Literature DB >> 16966717

Coverage options for promising technologies: Medicare's 'coverage with evidence development'.

Sean R Tunis1, Steven D Pearson.   

Abstract

In April 2005 the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) posted on its Web site a draft guidance document describing a new approach to coverage policy called "coverage with evidence development" (CED). CED offered an option for coverage of promising drugs, biologics, devices, diagnostics, and procedures that would not otherwise meet Medicare's evidentiary standards for being "reasonable and necessary." An updated guidance was posted 12 July 2006, clarifying several key statutory, regulatory, and operational issues. This paper traces the history of this policy approach, explains the rationale behind the policy, and describes the major challenges that will need to be addressed for CED to become an important advance in evidence-based coverage decision making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16966717     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.5.1218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  46 in total

1.  Biopharmaceuticals: the economic equation.

Authors:  Erwin A Blackstone; Joseph P Fuhr
Journal:  Biotechnol Healthc       Date:  2007-12

2.  Health reforms as examples of multilevel interventions in cancer care.

Authors:  Ann B Flood; Mary L Fennell; Kelly J Devers
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2012-05

3.  Medicare's Coverage With Evidence Development: A Policy-Making Tool in Evolution.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 4.  Using comparative effectiveness research to inform policy and practice in the UK HHS: past, present and future.

Authors:  Kalipso Chalkidou; Tom Walley
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  International comparison of comparative effectiveness research in five jurisdictions: insights for the US.

Authors:  Adrian R Levy; Craig Mitton; Karissa M Johnston; Brian Harrigan; Andrew H Briggs
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  A policy approach to the development of molecular diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Kevin A Schulman; Sean R Tunis
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  Use of economic evaluation in decision making: evidence and recommendations for improvement.

Authors:  Steven Simoens
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  The National Emphysema Treatment Trial (NETT): a study in agency collaboration.

Authors:  Gail G Weinmann; Yen-Pin Chiang; Steven Sheingold
Journal:  Proc Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2008-05-01

Review 9.  Funding the unfundable: mechanisms for managing uncertainty in decisions on the introduction of new and innovative technologies into healthcare systems.

Authors:  Tania Stafinski; Christopher J McCabe; Devidas Menon
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  Personalized medicine and genomics: challenges and opportunities in assessing effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and future research priorities.

Authors:  Rena Conti; David L Veenstra; Katrina Armstrong; Lawrence J Lesko; Scott D Grosse
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 2.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.