Literature DB >> 19066648

Immediate effects of inhibitive distraction on active range of cervical flexion in patients with neck pain: a pilot study.

Kristín Briem, Peter Huijbregts, Maria Thorsteinsdottir.   

Abstract

The purpose of this pilot study was to examine the immediate effects of a manual therapy technique called Inhibitive Distraction (ID) on active range of motion (AROM) for cervical flexion in patients with neck pain with or without concomitant headache. A secondary objective of this study was to see whether patient subgroups could be identified who might benefit more from ID by studying variables such as age, pain intensity, presence of headache, or pre-intervention AROM. We also looked at patients' ability to identify pre- to post-intervention changes in their ability to actively move through a range of motion. Forty subjects (mean age 34.7 years; range 16-48 years) referred to a physical therapy clinic due to discomfort in the neck region were randomly assigned to an experimental and a control group. We used the CROM goniometer to measure pre- and post-intervention cervical flexion AROM in the sagittal plane within a single treatment session. The between-group difference in AROM increase was not statistically significant at P<0.05 with a mean post-intervention increase in ROM of 2.4 degrees (SD 6.2 degrees ) for the experimental group and 1.2 degrees (SD 5.8 degrees ) for the placebo group. We were also unable to identify potential subgroups more likely to respond to ID, although a trend emerged for greater improvement in chronic patients with headaches, lower pain levels, and less pre-intervention AROM. In the experimental group and in both groups combined, subjects noting increased AROM indeed had a significantly greater increase in AROM than those subjects not noting improvement. In conclusion, this study did not confirm immediate effects of ID on cervical flexion AROM but did provide indications for potential subgroups likely to benefit from this technique. Recommendations are provided with regard to future research and clinical use of the technique studied.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Active Range of Motion; Cervical; Inhibitive Distraction; Neck Pain; Pilot Study

Year:  2007        PMID: 19066648      PMCID: PMC2565604          DOI: 10.1179/106698107790819882

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Man Manip Ther        ISSN: 1066-9817


  36 in total

1.  Normal range of motion of the cervical spine: an initial goniometric study.

Authors:  J W Youdas; T R Garrett; V J Suman; C L Bogard; H O Hallman; J R Carey
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1992-11

2.  Intratester and intertester reliability of the cervical range of motion device.

Authors:  D Capuano-Pucci; W Rheault; J Aukai; M Bracke; R Day; M Pastrick
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  Cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility in patients with chronic, nontraumatic cervical spine pain.

Authors:  G D Rix; J Bagust
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  Effectiveness of dynamic muscle training, relaxation training, or ordinary activity for chronic neck pain: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Matti Viljanen; Antti Malmivaara; Jukka Uitti; Marjo Rinne; Pirjo Palmroos; Pekka Laippala
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-08-30

5.  Effects of tendon pressure on alpha motoneuron excitability in patients with stroke.

Authors:  J A Leone; C G Kukulka
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1988-04

6.  Effects of intermittent tendon pressure on alpha motoneuron excitability.

Authors:  C G Kukulka; S M Beckman; J B Holte; P K Hoppenworth
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1986-07

7.  Effect of tendon pressure on alpha motoneuron excitability.

Authors:  C G Kukulka; W A Fellows; J E Oehlertz; S G Vanderwilt
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1985-05

8.  Chronic spinal pain: a randomized clinical trial comparing medication, acupuncture, and spinal manipulation.

Authors:  Lynton G F Giles; Reinhold Muller
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Chronic neck pain of traumatic and non-traumatic origin: a population-based study.

Authors:  Michel Guez; Christer Hildingsson; Birgitta Stegmayr; Göran Toolanen
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2003-10

Review 10.  Cervicogenic headaches: a critical review.

Authors:  S Haldeman; S Dagenais
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.166

View more
  4 in total

1.  Positive cervical artery testing in a patient with chronic whiplash syndrome: clinical decision-making in the presence of diagnostic uncertainty.

Authors:  David L Graziano; Wanda Nitsch; Peter A Huijbregts
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2007

2.  Manipulation and Mobilization for Treating Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis for an Appropriateness Panel.

Authors:  Ian D Coulter; Cindy Crawford; Howard Vernon; Eric L Hurwitz; Raheleh Khorsan; Marika Suttorp Booth; Patricia M Herman
Journal:  Pain Physician       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 4.965

3.  Development of an attention-touch control for manual cervical distraction: a pilot randomized clinical trial for patients with neck pain.

Authors:  M Ram Gudavalli; Stacie A Salsbury; Robert D Vining; Cynthia R Long; Lance Corber; Avinash G Patwardhan; Christine M Goertz
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 4.  Efficacy of massage therapy on pain and dysfunction in patients with neck pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yong Hong Cheng; Gui Cheng Huang
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 2.629

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.