Literature DB >> 18056174

A multiparametric panel for ovarian cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and response to chemotherapy.

Yingye Zheng1, Dionyssios Katsaros, Shannon J C Shan, Irene Rigault de la Longrais, Mauro Porpiglia, Andreas Scorilas, Nam W Kim, Robert L Wolfert, Iris Simon, Lin Li, Ziding Feng, Eleftherios P Diamandis.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Our goal was to examine a panel of 11 biochemical variables, measured in cytosolic extracts of ovarian tissues (normal, benign, and malignant) by quantitative ELISAs for their ability to diagnose, prognose, and predict response to chemotherapy of ovarian cancer patients. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Eleven proteins were measured (9 kallikreins, B7-H4, and CA125) in cytosolic extracts of 259 ovarian tumor tissues, 50 tissues from benign conditions, 35 normal tissues, and 44 tissues from nonovarian tumors that metastasized to the ovary. Odds ratios and hazard ratios and their 95% confidence interval were calculated. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves for censored survival data were used to evaluate the performance of the biomarkers. Resampling was used to validate the performance.
RESULTS: Most biomarkers effectively separated cancer from noncancer groups. A composite marker provided an area under the curve of 0.97 (95% confidence interval, 0.95-0.99) for discriminating normal and cancer groups. Univariately, hK5 and hK6 were positively associated with progression. After adjusting for clinical variables in multivariate analysis, both hK10 and hK11 significantly predicted time to progression. Increasing levels of hK13 were associated with chemotherapy response, and the predictive power of hK13 to chemotherapy response was improved by a panel of five biomarkers.
CONCLUSIONS: The evidence shows that a group of kallikreins and multiparametric combinations with other biomarkers and clinical variables can significantly assist with ovarian cancer classification, prognosis, and response to platinum-based chemotherapy. In particular, we developed a multiparametric strategy for predicting ovarian cancer response to chemotherapy, comprising several biomarkers and clinical features.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18056174     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  24 in total

1.  Clinical significance of the B7-H4 coregulatory molecule as a novel prognostic marker in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Takaaki Arigami; Yoshikazu Uenosono; Sumiya Ishigami; Takahiko Hagihara; Naoto Haraguchi; Shoji Natsugoe
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  p53 autoantibodies as potential detection and prognostic biomarkers in serous ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Karen S Anderson; Jessica Wong; Allison Vitonis; Christopher P Crum; Patrick M Sluss; Joshua Labaer; Daniel Cramer
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer: inverse association of KLK13 and KLK14 mRNA levels in tumor tissue and patients' prognosis.

Authors:  Larissa Dettmar; Nancy Ahmed; Matthias Kotzsch; Sandra Diersch; Rudolf Napieralski; Dalila Darmoul; Manfred Schmitt; Wilko Weichert; Marion Kiechle; Julia Dorn; Viktor Magdolen
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule: a novel biomarker for breast cancer.

Authors:  Vathany Kulasingam; Yingye Zheng; Antoninus Soosaipillai; Antonette E Leon; Massimo Gion; Eleftherios P Diamandis
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Matrix-insensitive protein assays push the limits of biosensors in medicine.

Authors:  Richard S Gaster; Drew A Hall; Carsten H Nielsen; Sebastian J Osterfeld; Heng Yu; Kathleen E Mach; Robert J Wilson; Boris Murmann; Joseph C Liao; Sanjiv S Gambhir; Shan X Wang
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2009-10-11       Impact factor: 53.440

6.  Beyond CA125: the coming of age of ovarian cancer biomarkers. Are we there yet?

Authors:  Dimitra Sasaroli; George Coukos; Nathalie Scholler
Journal:  Biomark Med       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 2.851

7.  Time-dependent predictive accuracy in the presence of competing risks.

Authors:  P Saha; P J Heagerty
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Integrated multiomic predictors for ovarian cancer survival.

Authors:  Alan Fu; Helena R Chang; Zuo-Feng Zhang
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 4.944

9.  The use of kallikrein-related peptidases as adjuvant prognostic markers in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  M Talieri; L Li; Y Zheng; D K Alexopoulou; A Soosaipillai; A Scorilas; D Xynopoulos; E P Diamandis
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  KLK6 and KLK13 predict tumor recurrence in epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  N M A White; M Mathews; G M Yousef; A Prizada; C Popadiuk; J J E Doré
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.