Literature DB >> 24123273

Sample size estimation for time-dependent receiver operating characteristic.

H Li1, C Gatsonis.   

Abstract

In contrast to the usual ROC analysis with a contemporaneous reference standard, the time-dependent setting introduces the possibility that the reference standard refers to an event at a future time and may not be known for every patient due to censoring. The goal of this research is to determine the sample size required for a study design to address the question of the accuracy of a diagnostic test using the area under the curve in time-dependent ROC analysis. We adapt a previously published estimator of the time-dependent area under the ROC curve, which is a function of the expected conditional survival functions. This estimator accommodates censored data. The estimation of the required sample size is based on approximations of the expected conditional survival functions and their variances, derived under parametric assumptions of an exponential failure time and an exponential censoring time. We also consider different patient enrollment strategies. The proposed method can provide an adequate sample size to ensure that the test's accuracy is estimated to a prespecified precision. We present results of a simulation study to assess the accuracy of the method and its robustness to departures from the parametric assumptions. We apply the proposed method to design of a study of positron emission tomography as predictor of disease free survival in women undergoing therapy for cervical cancer.
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  censoring; parametric survival model; sample size estimation; time-dependent AUC; time-dependent ROC; uniform accrual period

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24123273      PMCID: PMC4170805          DOI: 10.1002/sim.6005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  12 in total

1.  Time-dependent ROC curves for censored survival data and a diagnostic marker.

Authors:  P J Heagerty; T Lumley; M S Pepe
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Limitations of the odds ratio in gauging the performance of a diagnostic, prognostic, or screening marker.

Authors:  Margaret Sullivan Pepe; Holly Janes; Gary Longton; Wendy Leisenring; Polly Newcomb
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-05-01       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Semiparametric estimation of time-dependent ROC curves for longitudinal marker data.

Authors:  Yingye Zheng; Patrick J Heagerty
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  Survival model predictive accuracy and ROC curves.

Authors:  Patrick J Heagerty; Yingye Zheng
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Estimation of time-dependent area under the ROC curve for long-term risk prediction.

Authors:  Lloyd E Chambless; Guoqing Diao
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-10-30       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Receiver operating characteristic analysis for the evaluation of diagnosis and prediction.

Authors:  Constantine A Gatsonis
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  On the C-statistics for evaluating overall adequacy of risk prediction procedures with censored survival data.

Authors:  Hajime Uno; Tianxi Cai; Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino; L J Wei
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Assessing the performance of prediction models: a framework for traditional and novel measures.

Authors:  Ewout W Steyerberg; Andrew J Vickers; Nancy R Cook; Thomas Gerds; Mithat Gonen; Nancy Obuchowski; Michael J Pencina; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.822

9.  Assessing tumor hypoxia in cervical cancer by PET with 60Cu-labeled diacetyl-bis(N4-methylthiosemicarbazone).

Authors:  Farrokh Dehdashti; Perry W Grigsby; Jason S Lewis; Richard Laforest; Barry A Siegel; Michael J Welch
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Prospective accuracy for longitudinal markers.

Authors:  Yingye Zheng; Patrick J Heagerty
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.