Literature DB >> 26728608

The use of a photogrammetric method for the three-dimensional evaluation of spinal correction in scoliosis.

Eric Berthonnaud1,2,3, Patrice Papin4, Julie Deceuninck5, Radwan Hilmi4, Jean Claude Bernard6, Joannes Dimnet7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Clinical parameters, characterizing the spinal deformations due to scoliosis, are still directly measured on the spinal curve plane projections.
METHODS: A 3D spinal curve has been reconstructed from its two projections, using photogrammetric techniques. Each spinal curve is a compound of several plane regions, where it is purely flexed, and short zones of connection, where abduction and axial rotation components are concentrated. All spinal curves are represented as linear chains of regional planes articulated together. The regional plane is represented by a triangle, where one summit corresponds to the point of maximum offset. The set of weight forces, representing pelvis and spine, forms a bundle of vertical forces. The dispersion of the bundle illustrates the postural stability of patients. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: The first objective was to numerically describe the changes of the 3D spinal feature, due to the correcting treatment. Changes are calculated from the comparison between 3D radiologic situations, between before and after treatment. The second objective was to determine the direction of the external force, which would be the most efficient for correcting the patient set spine/rib cage. A mild mechanical analysis is proposed, for representing the transit of the external force, from rib cage to thoracic regional plane.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D geometric structure of deformed spines; Biplanar radiography; Correcting braces; Patient global weight; Photogrammetry; Scoliosis; Simulating the bracing effects

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26728608     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-015-3080-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  13 in total

1.  Analysis of structural features of deformed spines in frontal and sagittal projections.

Authors:  E Berthonnaud; J Dimnet
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 4.790

Review 2.  Infinite models in scoliosis: a review of the literature and analysis of personal experience.

Authors:  Wen-Zhong Nie; Ming Ye; Zhen-Yu Wang
Journal:  Biomed Tech (Berl)       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.411

3.  Three dimensional analysis of brace biomechanical efficacy for patients with AIS.

Authors:  David E Lebel; Zaid Al-Aubaidi; Eyun-Jung Shin; Andrew Howard; Reinhard Zeller
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Three dimensional radiological imaging of normal lower-limb alignment in children.

Authors:  Ádám Tibor Schlégl; Kinga Szuper; Szabolcs Somoskeöy; Péter Than
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  Finite element methods in spine biomechanics research.

Authors:  L G Gilbertson; V K Goel; W Z Kong; J D Clausen
Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  1995

6.  Optimization method for 3D bracing correction of scoliosis using a finite element model.

Authors:  D Gignac; C E Aubin; J Dansereau; H Labelle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  EOS 3D Imaging: assessing the impact of brace treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Aurélien Courvoisier; Raphaël Vialle; Wafa Skalli
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 3.166

8.  Comparison of the biomechanical 3D efficiency of different brace designs for the treatment of scoliosis using a finite element model.

Authors:  Julien Clin; Carl-Eric Aubin; Stefan Parent; Archana Sangole; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  3D analysis of brace treatment in idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Aurélien Courvoisier; Xavier Drevelle; Raphael Vialle; Jean Dubousset; Wafa Skalli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Geometric Structure of 3D Spinal Curves: Plane Regions and Connecting Zones.

Authors:  E Berthonnaud; R Hilmi; J Dimnet
Journal:  ISRN Orthop       Date:  2012-02-20
View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparison of two- and three-dimensional measurement of the Cobb angle in scoliosis.

Authors:  Ricarda Lechner; David Putzer; Dietmar Dammerer; Michael Liebensteiner; Christian Bach; Martin Thaler
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Three-dimensional reconstructions of Lenke 1A curves.

Authors:  J-C Bernard; E Berthonnaud; J Deceuninck; L Journoud-Rozand; G Notin; E Chaleat-Valayer
Journal:  Scoliosis Spinal Disord       Date:  2018-02-02
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.