Literature DB >> 10899194

Responses of inferior colliculus neurons to amplitude-modulated intracochlear electrical pulses in deaf cats.

R L Snyder1, M Vollmer, C M Moore, S J Rebscher, P A Leake, R E Beitel.   

Abstract

Current cochlear prostheses use amplitude-modulated pulse trains to encode acoustic signals. In this study we examined the responses of inferior colliculus (IC) neurons to sinusoidal amplitude-modulated pulses and compared the maximum unmodulated pulse rate (Fmax) to which they responded with the maximum modulation frequency (maxFm) that they followed. Consistent with previous results, responses to unmodulated pulses were all low-pass functions of pulse rate. Mean Fmax to unmodulated pulses was 104 pulses per second (pps) and modal Fmax was 60 pps. Above Fmax IC neurons ceased responding except for an onset burst at the beginning of the stimulus. However, IC neurons responded to much higher pulse rates when these pulses were amplitude modulated; 74% were relatively insensitive to carrier rate and responded to all modulated carriers including those exceeding 600 pps. In contrast, the responses of these neurons (70%) were low-pass functions of modulation frequency, and the remaining (30%) had band-pass functions with a maxFm of 42 and 34 Hz, respectively. Thus temporal resolution of IC neurons for modulated frequencies is significantly lower than that for unmodulated pulses. These two measures of temporal resolution (Fmax and maxFm) were uncorrelated (r(2) = 0.101). Several parameters influenced the amplitude and temporal structure of modulation responses including modulation depth, overall intensity and modulation-to-carrier rate ratio. We observed distortions in unit responses to amplitude-modulated signals when this ratio was 1/4 to 1/6. Since most current cochlear implant speech processors permit ratios that are significantly greater than this, severe distortion and signal degradation may occur frequently in these devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10899194     DOI: 10.1152/jn.2000.84.1.166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  23 in total

1.  Encoding and decoding amplitude-modulated cochlear implant stimuli--a point process analysis.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; Eric Shea-Brown; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Deafness-related decreases in glycine-immunoreactive labeling in the rat cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  Mikiya Asako; Avril G Holt; Ronald D Griffith; Eric D Buras; Richard A Altschuler
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 4.164

3.  Sensitivity of inferior colliculus neurons to interaural time differences in the envelope versus the fine structure with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Models of brainstem responses to bilateral electrical stimulation.

Authors:  H Steven Colburn; Yoojin Chung; Yi Zhou; Andrew Brughera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-10-22

5.  Neural ITD coding with bilateral cochlear implants: effect of binaurally coherent jitter.

Authors:  Kenneth E Hancock; Yoojin Chung; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Topography of auditory nerve projections to the cochlear nucleus in cats after neonatal deafness and electrical stimulation by a cochlear implant.

Authors:  Patricia A Leake; Gary T Hradek; Ben H Bonham; Russell L Snyder
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-06-24

7.  Cochlear-implant high pulse rate and narrow electrode configuration impair transmission of temporal information to the auditory cortex.

Authors:  John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Auditory cortex phase locking to amplitude-modulated cochlear implant pulse trains.

Authors:  John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  Auditory midbrain implant: a review.

Authors:  Hubert H Lim; Minoo Lenarz; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-09

10.  Bilateral cochlear implantation in the ferret: a novel animal model for behavioral studies.

Authors:  Douglas E H Hartley; Tara Vongpaisal; Jin Xu; Robert K Shepherd; Andrew J King; Amal Isaiah
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2010-05-31       Impact factor: 2.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.