Literature DB >> 11077191

Neuronal responses in cat primary auditory cortex to natural and altered species-specific calls.

D D Gehr1, H Komiya, J J Eggermont.   

Abstract

We investigated how natural and morphed cat vocalizations are represented in primary auditory cortex (AI). About 40% of the neurons showed time-locked responses to major peaks in the vocalization envelope, 60% only responded at the onset. Simultaneously recorded multi-unit (MU) activity of these peak-tracking neurons on separate electrodes was significantly more synchronous during stimulation than under silence. Thus, the representation of the vocalizations is likely synchronously distributed across the cortex. The sum of the responses to the low and high frequency part of the meow, with the boundary at 2.5 kHz, was larger than the neuronal response to the natural meow itself, suggesting that strong lateral inhibition is shaping the response to the natural meow. In this sense, the neurons are combination-sensitive. The frequency-tuning properties and the response to amplitude-modulated tones of the MU recordings can explain the responses to natural, and temporally and spectrally altered vocalizations. Analysis of the mutual information in the firing rate suggests that the activity of at least 95 recording sites in AI would be needed to reliably distinguish between the nine different vocalizations. This suggests that a distributed representation based on temporal stimulus aspects may be more efficient than one based on firing rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11077191     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(00)00170-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  31 in total

1.  Evolutionary aspects of bat echolocation.

Authors:  G Neuweiler
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-03-28       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Subset of thin spike cortical neurons preserve the peripheral encoding of stimulus onsets.

Authors:  Frank G Lin; Robert C Liu
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Emergence of invariant representation of vocalizations in the auditory cortex.

Authors:  Isaac M Carruthers; Diego A Laplagne; Andrew Jaegle; John J Briguglio; Laetitia Mwilambwe-Tshilobo; Ryan G Natan; Maria N Geffen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Temporal context in speech processing and attentional stream selection: a behavioral and neural perspective.

Authors:  Elana M Zion Golumbic; David Poeppel; Charles E Schroeder
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2012-01-29       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Representation of species-specific vocalizations in the medial geniculate body of the guinea pig.

Authors:  Daniel Suta; Jirí Popelár; Eugen Kvasnák; Josef Syka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Stimulus-dependent auditory tuning results in synchronous population coding of vocalizations in the songbird midbrain.

Authors:  Sarah M N Woolley; Patrick R Gill; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Maximum decoding abilities of temporal patterns and synchronized firings: application to auditory neurons responding to click trains and amplitude modulated white noise.

Authors:  Boris Gourévitch; Jos J Eggermont
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 1.621

8.  Right-hemisphere auditory cortex is dominant for coding syllable patterns in speech.

Authors:  Daniel A Abrams; Trent Nicol; Steven Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Efficient encoding of vocalizations in the auditory midbrain.

Authors:  Lars A Holmstrom; Lonneke B M Eeuwes; Patrick D Roberts; Christine V Portfors
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Encoding of temporal information by timing, rate, and place in cat auditory cortex.

Authors:  Kazuo Imaizumi; Nicholas J Priebe; Tatyana O Sharpee; Steven W Cheung; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.