CONTEXT: Cognitive impairment in late-life depression is a core feature of the illness. OBJECTIVE: To test whether donepezil hydrochloride and antidepressant therapy is superior to placebo and antidepressant therapy in improving cognitive performance and instrumental activities of daily living and in reducing recurrences of depression over 2 years of maintenance treatment. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled maintenance trial. SETTING:University clinic. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred thirty older adults aged 65 years and older with recently remitted major depression. INTERVENTIONS: Random assignment to maintenance antidepressant pharmacotherapy and donepezil or to maintenance antidepressant pharmacotherapy and placebo. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Global neuropsychological performance, cognitive instrumental activities of daily living, and recurrent depression. RESULTS:Donepezil and antidepressant therapy temporarily improved global cognition (treatment × time interaction, F₂,₂₁₆ = 3.78; P = .03), but effect sizes were small (Cohen d = 0.27, group difference at 1 year). A marginal benefit to cognitive instrumental activities of daily living was also observed (treatment × time interaction, F₂,₁₃₇ = 2.94; P = .06). The donepezil group was more likely than the placebo group to experience recurrent major depression (35% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 24%-46%] vs 19% [95% CI, 9%-29%], respectively; log-rank χ² = 3.97; P = .05; hazard ratio = 2.09 [95% CI, 1.00-4.41]). Post hoc subgroup analyses showed that of 57 participants with mild cognitive impairment, 3 of 30 participants (10% [95% CI, 0%-21%]) receiving donepezil and 9 of 27 participants (33% [95% CI, 16%-51%]) receiving placebo had a conversion to dementia over 2 years (Fisher exact test, P = .05). The mild cognitive impairment subgroup had recurrence rates of major depression of 44% with donepezil vs 12% with placebo (likelihood ratio = 4.91; P = .03). The subgroup with normal cognition (n = 73) showed no benefit with donepezil and no increase in recurrence of major depression. CONCLUSIONS: Whether a cholinesterase inhibitor should be used as augmentation in the maintenance treatment of late-life depression depends on a careful weighing of risks and benefits in those with mild cognitive impairment. In cognitively intact patients, donepezil appears to have no clear benefit for preventing progression to mild cognitive impairment or dementia or for preventing recurrence of depression. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00177671.
RCT Entities:
CONTEXT: Cognitive impairment in late-life depression is a core feature of the illness. OBJECTIVE: To test whether donepezil hydrochloride and antidepressant therapy is superior to placebo and antidepressant therapy in improving cognitive performance and instrumental activities of daily living and in reducing recurrences of depression over 2 years of maintenance treatment. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled maintenance trial. SETTING: University clinic. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred thirty older adults aged 65 years and older with recently remitted major depression. INTERVENTIONS: Random assignment to maintenance antidepressant pharmacotherapy and donepezil or to maintenance antidepressant pharmacotherapy and placebo. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Global neuropsychological performance, cognitive instrumental activities of daily living, and recurrent depression. RESULTS:Donepezil and antidepressant therapy temporarily improved global cognition (treatment × time interaction, F₂,₂₁₆ = 3.78; P = .03), but effect sizes were small (Cohen d = 0.27, group difference at 1 year). A marginal benefit to cognitive instrumental activities of daily living was also observed (treatment × time interaction, F₂,₁₃₇ = 2.94; P = .06). The donepezil group was more likely than the placebo group to experience recurrent major depression (35% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 24%-46%] vs 19% [95% CI, 9%-29%], respectively; log-rank χ² = 3.97; P = .05; hazard ratio = 2.09 [95% CI, 1.00-4.41]). Post hoc subgroup analyses showed that of 57 participants with mild cognitive impairment, 3 of 30 participants (10% [95% CI, 0%-21%]) receiving donepezil and 9 of 27 participants (33% [95% CI, 16%-51%]) receiving placebo had a conversion to dementia over 2 years (Fisher exact test, P = .05). The mild cognitive impairment subgroup had recurrence rates of major depression of 44% with donepezil vs 12% with placebo (likelihood ratio = 4.91; P = .03). The subgroup with normal cognition (n = 73) showed no benefit with donepezil and no increase in recurrence of major depression. CONCLUSIONS: Whether a cholinesterase inhibitor should be used as augmentation in the maintenance treatment of late-life depression depends on a careful weighing of risks and benefits in those with mild cognitive impairment. In cognitively intact patients, donepezil appears to have no clear benefit for preventing progression to mild cognitive impairment or dementia or for preventing recurrence of depression. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00177671.
Authors: Joan C Rogers; Margo B Holm; Ketki D Raina; Mary Amanda Dew; Min-Mei Shih; Amy Begley; Patricia R Houck; Sati Mazumdar; Charles F Reynolds Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2010-08-15 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: C F Reynolds; E Frank; J M Perel; S D Imber; C Cornes; M D Miller; S Mazumdar; P R Houck; M A Dew; J A Stack; B G Pollock; D J Kupfer Journal: JAMA Date: 1999-01-06 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: M D Miller; C F Paradis; P R Houck; S Mazumdar; J A Stack; A H Rifai; B Mulsant; C F Reynolds Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 1992-03 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Ronald C Petersen; Ronald G Thomas; Michael Grundman; David Bennett; Rachelle Doody; Steven Ferris; Douglas Galasko; Shelia Jin; Jeffrey Kaye; Allan Levey; Eric Pfeiffer; Mary Sano; Christopher H van Dyck; Leon J Thal Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-04-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Joseph S Goveas; Patricia E Hogan; Jane M Kotchen; Jordan W Smoller; Natalie L Denburg; JoAnn E Manson; Aruna Tummala; W Jerry Mysiw; Judith K Ockene; Nancy F Woods; Mark A Espeland; Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller Journal: Int Psychogeriatr Date: 2012-02-03 Impact factor: 3.878
Authors: Wenjun Li; L Tugan Muftuler; Gang Chen; B Douglas Ward; Matthew D Budde; Jennifer L Jones; Malgorzata B Franczak; Piero G Antuono; Shi-Jiang Li; Joseph S Goveas Journal: J Neurol Sci Date: 2013-12-16 Impact factor: 3.181
Authors: Patrick J Brown; Joel R Sneed; Bret R Rutherford; D P Devanand; Steven P Roose Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2013-10-03 Impact factor: 3.485
Authors: Jane S Saczynski; Allison B Rosen; Ryan J McCammon; Kara Zivin; Susan E Andrade; Kenneth M Langa; Sandeep Vijan; Paul A Pirraglia; Becky A Briesacher Journal: Am J Med Date: 2015-01-30 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Davangere P Devanand; Gregory H Pelton; Kristina D'Antonio; Adam Ciarleglio; Jennifer Scodes; Howard Andrews; Julia Lunsford; John L Beyer; Jeffrey R Petrella; Joel Sneed; Michaela Ciovacco; Pudugramam Murali Doraiswamy Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2018-06-28 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Noll L Campbell; Fred Unverzagt; Michael A LaMantia; Babar A Khan; Malaz A Boustani Journal: Clin Geriatr Med Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 3.076
Authors: A G Gildengers; D Chisholm; M A Butters; S J Anderson; A Begley; M Holm; J C Rogers; C F Reynolds; B H Mulsant Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2012-07-30 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Stephen F Smagula; Meryl A Butters; Stewart J Anderson; Eric J Lenze; Mary Amanda Dew; Benoit H Mulsant; Francis E Lotrich; Howard Aizenstein; Charles F Reynolds Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 21.596