Literature DB >> 19352730

Cervical range of movement in relation to neck dimension.

Jeremy Reynolds1, D Marsh, Heiko Koller, Juliane Zenenr, G Bannister.   

Abstract

The authors investigated the effect of neck dimension upon cervical range of motion. Data relating to 100 healthy subjects, aged between 20 and 40 years, were recorded with respect to age, gender and range of motion in three planes. Additionally, two widely used methods of measuring neck motion, chin-sternal distance and uniplanar goniometer, were assessed against a validated measurement tool, the 'CROM goniometer'. Using multiple linear regression analysis it was determined that sagittal flexion (P = 0.002) and lateral rotation (P < 0.0001) were most closely related to neck circumference alone whereas lateral flexion (P < 0.0001) was most closely related to a ratio of circumference and length of neck. Hence, assessing cervical range of motion as outcome variable or as a measure at posttreatment follow-up, neck circumference was shown to be one of the factors influencing total neck motion, particularly sagittal flexion and lateral tilt. Comparison of cervical range of motion assessed with a validated measurement tool, the CROM goniometer, with results of both frequently applied clinician's instruments, the uniplanar goniometer and measurement of chin-sternal distance, showed low reliability with the latter techniques, and motion values measured with these techniques should be interpreted with caution if using them for comparison of cervical range of motion of alike groups. We demonstrated that neck dimension should be incorporated into cervical functional outcome assessment and one should be wary about recorded values for neck motion from non-validated measurement tools.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19352730      PMCID: PMC2899663          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-0894-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  25 in total

1.  Normal global motion of the cervical spine: an electrogoniometric study.

Authors:  V Feipel; B Rondelet; J Le Pallec; M Rooze
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Reliability and concurrent validity of two instruments for measuring cervical range of motion: effects of age and gender.

Authors:  D E Hole; J M Cook; J E Bolton
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  1995-11

Review 3.  Assessment of published reliability studies for cervical spine range-of-motion measurement tools.

Authors:  K Jordan
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.437

4.  The ability to reproduce the neutral zero position of the head.

Authors:  H W Christensen; N Nilsson
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.437

5.  Normal range of motion of the cervical spine: an initial goniometric study.

Authors:  J W Youdas; T R Garrett; V J Suman; C L Bogard; H O Hallman; J R Carey
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1992-11

6.  Meta-analysis of normative cervical motion.

Authors:  J Chen; A B Solinger; J F Poncet; C A Lantz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Prevalence and predictors of intense, chronic, and disabling neck and back pain in the UK general population.

Authors:  Roger Webb; Therese Brammah; Mark Lunt; Michelle Urwin; Tim Allison; Deborah Symmons
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Prevalence, determinants, and consequences of chronic neck pain in Finland.

Authors:  M Mäkelä; M Heliövaara; K Sievers; O Impivaara; P Knekt; A Aromaa
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1991-12-01       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Measuring passive cervical motion: a study of reliability.

Authors:  N Nilsson
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 1.437

10.  Cervical range of motion and cephalic kinesthesis: ultrasonographic analysis by age and sex.

Authors:  Samantha Demaille-Wlodyka; Christophe Chiquet; Jean-François Lavaste; Wafa Skalli; Michel Revel; Serge Poiraudeau
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  7 in total

1.  The influence of age, anthropometrics and range of motion on the morphometry of the synovial folds of the lateral atlanto-axial joints: a pilot study.

Authors:  Alexandra Webb; Angela Darekar; Hamid Rassoulian
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-08-14       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Cervical range of motion and strength in 4,293 young male adults with chronic neck pain.

Authors:  Max Daniel Kauther; Michael Piotrowski; Bjoern Hussmann; Sven Lendemans; Christian Wedemeyer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Impact of secondary lymphedema after head and neck cancer treatment on symptoms, functional status, and quality of life.

Authors:  Jie Deng; Barbara A Murphy; Mary S Dietrich; Nancy Wells; Kenneth A Wallston; Robert J Sinard; Anthony J Cmelak; Jill Gilbert; Sheila H Ridner
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 3.147

4.  Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy of Tailored Yoga in Survivors of Head and Neck Cancer: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Melissa Adair; Barbara Murphy; Sujatha Yarlagadda; Jie Deng; Mary S Dietrich; Sheila H Ridner
Journal:  Integr Cancer Ther       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 3.279

5.  Reliability of the universal goniometer for assessing active cervical range of motion in asymptomatic healthy persons.

Authors:  Muhammad Nazim Farooq; Mohammad A Mohseni Bandpei; Mudassar Ali; Ghazanfar Ali Khan
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.088

6.  Predictive performance of a multivariable difficult intubation model for obese patients.

Authors:  Arunotai Siriussawakul; Patcharee Maboonyanon; Subongkot Kueprakone; Suthasinee Samankatiwat; Chulaluk Komoltri; Chayanan Thanakiattiwibun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Differences in Demographic and Radiographic Characteristics between Patients with Visible and Invisible T1 Slopes on Lateral Cervical Radiographic Images.

Authors:  Sadayuki Ito; Hiroaki Nakashima; Akiyuki Matsumoto; Kei Ando; Masaaki Machino; Naoki Segi; Hiroyuki Tomita; Hiroyuki Koshimizu; Shiro Imagama
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 4.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.