Literature DB >> 20089739

A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of in vivo and in vitro photostimulable phosphor digital images in the detection of occlusal caries lesions.

K Kamburoglu1, B Senel, S P Yüksel, T Ozen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of diagnoses of occlusal caries lesions from digital images captured using a photostimulable phosphor (PSP) sensor under in vivo and in vitro conditions and to present useful clinical data regarding the clinical application of the system.
METHODS: The study sample comprised 60 mandibular third molars (30 sound and 30 with occlusal caries) requiring extraction. A pre-extraction and post-extraction image of each tooth were acquired using a PSP sensor. A stopwatch was used to record the time required for the clinical procedures. Patient comfort or discomfort during image acquisition was also recorded. Images were evaluated twice by three observers using a five-point scale. Kappa coefficients were calculated to assess intra- and interobserver agreement. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the diagnostic performance of each observer for both in vivo and in vitro images. The t-test was used to compare A(z) values, with a significance level set at 0.05 (alpha _ 0.05). The time required for clinical imaging procedures in patients who claimed discomfort and in those who did not was compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test.
RESULTS: Intraobserver agreement was almost perfect, whereas interobserver agreement was fair to moderate. No statistically significant differences were found in the accuracy of diagnoses of occlusal caries lesions using in vivo and in vitro digital images. The median time needed for image exposure was 1.04 min and the median time needed to complete the image acquisition procedure was 1.45 min.
CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of accuracy of occlusal caries lesions using in vivo and in vitro digital images yielded similar results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20089739      PMCID: PMC3520404          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/91657756

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  22 in total

Review 1.  Dental photostimulable phosphor radiography.

Authors:  C F Hildebolt; R A Couture; B R Whiting
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2000-04

2.  Diagnosis of artificially induced external root resorption using conventional intraoral film radiography, CCD, and PSP: an ex vivo study.

Authors:  Kivanç Kamburoğlu; Igor Tsesis; Anda Kfir; Israel Kaffe
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2008-06-11

3.  Detection of in vitro proximal caries in storage phosphor plate radiographs scanned with different resolutions.

Authors:  G Li; W E R Berkhout; G C H Sanderink; M Martins; P F van der Stelt
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Reliability of radiographic interpretations.

Authors:  M Goldman; A H Pearson; N Darzenta
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1974-08

5.  A comparative evaluation of the diagnostic efficacy of film and digital sensors for detection of simulated periapical lesions.

Authors:  J A Wallace; M K Nair; M F Colaco; S F Kapa
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2001-07

6.  Validity of diagnosis of questionable caries lesions in occlusal surfaces of extracted third molars.

Authors:  A Wenzel; O Fejerskov
Journal:  Caries Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Accuracy of caries detection with four storage phosphor systems and E-speed radiographs.

Authors:  H Hintze; A Wenzel; M Frydenberg
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Detection of occlusal caries without cavitation by visual inspection, film radiographs, xeroradiographs, and digitized radiographs.

Authors:  A Wenzel; M J Larsen; O Fejerskov
Journal:  Caries Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Radiographic detection of occlusal caries in noncavitated teeth. A comparison of conventional film radiographs, digitized film radiographs, and RadioVisioGraphy.

Authors:  A Wenzel; H Hintze; L Mikkelsen; F Mouyen
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1991-11

10.  In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions.

Authors:  H Hintze; A Wenzel; C Jones
Journal:  Caries Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.056

View more
  6 in total

1.  Effect of tube potential and image receptor on the detection of natural proximal caries in primary teeth.

Authors:  Elif Sogur; B Güniz Baksı; Kaan Orhan; S Candan Paksoy; Salih Dogan; Yılmaz S Erdal; Ali Mert
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Validity of wax and acrylic as soft-tissue simulation materials used in in vitro radiographic studies.

Authors:  L Schropp; N S Alyass; A Wenzel; A Stavropoulos
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Occlusal caries depth measurements obtained by five different imaging modalities.

Authors:  Kivanç Kamburoğlu; Hakan Kurt; Eray Kolsuz; Bengi Öztaş; Ilkan Tatar; Hakan Hamdi Çelik
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Accuracy of conventional and digital radiography in detecting external root resorption.

Authors:  Abbas Mesgarani; Sina Haghanifar; Maryam Ehsani; Samereh Dokhte Yaghub; Ali Bijani
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2014-10-07

5.  In vitro Evaluation of the Relationship between Gray Scales in Digital Intraoral Radiographs and Hounsfield Units in CT Scans.

Authors:  L Khojastepour; S Mohammadzadeh; M Jazayeri; M Omidi
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2017-09-01

6.  Clinical comparison of intraoral CMOS and PSP detectors in terms of time efficiency, patient comfort, and subjective image quality.

Authors:  Kıvanç Kamburoğlu; Erçin Samunahmetoğlu; Nejlan Eratam; Gül Sönmez; Sevilay Karahan
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2022-02-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.