:  Timo Yrjönen; Mauno Ylikoski; Dietrich Schlenzka; Riitta Kinnunen; Mikko Poussa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-01-21       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Biomechanical modeling of brace treatment of scoliosis: effects of gravitational loads.

Authors:  Julien Clin; Carl-Éric Aubin; Stefan Parent; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Letter to the editor: evidence-based of nonoperative treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Safak Ekinci; Faruk Akyildiz; Kenan Koca; Omer Ersen; Sebahattin Sari
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2015-04-15

5.  Predicting success or failure of brace treatment for adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Eric Chalmers; Lindsey Westover; Johith Jacob; Andreas Donauer; Vicky H Zhao; Eric C Parent; Marc J Moreau; James K Mahood; Douglas M Hedden; Edmond H M Lou
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Vertebral body stapling as an alternative in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  P D Trobisch; A Samdani; P Cahill; R R Betz
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.154

7.  Introduction to the "Scoliosis" Journal Brace Technology Thematic Series: increasing existing knowledge and promoting future developments.

Authors:  Stefano Negrini; Theodoros B Grivas
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2010-01-28

8.  Effects of bracing in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Stuart L Weinstein; Lori A Dolan; James G Wright; Matthew B Dobbs
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Treatment of thoraco-lumbar curves in adolescent females affected by idiopathic scoliosis with a progressive action short brace (PASB): assessment of results according to the SRS committee on bracing and nonoperative management standardization criteria.

Authors:  Angelo G Aulisa; Vincenzo Guzzanti; Marco Galli; Carlo Perisano; Francesco Falciglia; Lorenzo Aulisa
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2009-09-18

10.  Application of different measures of skeletal maturity in initiating weaning from a brace for scoliosis: two case reports.

Authors:  Louann Rivett; Alan Rothberg; Aimee Stewart; Rowan Berkowitz
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2009-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.