Literature DB >> 26264057

Heart rate analysis by sparse representation for acute pain detection.

Shai Tejman-Yarden1,2,3, Ofer Levi4, Alex Beizerov5, Yisrael Parmet4, Tu Nguyen6, Michael Saunders7, Zvia Rudich8, James C Perry9, Dewleen G Baker10,11, Tobias Moeller-Bertram11,12.   

Abstract

Objective pain assessment methods pose an advantage over the currently used subjective pain rating tools. Advanced signal processing methodologies, including the wavelet transform (WT) and the orthogonal matching pursuit algorithm (OMP), were developed in the past two decades. The aim of this study was to apply and compare these time-specific methods to heart rate samples of healthy subjects for acute pain detection. Fifteen adult volunteers participated in a study conducted in the pain clinic at a single center. Each subject's heart rate was sampled for 5-min baseline, followed by a cold pressor test (CPT). Analysis was done by the WT and the OMP algorithm with a Fourier/Wavelet dictionary separately. Data from 11 subjects were analyzed. Compared to baseline, The WT analysis showed a significant coefficients' density increase during the pain incline period (p < 0.01) and the entire CPT (p < 0.01), with significantly higher coefficient amplitudes. The OMP analysis showed a significant wavelet coefficients' density increase during pain incline and decline periods (p < 0.01, p < 0.05) and the entire CPT (p < 0.001), with suggestive higher amplitudes. Comparison of both methods showed that during the baseline there was a significant reduction in wavelet coefficient density using the OMP algorithm (p < 0.001). Analysis by the two-way ANOVA with repeated measures showed a significant proportional increase in wavelet coefficients during the incline period and the entire CPT using the OMP algorithm (p < 0.01). Both methods provided accurate and non-delayed detection of pain events. Statistical analysis proved the OMP to be by far more specific allowing the Fourier coefficients to represent the signal's basic harmonics and the wavelet coefficients to focus on the time-specific painful event. This is an initial study using OMP for pain detection; further studies need to prove the efficiency of this system in different settings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Heart rate variability; Orthogonal matching pursuit algorithm; Pain; Wavelet transform

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26264057     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-015-1350-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  25 in total

1.  Experimentally induced anger, cardiovascular reactivity, and pain sensitivity.

Authors:  S A Janssen; P Spinhoven; J F Brosschot
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  Skin conductance and the stress response from heel stick in preterm infants.

Authors:  H Storm
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.747

3.  Changes in heart rate do not correlate with changes in pain intensity in emergency department patients.

Authors:  Philip Bossart; Dave Fosnocht; Eric Swanson
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.484

4.  Cardiovascular autonomic response during preoperative stress and postoperative pain.

Authors:  Philip H Heller; Franklin Perry; Karen Naifeh; Newton C Gordon; Nancy Wachter-Shikura; Jon Levine
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  Correlation of patient and caregiver ratings of cancer pain.

Authors:  S A Grossman; V R Sheidler; K Swedeen; J Mucenski; S Piantadosi
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.612

6.  Wavelet transform analysis of heart rate variability during myocardial ischaemia.

Authors:  L G Gamero; J Vila; F Palacios
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Establishing a link between heart rate and pain in healthy subjects: a gender effect.

Authors:  Yannick Tousignant-Laflamme; Pierre Rainville; Serge Marchand
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.820

8.  Pain measurement: an overview.

Authors:  C R Chapman; K L Casey; R Dubner; K M Foley; R H Gracely; A E Reading
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  Heart rate variability and nonlinear dynamic analysis in patients with stress-induced cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Goran Krstacic; Gianfranco Parati; Dragan Gamberger; Paolo Castiglioni; Antonija Krstacic; Robert Steiner
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  Psychometric characteristics and clinical usefulness of physical performance tests in patients with low back pain.

Authors:  M J Simmonds; S L Olson; S Jones; T Hussein; C E Lee; D Novy; H Radwan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.