Literature DB >> 20070296

Time-dependent predictive accuracy in the presence of competing risks.

P Saha1, P J Heagerty.   

Abstract

Competing risks arise naturally in time-to-event studies. In this article, we propose time-dependent accuracy measures for a marker when we have censored survival times and competing risks. Time-dependent versions of sensitivity or true positive (TP) fraction naturally correspond to consideration of either cumulative (or prevalent) cases that accrue over a fixed time period, or alternatively to incident cases that are observed among event-free subjects at any select time. Time-dependent (dynamic) specificity (1-false positive (FP)) can be based on the marker distribution among event-free subjects. We extend these definitions to incorporate cause of failure for competing risks outcomes. The proposed estimation for cause-specific cumulative TP/dynamic FP is based on the nearest neighbor estimation of bivariate distribution function of the marker and the event time. On the other hand, incident TP/dynamic FP can be estimated using a possibly nonproportional hazards Cox model for the cause-specific hazards and riskset reweighting of the marker distribution. The proposed methods extend the time-dependent predictive accuracy measures of Heagerty, Lumley, and Pepe (2000, Biometrics 56, 337-344) and Heagerty and Zheng (2005, Biometrics 61, 92-105).
© 2010, The International Biometric Society
No claim to original US government works.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20070296      PMCID: PMC4512205          DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01375.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  12 in total

1.  Predictive accuracy and explained variation in Cox regression.

Authors:  M Schemper; R Henderson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: new representations of old estimators.

Authors:  T A Gooley; W Leisenring; J Crowley; B E Storer
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1999-03-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 3.  Prognostic models including the Child-Pugh, MELD and Mayo risk scores--where are we and where should we go?

Authors:  Erik Christensen
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 25.083

4.  Survival model predictive accuracy and ROC curves.

Authors:  Patrick J Heagerty; Yingye Zheng
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Consistent estimation of the expected Brier score in general survival models with right-censored event times.

Authors:  Thomas A Gerds; Martin Schumacher
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.207

6.  Incidence of cardiovascular disease in older Americans: the cardiovascular health study.

Authors:  Alice M Arnold; Bruce M Psaty; Lewis H Kuller; Gregory L Burke; Teri A Manolio; Linda P Fried; John A Robbins; Richard A Kronmal
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  The Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study: rationale, organization, and selected characteristics of the participants.

Authors:  R A Kaslow; D G Ostrow; R Detels; J P Phair; B F Polk; C R Rinaldo
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Prospective accuracy for longitudinal markers.

Authors:  Yingye Zheng; Patrick J Heagerty
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  A multiparametric panel for ovarian cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and response to chemotherapy.

Authors:  Yingye Zheng; Dionyssios Katsaros; Shannon J C Shan; Irene Rigault de la Longrais; Mauro Porpiglia; Andreas Scorilas; Nam W Kim; Robert L Wolfert; Iris Simon; Lin Li; Ziding Feng; Eleftherios P Diamandis
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-12-01       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Validation and clinical utility of a 70-gene prognostic signature for women with node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Marc Buyse; Sherene Loi; Laura van't Veer; Giuseppe Viale; Mauro Delorenzi; Annuska M Glas; Mahasti Saghatchian d'Assignies; Jonas Bergh; Rosette Lidereau; Paul Ellis; Adrian Harris; Jan Bogaerts; Patrick Therasse; Arno Floore; Mohamed Amakrane; Fanny Piette; Emiel Rutgers; Christos Sotiriou; Fatima Cardoso; Martine J Piccart
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  30 in total

1.  Sample size estimation for time-dependent receiver operating characteristic.

Authors:  H Li; C Gatsonis
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Intestinal Blautia Is Associated with Reduced Death from Graft-versus-Host Disease.

Authors:  Robert R Jenq; Ying Taur; Sean M Devlin; Doris M Ponce; Jenna D Goldberg; Katya F Ahr; Eric R Littmann; Lilan Ling; Asia C Gobourne; Liza C Miller; Melissa D Docampo; Jonathan U Peled; Nicholas Arpaia; Justin R Cross; Tatanisha K Peets; Melissa A Lumish; Yusuke Shono; Jarrod A Dudakov; Hendrik Poeck; Alan M Hanash; Juliet N Barker; Miguel-Angel Perales; Sergio A Giralt; Eric G Pamer; Marcel R M van den Brink
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Modified Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney Test and Power against Strong Null.

Authors:  Youyi Fong; Ying Huang
Journal:  Am Stat       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 8.710

4.  A direct method to evaluate the time-dependent predictive accuracy for biomarkers.

Authors:  Weining Shen; Jing Ning; Ying Yuan
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  A Tutorial on Evaluating the Time-Varying Discrimination Accuracy of Survival Models Used in Dynamic Decision Making.

Authors:  Aasthaa Bansal; Patrick J Heagerty
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2018-10-14       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  EVALUATING RISK-PREDICTION MODELS USING DATA FROM ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS.

Authors:  L E Wang; Pamela A Shaw; Hansie M Mathelier; Stephen E Kimmel; Benjamin French
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.083

7.  Evaluating prognostic accuracy of biomarkers under competing risk.

Authors:  Yingye Zheng; Tianxi Cai; Yuying Jin; Ziding Feng
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  High day 28 ST2 levels predict for acute graft-versus-host disease and transplant-related mortality after cord blood transplantation.

Authors:  Doris M Ponce; Patrick Hilden; Christen Mumaw; Sean M Devlin; Marissa Lubin; Sergio Giralt; Jenna D Goldberg; Alan Hanash; Katharine Hsu; Robert Jenq; Miguel-Angel Perales; Craig Sauter; Marcel R M van den Brink; James W Young; Renier Brentjens; Nancy A Kernan; Susan E Prockop; Richard J O'Reilly; Andromachi Scaradavou; Sophie Paczesny; Juliet N Barker
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  A 13-gene signature prognostic of HPV-negative OSCC: discovery and external validation.

Authors:  Pawadee Lohavanichbutr; Eduardo Méndez; F Christopher Holsinger; Tessa C Rue; Yuzheng Zhang; John Houck; Melissa P Upton; Neal Futran; Stephen M Schwartz; Pei Wang; Chu Chen
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Two-stage sampling designs for external validation of personal risk models.

Authors:  Alice S Whittemore; Jerry Halpern
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 3.021

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.