Literature DB >> 20093174

Effects on speech intelligibility of temporal jittering and spectral smearing of the high-frequency components of speech.

Ewen N MacDonald1, M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller, Bruce A Schneider.   

Abstract

In a previous study, we demonstrated that word recognition performance was reduced when the low-frequency components of speech (0-1.2 kHz) were distorted by temporal jittering, but not when they were distorted by spectral smearing (Pichora-Fuller et al., 2007). Temporal jittering distorts the fine structure of the speech signal with negligible alteration of either its long-term spectral or amplitude envelope characteristics. Spectral smearing simulates the effects of broadened auditory filters that occur with cochlear hearing loss (Baer and Moore, 1993). In the present study, the high-frequency components of speech (1.2-7 kHz) were distorted with jittering and smearing. Word recognition in noise for both distortion conditions was poorer than in the intact condition. However, unlike our previous study, no significant difference was found in word recognition performance in the two distorted conditions. Whereas temporal distortion seems to have a deleterious effect that cannot be attributed to spectral distortion when only the lower frequencies are distorted, when the higher frequencies are distorted both temporal and spectral distortion reduce speech intelligibility. 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20093174     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  8 in total

1.  Spatial selective auditory attention in the presence of reverberant energy: individual differences in normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Dorea Ruggles; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-12-03

2.  Normal hearing is not enough to guarantee robust encoding of suprathreshold features important in everyday communication.

Authors:  Dorea Ruggles; Hari Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Cues for Diotic and Dichotic Detection of a 500-Hz Tone in Noise Vary with Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Junwen Mao; Kelly-Jo Koch; Karen A Doherty; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-05-15

4.  Effects of age on melody and timbre perception in simulations of electro-acoustic and cochlear-implant hearing.

Authors:  Kathryn H Arehart; Naomi B H Croghan; Ramesh Kumar Muralimanohar
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Effects of age on F0 discrimination and intonation perception in simulated electric and electroacoustic hearing.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Kathryn Arehart; Christi Wise Miller; Ramesh Kumar Muralimanohar
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Effects of reverberation on brainstem representation of speech in musicians and non-musicians.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Speech-evoked ABR: Effects of age and simulated neural temporal jitter.

Authors:  Sara K Mamo; John H Grose; Emily Buss
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Acoustic voice characteristics with and without wearing a facemask.

Authors:  Duy Duong Nguyen; Patricia McCabe; Donna Thomas; Alison Purcell; Maree Doble; Daniel Novakovic; Antonia Chacon; Catherine Madill
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.