Literature DB >> 20085391

Access with evidence development: the US experience.

Penny E Mohr1, Sean R Tunis.   

Abstract

The concept of access with evidence development (AED), also known as 'coverage with evidence development' in the Medicare programme, has long been discussed as a policy option for ensuring more appropriate use of new technologies in the US. This article provides a comprehensive overview of more than 10 years of US experience with AED, both in the public and private healthcare sectors. Beginning with a discussion of the successes of private plans' conditional coverage for high-density chemotherapy for autologous bone marrow transplants for metastatic breast cancer and Medicare's conditional coverage of lung-volume-reduction surgery in the 1990s, the article moves on to describe how Medicare worked to codify AED as one of its coverage policy options in the early part of this decade. More recent private and public sector initiatives are also discussed, including an overview of barriers to implementing AED. Despite the complexity of political, financial and ethical issues faced in implementation, AED is now a permanent fixture of US coverage policy. Future initiatives within the Medicare programme and with private payers in the US are much more likely to succeed by relying upon the simple but consequential principles laid out at a Summit convened in Banff, Alberta, Canada in 2009 and presented in another article in this issue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20085391     DOI: 10.2165/11531050-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  15 in total

1.  Managing coverage for clinical trials.

Authors:  L N Newcomer
Journal:  Eff Clin Pract       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct

2.  The controversy over high-dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow transplant for breast cancer.

Authors:  M M Mello; T A Brennan
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 3.  High-dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow transplantation for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  D M Eddy
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Coverage options for promising technologies: Medicare's 'coverage with evidence development'.

Authors:  Sean R Tunis; Steven D Pearson
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  The evidence dilemma in genomic medicine.

Authors:  Muin J Khoury; Al Berg; Ralph Coates; James Evans; Steven M Teutsch; Linda A Bradley
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Principles of design of access with evidence development approaches: a consensus statement from the Banff Summit.

Authors:  Devidas Menon; Christopher J McCabe; Tania Stafinski; Richard Edlin
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Prospective, randomized comparison of high-dose chemotherapy with stem-cell support versus intermediate-dose chemotherapy after surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy in women with high-risk primary breast cancer: a report of CALGB 9082, SWOG 9114, and NCIC MA-13.

Authors:  William P Peters; Gary L Rosner; James J Vredenburgh; Elizabeth J Shpall; Michael Crump; Paul G Richardson; Michael W Schuster; Lawrence B Marks; Constance Cirrincione; Larry Norton; I C Henderson; Richard L Schilsky; David D Hurd
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-03-14       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Using clinical trials as a condition of coverage: lessons from the National Emphysema Treatment Trial.

Authors:  Tanisha Carino; Steven Sheingold; Sean Tunis
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.486

9.  Conventional-dose chemotherapy compared with high-dose chemotherapy plus autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation for metastatic breast cancer. Philadelphia Bone Marrow Transplant Group.

Authors:  E A Stadtmauer; A O'Neill; L J Goldstein; P A Crilley; K F Mangan; J N Ingle; I Brodsky; S Martino; H M Lazarus; J K Erban; C Sickles; J H Glick
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-04-13       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  A randomized trial comparing lung-volume-reduction surgery with medical therapy for severe emphysema.

Authors:  Alfred Fishman; Fernando Martinez; Keith Naunheim; Steven Piantadosi; Robert Wise; Andrew Ries; Gail Weinmann; Douglas E Wood
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-05-20       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  12 in total

1.  How comparative effectiveness research can help advance 'personalized medicine' in cancer treatment.

Authors:  Scott D Ramsey; David Veenstra; Sean R Tunis; Louis Garrison; John J Crowley; Laurence H Baker
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Single technology appraisal at the UK National Institute for Health and clinical excellence: a source of evidence and analysis for decision making internationally.

Authors:  Mark Sculpher
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  What is the value of oncology medicines?

Authors:  Joshua Cohen; William Looney
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  Principles of design of access with evidence development approaches: a consensus statement from the Banff Summit.

Authors:  Devidas Menon; Christopher J McCabe; Tania Stafinski; Richard Edlin
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  We know accurately only when we know little.

Authors:  Stuart MacLeod; Craig Mitton
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Overhauling the reimbursement system for molecular diagnostics.

Authors:  Nafees N Malik
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  Reference pricing with evidence development: a way forward for proton therapy.

Authors:  Justin E Bekelman; Stephen M Hahn
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Risk sharing arrangements for pharmaceuticals: potential considerations and recommendations for European payers.

Authors:  Jakub Adamski; Brian Godman; Gabriella Ofierska-Sujkowska; Bogusława Osińska; Harald Herholz; Kamila Wendykowska; Ott Laius; Saira Jan; Catherine Sermet; Corrine Zara; Marija Kalaba; Roland Gustafsson; Kristina Garuolienè; Alan Haycox; Silvio Garattini; Lars L Gustafsson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 9.  Building the evidence base for decision making in cancer genomic medicine using comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Katrina A B Goddard; William A Knaus; Evelyn Whitlock; Gary H Lyman; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Sheri D Schully; Scott Ramsey; Sean Tunis; Andrew N Freedman; Muin J Khoury; David L Veenstra
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 10.  A proposed approach to accelerate evidence generation for genomic-based technologies in the context of a learning health system.

Authors:  Christine Y Lu; Marc S Williams; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Sengwee Toh; Jeff S Brown; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.