Literature DB >> 20082530

Preliminary evaluation of a combined microPET-MR system.

R C Hawkes1, T D Fryer, S Siegel, R E Ansorge, T A Carpenter.   

Abstract

There are many motivations for adding simultaneously acquired MR images to PET scanning. The most straight forward are, superior registration of MR and PET images, the addition of morphological detail when there is non-rigid motion and for pre-clinical studies simultaneous imaging could lead to a significant reduction in the time that animals are required to be anesthetised. In addition simultaneous MR has the potential to provide accurate motion correction for PET image reconstruction. For functional imaging simultaneous acquisition is required to assess the subject in the same physiological state, such as acute stroke studies. The elimination of the additional radiation associated with combining CT with PET, by providing anatomic detail with MR, would be a crucial advantage for cancer screening. Combining the two instruments necessitates some engineering tradeoffs, especially associated with the use of the highly developed photomultiplier tube (PMT) used for light amplification, because of its incompatibility with strong magnetic fields. Our approach is to provide a split in the magnet and gradients to locate the magnetic sensitive components, the PMTs, in regions of low magnetic field, leaving only the essential PET components, the scintillator blocks, in the strong magnetic field region. The crystals are coupled to the PMTs by extending the optical fibres. A further advantage accrues by moving the PET electronics out of the region seen by the MR radio-frequency (RF) and gradient coils as electromagnetic interference effects between the PET and MR systems, which could cause artefacts in either modality, are eliminated. Here we describe a preliminary evaluation of the system, which is essentially a microPET Focus-120 located in a 1T split magnet, and compare its performance to previous microPET instruments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20082530      PMCID: PMC4304007          DOI: 10.1177/153303461000900106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 1533-0338


  11 in total

1.  Determining Block Detector Positions for PET Scanners.

Authors:  Larry Pierce; Robert Miyaoka; Tom Lewellen; Adam Alessio; Paul Kinahan
Journal:  IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec (1997)       Date:  2009-10-24

2.  Depth of interaction resolution measurements for a high resolution PET detector using position sensitive avalanche photodiodes.

Authors:  Yongfeng Yang; Purushottam A Dokhale; Robert W Silverman; Kanai S Shah; Mickel A McClish; Richard Farrell; Gerald Entine; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-04-10       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 3.  PET/MRI system design.

Authors:  Gaspar Delso; Sibylle Ziegler
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  A method for measuring the absolute sensitivity of positron emission tomographic scanners.

Authors:  D L Bailey; T Jones; T J Spinks
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1991

5.  Exact and approximate rebinning algorithms for 3-D PET data.

Authors:  M Defrise; P E Kinahan; D W Townsend; C Michel; M Sibomana; D F Newport
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Treatment of axial data in three-dimensional PET.

Authors:  M E Daube-Witherspoon; G Muehllehner
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Performance evaluation of the microPET R4 PET scanner for rodents.

Authors:  Christof Knoess; Stefan Siegel; Anne Smith; Danny Newport; Norbert Richerzhagen; Alexandra Winkeler; Andreas Jacobs; Rhonda N Goble; Rudolf Graf; Klaus Wienhard; Wolf-Dieter Heiss
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Split gradient coils for simultaneous PET-MRI.

Authors:  Michael Poole; Richard Bowtell; Dan Green; Simon Pittard; Alun Lucas; Rob Hawkes; Adrian Carpenter
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Automatic, localized in vivo adjustment of all first- and second-order shim coils.

Authors:  R Gruetter
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Development of a combined microPET-MR system.

Authors:  A J Lucas; R C Hawkes; R E Ansorge; G B Williams; R E Nutt; J C Clark; T D Fryer; T A Carpenter
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2006-08
View more
  8 in total

1.  Reliability of using a fixed matrix in coregistration of combined PET-MRI in a split magnet design.

Authors:  Sj Sawiak; Rc Hawkes; Re Ansorge; Ta Carpenter
Journal:  Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 1.455

2.  PET/MRI assessment of the infarcted mouse heart.

Authors:  Guido Buonincontri; Carmen Methner; Thomas Krieg; Robert C Hawkes; T Adrian Carpenter; Stephen J Sawiak
Journal:  Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 1.455

Review 3.  Advances in PET/MR instrumentation and image reconstruction.

Authors:  Jorge Cabello; Sibylle I Ziegler
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Standardization of Small Animal Imaging-Current Status and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Julia G Mannheim; Firat Kara; Janine Doorduin; Kerstin Fuchs; Gerald Reischl; Sayuan Liang; Marleen Verhoye; Felix Gremse; Laura Mezzanotte; Marc C Huisman
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Data processing of 3D and 4D in-vivo electron paramagnetic resonance imaging co-registered with ultrasound. 3D printing as a registration tool.

Authors:  M Gonet; B Epel; M Elas
Journal:  Comput Electr Eng       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 3.818

6.  PET/MRI in the infarcted mouse heart with the Cambridge split magnet.

Authors:  Guido Buonincontri; Stephen J Sawiak; Carmen Methner; Thomas Krieg; Robert C Hawkes; T Adrian Carpenter
Journal:  Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 1.455

7.  Riociguat reduces infarct size and post-infarct heart failure in mouse hearts: insights from MRI/PET imaging.

Authors:  Carmen Methner; Guido Buonincontri; Chou-Hui Hu; Ana Vujic; Axel Kretschmer; Stephen Sawiak; Adrian Carpenter; Johannes-Peter Stasch; Thomas Krieg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  MRI and PET in mouse models of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Guido Buonincontri; Carmen Methner; T Adrian Carpenter; Robert C Hawkes; Stephen J Sawiak; Thomas Krieg
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 1.355

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.