Literature DB >> 18997217

The evidence dilemma in genomic medicine.

Muin J Khoury1, Al Berg, Ralph Coates, James Evans, Steven M Teutsch, Linda A Bradley.   

Abstract

An ongoing dilemma in genomic medicine is balancing the need for scientific innovation with appropriate evidence thresholds for moving technology into practice. The current low threshold allows unsubstantiated technologies to enter into practice, with the potential to overwhelm the health system. Alternatively, establishing an excessively high threshold for evidence could slow the integration of genomics into practice and present disincentives for investing in research and development. Also, variable coverage and reimbursement policies can lead to differential access to technology, exacerbating health disparities. There is an urgent need for a collaborative process for appropriate transition of genomic discoveries from research to practice.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18997217     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.6.1600

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  46 in total

1.  Multilevel research and the challenges of implementing genomic medicine.

Authors:  Muin J Khoury; Ralph J Coates; Mary L Fennell; Russell E Glasgow; Maren T Scheuner; Sheri D Schully; Marc S Williams; Steven B Clauser
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2012-05

2.  A population approach to precision medicine.

Authors:  Muin J Khoury; Marta L Gwinn; Russell E Glasgow; Barnett S Kramer
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Coverage policy development for personalized medicine: private payer perspectives on developing policy for the 21-gene assay.

Authors:  Julia R Trosman; Stephanie L Van Bebber; Kathryn A Phillips
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.840

4.  Which Results to Return: Subjective Judgments in Selecting Medically Actionable Genes.

Authors:  Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz; John M Conley; Arlene M Davis; Anya E R Prince; R Jean Cadigan
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2017-02-01

Review 5.  Challenges of translating genetic tests into clinical and public health practice.

Authors:  Wolf H Rogowski; Scott D Grosse; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Access with evidence development: the US experience.

Authors:  Penny E Mohr; Sean R Tunis
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  Developing the blueprint for a genetic testing registry.

Authors:  G Javitt; S Katsanis; J Scott; K Hudson
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 2.000

8.  Using Public-Private Partnerships to Mitigate Disparities in Access to Genetic Services: Lessons from Wisconsin.

Authors:  Laura Senier; Matthew Kearney; Jason Orne
Journal:  Adv Med Sociol       Date:  2015

9.  Risk assessment and communication tools for genotype associations with multifactorial phenotypes: the concept of "edge effect" and cultivating an ethical bridge between omics innovations and society.

Authors:  Vural Ozdemir; Guilherme Suarez-Kurtz; Raphaëlle Stenne; Andrew A Somogyi; Toshiyuki Someya; S Oğuz Kayaalp; Eugene Kolker
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2009-02

10.  Translational research in cancer genetics: the road less traveled.

Authors:  S D Schully; C B Benedicto; E M Gillanders; S S Wang; M J Khoury
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 2.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.