Literature DB >> 10506694

Evaluation of a selective screening for colorectal carcinoma: the Taiwan Multicenter Cancer Screening (TAMCAS) project.

T H Chen1, M F Yen, M S Lai, S L Koong, C Y Wang, J M Wong, T C Prevost, S W Duffy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the efficacy of mass screening for colorectal carcinoma (CRC) with a fecal occult blood test has been demonstrated in several randomized trials, a mass screening approach used in countries with intermediate or low incidence of CRC might be costly. Screening high risk people may be an alternative approach, to aid in the prevention of death from CRC. However, the efficacy of CRC screening for high risk people in such countries is uncertain.
METHODS: For this study, a multicenter design was devised to identify high risk groups without clinical symptoms related to CRC; these subjects were identified through the study of index cases of CRC in Taiwan. Colonoscopy, in combination with a fecal occult blood test or double-contrast barium enema, was used to screen high risk groups. A total of 8909 subjects were invited to attend screening. Of 8909, 81 with asymptomatic CRC were detected in one-shot screening. Markov models, in conjunction with a simulated approach, were proposed to estimate relevant parameters in relation to disease progression and to assess the effect of the interval between screenings on the efficacy of CRC screening for these high risk groups.
RESULTS: The estimated preclinical incidence rate was 0. 00396 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.002944-0.004985), which was 21 times that reported from a cancer registry in 1994. The simultaneous estimations of mean sojourn time (the average duration between the preclinical screen-detectable phase and the clinical phase) and sensitivity were 2.8 years (95% CI, 2.15-4.30) and 95.0% (95% CI, 24.4-99.9%), respectively. Predictions of mortality reduction for people who received annual, biennial, and triennial screening regimes compared with controls were 26% (95% CI, 0-50%), 23% (95% CI, 0-48%), and 21% (95% CI, 0-47%), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of selective colorectal carcinoma screening has been demonstrated in this study. A high preclinical CRC incidence rate also suggests that such a screening strategy might be cost-effective for countries with intermediate or low incidence of CRC. Methods proposed in this study can be used to evaluate the efficacy of CRC screening in similar screening trials. Copyright 1999 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10506694

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  13 in total

1.  An evidence-based microsimulation model for colorectal cancer: validation and application.

Authors:  Carolyn M Rutter; James E Savarino
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Lifetime costs of the top five cancers in Taiwan.

Authors:  Hui-Chu Lang; Shi-Liang Wu
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-03-27

Review 3.  Gastroscopy following a positive fecal occult blood test and negative colonoscopy: systematic review and guideline.

Authors:  Johane Allard; Roxanne Cosby; M Elisabeth Del Giudice; E Jan Irvine; David Morgan; Jill Tinmouth
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.522

4.  Multistate models for the natural history of cancer progression.

Authors:  Li C Cheung; Paul S Albert; Shrutikona Das; Richard J Cook
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 9.075

5.  Relative rates of missed diagnosis for colonoscopy, barium enema, and flexible sigmoidoscopy in 379 patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Catherine T Frenette; Williamson B Strum
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2008-09-13

6.  Bayesian Calibration of Microsimulation Models.

Authors:  Carolyn M Rutter; Diana L Miglioretti; James E Savarino
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 5.033

7.  Evaluating risk factor assumptions: a simulation-based approach.

Authors:  Carolyn M Rutter; Diana L Miglioretti; James E Savarino
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening with stool DNA testing in intermediate-incidence countries.

Authors:  Grace Hui-Min Wu; Yi-Ming Wang; Amy Ming-Fang Yen; Jau-Min Wong; Hsin-Chih Lai; Jane Warwick; Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 9.  Clinical and Biological Features of Interval Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Yu Mi Lee; Kyu Chan Huh
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2017-03-21

10.  Parameter estimates for invasive breast cancer progression in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study.

Authors:  S Taghipour; D Banjevic; A B Miller; N Montgomery; A K S Jardine; B J Harvey
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.