Literature DB >> 20089811

The decerebrate cat generates the essential features of the force constraint strategy.

Claire F Honeycutt1, T Richard Nichols.   

Abstract

Cats actively respond to horizontal perturbations of the supporting surface according to the force constraint strategy. In this strategy, the force responses fall into two groups oriented in either rostral and medial directions or caudal and lateral directions, rather than in strict opposition to the direction of perturbation. When the distance between forelimbs and hindlimbs is decreased, the responses are less constrained and directed more in line with the perturbation. We have recently shown that electromyographic responses from limb muscles of the decerebrate cat resemble those obtained in the intact animal. Our objectives here were to determine whether the decerebrate cat preparation would also exhibit the force constraint strategy and whether that strategy would exhibit the characteristic dependence on limb position on the strategy. Horizontal support surface perturbations were delivered and three-dimensional exerted forces were recorded from all four limbs. Clustered force responses were generated by all four limbs and were found to be statistically indistinguishable between animals decerebrated using two different levels of transection. The directionality of the force responses was preserved throughout successive time epochs during the perturbations. In addition, the clustering of force responses increased with distance between forelimbs and hindlimbs. These results indicate that the force constraint strategy used by terrestrial animals to maintain stability can be generated without the assistance of the cerebral cortices and without prior training. This suggests an important role for the lower brain stem and spinal cord in generating an appropriate strategy to maintain stability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20089811      PMCID: PMC2888247          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00764.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  32 in total

1.  Weight support and balance during perturbed stance in the chronic spinal cat.

Authors:  J M Macpherson; J Fung
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Ratio of shear to load ground-reaction force may underlie the directional tuning of the automatic postural response to rotation and translation.

Authors:  Lena H Ting; Jane M Macpherson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-04-14       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Biomechanical capabilities influence postural control strategies in the cat hindlimb.

Authors:  J Lucas McKay; Thomas J Burkholder; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Decerebrate Rigidity, and Reflex Coordination of Movements.

Authors:  C S Sherrington
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1898-02-17       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Electromyographic responses from the hindlimb muscles of the decerebrate cat to horizontal support surface perturbations.

Authors:  Claire F Honeycutt; Jinger S Gottschall; T Richard Nichols
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The pontomedullary reticular formation contributes to the compensatory postural responses observed following removal of the support surface in the standing cat.

Authors:  Paul J Stapley; Trevor Drew
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Strategies that simplify the control of quadrupedal stance. I. Forces at the ground.

Authors:  J M Macpherson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  The force constraint strategy for stance is independent of prior experience.

Authors:  J M Macpherson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Paralysis elicited by spinal cord injury evokes selective disassembly of neuromuscular synapses with and without terminal sprouting in ankle flexors of the adult rat.

Authors:  Anthony S Burns; Sabiha Jawaid; Hui Zhong; Hiroyuki Yoshihara; Srishti Bhagat; Marion Murray; Roland R Roy; Alan Tessler; Young-Jin Son
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 3.215

10.  Postural performance in decerebrated rabbit.

Authors:  P E Musienko; P V Zelenin; V F Lyalka; G N Orlovsky; T G Deliagina
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-16       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  22 in total

1.  Evidence for reticulospinal contributions to coordinated finger movements in humans.

Authors:  Claire Fletcher Honeycutt; Michael Kharouta; Eric Jon Perreault
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The mechanical actions of muscles predict the direction of muscle activation during postural perturbations in the cat hindlimb.

Authors:  Claire F Honeycutt; T Richard Nichols
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Disruption of cutaneous feedback alters magnitude but not direction of muscle responses to postural perturbations in the decerebrate cat.

Authors:  Claire F Honeycutt; T Richard Nichols
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  An animal model to evaluate skin-implant-bone integration and gait with a prosthesis directly attached to the residual limb.

Authors:  Brad J Farrell; Boris I Prilutsky; Robert S Kistenberg; John F Dalton; Mark Pitkin
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 2.063

5.  Encoding of force increases and decreases by tibial campaniform sensilla in the stick insect, Carausius morosus.

Authors:  Sasha N Zill; Ansgar Büschges; Josef Schmitz
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 6.  Physiological and circuit mechanisms of postural control.

Authors:  Tatiana G Deliagina; Pavel V Zelenin; Grigori N Orlovsky
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 6.627

7.  Body stability and muscle and motor cortex activity during walking with wide stance.

Authors:  Brad J Farrell; Margarita A Bulgakova; Irina N Beloozerova; Mikhail G Sirota; Boris I Prilutsky
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Limb and trunk mechanisms for balance control during locomotion in quadrupeds.

Authors:  Pavel E Musienko; Tatiana G Deliagina; Yury P Gerasimenko; Grigori N Orlovsky; Pavel V Zelenin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Deficits in startle-evoked arm movements increase with impairment following stroke.

Authors:  Claire Fletcher Honeycutt; Eric Jon Perreault
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Characterization and Early Detection of Balance Deficits in Fragile X Premutation Carriers With and Without Fragile X-Associated Tremor/Ataxia Syndrome (FXTAS).

Authors:  Joan A O'Keefe; Erin Robertson-Dick; Emily J Dunn; Yan Li; Youping Deng; Amber N Fiutko; Elizabeth Berry-Kravis; Deborah A Hall
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.847

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.