Literature DB >> 20076767

Bayesian Calibration of Microsimulation Models.

Carolyn M Rutter1, Diana L Miglioretti, James E Savarino.   

Abstract

Microsimulation models that describe disease processes synthesize information from multiple sources and can be used to estimate the effects of screening and treatment on cancer incidence and mortality at a population level. These models are characterized by simulation of individual event histories for an idealized population of interest. Microsimulation models are complex and invariably include parameters that are not well informed by existing data. Therefore, a key component of model development is the choice of parameter values. Microsimulation model parameter values are selected to reproduce expected or known results though the process of model calibration. Calibration may be done by perturbing model parameters one at a time or by using a search algorithm. As an alternative, we propose a Bayesian method to calibrate microsimulation models that uses Markov chain Monte Carlo. We show that this approach converges to the target distribution and use a simulation study to demonstrate its finite-sample performance. Although computationally intensive, this approach has several advantages over previously proposed methods, including the use of statistical criteria to select parameter values, simultaneous calibration of multiple parameters to multiple data sources, incorporation of information via prior distributions, description of parameter identifiability, and the ability to obtain interval estimates of model parameters. We develop a microsimulation model for colorectal cancer and use our proposed method to calibrate model parameters. The microsimulation model provides a good fit to the calibration data. We find evidence that some parameters are identified primarily through prior distributions. Our results underscore the need to incorporate multiple sources of variability (i.e., due to calibration data, unknown parameters, and estimated parameters and predicted values) when calibrating and applying microsimulation models.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20076767      PMCID: PMC2805837          DOI: 10.1198/jasa.2009.ap07466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc        ISSN: 0162-1459            Impact factor:   5.033


  49 in total

1.  Latent class model diagnosis.

Authors:  E S Garrett; S L Zeger
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  The MISCAN-COLON simulation model for the evaluation of colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  F Loeve; R Boer; G J van Oortmarssen; M van Ballegooijen; J D Habbema
Journal:  Comput Biomed Res       Date:  1999-02

Review 3.  Simulation modeling of outcomes and cost effectiveness.

Authors:  S D Ramsey; M McIntosh; R Etzioni; N Urban
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.722

4.  Evaluation of a selective screening for colorectal carcinoma: the Taiwan Multicenter Cancer Screening (TAMCAS) project.

Authors:  T H Chen; M F Yen; M S Lai; S L Koong; C Y Wang; J M Wong; T C Prevost; S W Duffy
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings.

Authors:  T F Imperiale; D R Wagner; C Y Lin; G N Larkin; J D Rogge; D F Ransohoff
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-07-20       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380.

Authors:  D A Lieberman; D G Weiss; J H Bond; D J Ahnen; H Garewal; G Chejfec
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-07-20       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Trends in screening for colorectal cancer--United States, 1997 and 1999.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2001-03-09       Impact factor: 17.586

8.  Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer (1973 through 1998), featuring cancers with recent increasing trends.

Authors:  H L Howe; P A Wingo; M J Thun; L A Ries; H M Rosenberg; E G Feigal; B K Edwards
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-06-06       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Cost-utility of one-time colonoscopic screening for colorectal cancer at various ages.

Authors:  R M Ness; A M Holmes; R Klein; R Dittus
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Cancer surveillance series: interpreting trends in prostate cancer--part III: Quantifying the link between population prostate-specific antigen testing and recent declines in prostate cancer mortality.

Authors:  R Etzioni; J M Legler; E J Feuer; R M Merrill; K A Cronin; B F Hankey
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1999-06-16       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  22 in total

1.  Incorporating calibrated model parameters into sensitivity analyses: deterministic and probabilistic approaches.

Authors:  Douglas C A Taylor; Vivek Pawar; Denise T Kruzikas; Kristen E Gilmore; Myrlene Sanon; Milton C Weinstein
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  An evidence-based microsimulation model for colorectal cancer: validation and application.

Authors:  Carolyn M Rutter; James E Savarino
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Comparative economic evaluation of data from the ACRIN National CT Colonography Trial with three cancer intervention and surveillance modeling network microsimulations.

Authors:  David J Vanness; Amy B Knudsen; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Carolyn M Rutter; Ilana F Gareen; Benjamin A Herman; Karen M Kuntz; Ann G Zauber; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Eric J Feuer; Mei-Hsiu Chen; C Daniel Johnson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Evaluating Parameter Uncertainty in a Simulation Model of Cancer Using Emulators.

Authors:  Tiago M de Carvalho; Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Luc Coffeng; Harry J de Koning
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Bayesian Methods for Calibrating Health Policy Models: A Tutorial.

Authors:  Nicolas A Menzies; Djøra I Soeteman; Ankur Pandya; Jane J Kim
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Dynamic microsimulation models for health outcomes: a review.

Authors:  Carolyn M Rutter; Alan M Zaslavsky; Eric J Feuer
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  Using Observational Data to Calibrate Simulation Models.

Authors:  Eleanor J Murray; James M Robins; George R Seage; Sara Lodi; Emily P Hyle; Krishna P Reddy; Kenneth A Freedberg; Miguel A Hernán
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 2.583

8.  Validation of Colorectal Cancer Models on Long-term Outcomes from a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Maria DeYoreo; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Amy B Knudsen; Karen M Kuntz; Ann G Zauber; Carolyn M Rutter
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Validation of Models Used to Inform Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines: Accuracy and Implications.

Authors:  Carolyn M Rutter; Amy B Knudsen; Tracey L Marsh; V Paul Doria-Rose; Eric Johnson; Chester Pabiniak; Karen M Kuntz; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Ann G Zauber; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 2.583

10.  An updated natural history model of cervical cancer: derivation of model parameters.

Authors:  Nicole G Campos; Emily A Burger; Stephen Sy; Monisha Sharma; Mark Schiffman; Ana Cecilia Rodriguez; Allan Hildesheim; Rolando Herrero; Jane J Kim
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 4.897

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.