Literature DB >> 2009054

Intratester and intertester reliability of the cervical range of motion device.

D Capuano-Pucci1, W Rheault, J Aukai, M Bracke, R Day, M Pastrick.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the intratester and intertester reliability of the Cervical Range of Motion instrument (CROM) for measuring cervical flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and rotation. Twenty able-bodied subjects were tested by two testers on two different occasions. Pearson product-moment correlations for intratester reliability ranged from .63 to .90 for tester one and from .62 to .91 for tester two. Intertester reliability was good. Coefficients ranged from .80 to .87 for session one and .74 to .85 for session two. Paired data t-tests showed that there were no significant differences between testers or sessions (p = .01). The results suggest that the CROM has acceptable intratester and intertester reliability. The CROM has many benefits including ease of application and reliability. More research is needed on patients with cervical dysfunction.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1991        PMID： 2009054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN： 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  22 in total

1.  Collegiate Football Players Display More Active Cervical Spine Mobility Than High School Football Players.

Authors:  John Nyland; Darren Johnson
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  The effect of multilevel anterior cervical fusion on neck motion.

Authors:  Xiao-Dong Wu; Xin-Wei Wang; Wen Yuan; Yang Liu; Nicholas Tsai; Yu-Cheng Peng; Yu Chen; Cong Wang; Shi-Yi Gu; Hua-Jiang Chen; Xu-Hui Zhou; Hai-Long He; Yuan-Yuan Chen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Cervical range of movement in relation to neck dimension.

Authors:  Jeremy Reynolds; D Marsh; Heiko Koller; Juliane Zenenr; G Bannister
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Compensatory increase of the cervico-ocular reflex with age in healthy humans.

Authors:  W P A Kelders; G J Kleinrensink; J N van der Geest; L Feenstra; C I de Zeeuw; M A Frens
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Individual characteristics of reliable lumbar coupling motions.

Authors:  Woo-Suck Yun; Hyunho Kim; Ji Hoon Ahn; Young-Bae Park; Young-Jae Park
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  A normative study of cervical range of motion measures including the flexion-rotation test in asymptomatic children: side-to-side variability and pain provocation.

Authors:  Kim Budelmann; Harry von Piekartz; Toby Hall
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2016-09

7.  The reliability of the cervical relocation test on people with and without a history of neck pain.

Authors:  Sarah Burke; Kristina Lynch; Zakkee Moghul; Craig Young; Kristen Saviola; Ron Schenk
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2016-09

8.  Three-dimensional analysis of cervical spine motion: reliability of a computer assisted magnetic tracking device compared to inclinometer.

Authors:  Ioannis D Gelalis; Louis E DeFrate; Kosmas S Stafilas; Emilios E Pakos; James D Kang; Lars G Gilbertson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Immediate effects of inhibitive distraction on active range of cervical flexion in patients with neck pain: a pilot study.

Authors:  Kristín Briem; Peter Huijbregts; Maria Thorsteinsdottir
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2007

10.  Reproducibility of cervical range of motion in patients with neck pain.

Authors:  Jan Lucas Hoving; Jan J M Pool; Henk van Mameren; Walter J L M Devillé; Willem J J Assendelft; Henrica C W de Vet; Andrea F de Winter; Bart W Koes; Lex M Bouter
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2005-12-13       Impact factor: 2.362
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.