Literature DB >> 2007792

Correlation of patient and caregiver ratings of cancer pain.

S A Grossman, V R Sheidler, K Swedeen, J Mucenski, S Piantadosi.   

Abstract

Undertreatment of cancer pain is widely recognized. This study sought to determine if inadequate communication about pain intensity between health care providers and their patients could represent a significant factor interfering with the control of cancer pain. One hundred and three consecutive patients with solid tumors and normal mental status examinations were screened within 48 hr during two study periods. The intensity of patient pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) which was given to the patient, his/her primary care nurse, house officer and medical oncology fellow. Sixty-three percent of the patients were taking narcotic analgesics on admission to the hospital. Although there was a correlation between patient and health care provider ratings for the entire group, no statistically significant correlation between the patient's VAS pain score and that of his/her nurse, house officer, or oncology fellow was present in the 44 patients with VAS greater than or equal to 4.0. Agreement between patient and caregiver VAS scores was also examined. When patients rated their pain from 7-10 on the VAS scale, nurses, house officers, and oncology fellows would place their rating of the patient's pain in this range 7%, 20%, and 27% of the time, respectively. Improved correspondence was noted with lower patient VAS scores. This study demonstrates that health care provider impressions of patient pain are often quite different than those of the patient and that these discrepancies are most pronounced in patients with significant pain. The routine use of pain assessment tools, such as the VAS, could enhance patient-caregiver communication and improve care for patients with cancer pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2007792     DOI: 10.1016/0885-3924(91)90518-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  52 in total

1.  Randomized trials with quality of life endpoints: are doctors' ratings of patients' physical symptoms interchangeable with patients' self-ratings?

Authors:  R J Stephens; P Hopwood; D J Girling; D Machin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Delirium and dehydration: inevitable companions of terminal disease?

Authors:  F Stiefel
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Heart rate analysis by sparse representation for acute pain detection.

Authors:  Shai Tejman-Yarden; Ofer Levi; Alex Beizerov; Yisrael Parmet; Tu Nguyen; Michael Saunders; Zvia Rudich; James C Perry; Dewleen G Baker; Tobias Moeller-Bertram
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Perceived pain and satisfaction with medical rehabilitation after hospital discharge.

Authors:  Ivonne-Marie Bergés; Kenneth J Ottenbacher; Pamela M Smith; David Smith; Genn V Ostir
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.477

5.  Comparing tailored computerized symptom assessments to interviews and questionnaires.

Authors:  Cornelia Ruland; Jo Røslien; Suzanne Bakken; Jørn Kristiansen
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

Review 6.  [The benefits of using patient-reported outcomes in cancer treatment: an overview].

Authors:  Lisa M Wintner; Johannes M Giesinger; Georg Kemmler; Monika Sztankay; Anne Oberguggenberger; Eva-Maria Gamper; Barbara Sperner-Unterweger; Bernhard Holzner
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 1.704

7.  Palliative care in primary care: a study to determine whether patients and professionals agree on symptoms.

Authors:  Gail Ewing; Margaret Rogers; Stephen Barclay; Janet McCabe; Anna Martin; Malcolm Campbell; Chris Todd
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 8.  Strategies for the treatment of cancer pain in the new millennium.

Authors:  C Ripamonti; E D Dickerson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 9.  Postcraniotomy headache.

Authors:  Levente Molnár; Éva Simon; Réka Nemes; Béla Fülesdi; Csilla Molnár
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 2.078

10.  Utilizing Multidimensional Computer Adaptive Testing to Mitigate Burden With Patient Reported Outcomes.

Authors:  Michael Bass; Scott Morris; Richard Neapolitan
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2015-11-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.